Inside California’s New Mandatory Ethnic Studies Course
It teaches students “How to Tell Someone They Sound Racist” and claims race is a “Eurocentric biological fallacy.” Soon, it will be a high school graduation requirement in the state. Full analysis from Evan Milenko 👇
────────────────────
California is finally ending racism. Or something.
For nearly a decade, the state has been molding an Ethnic Studies course that will soon be a graduation requirement. Already, many high school districts across California have been mandating the course for freshmen. Government bureaucrats desperately want your kids to take this course. Parents don’t.
It’s not hard to see why. Ethnic Studies is just one of California’s schemes to use taxpayer dollars to canonize radical leftist identity politics into K-12 education. If that wasn’t inherently obvious, State Senator Jose Medina was kind enough to spell it out. When the initial attempt to require Ethnic Studies in high schools was vetoed in 2020, Medina — the author of the bill — responded by saying it was “a failure to push back against the racial rhetoric and bullying of Donald Trump.”
A simple glance at the state’s model curriculum also reveals the activist nature of the course. The 696-page document reads as if it were a not-so-subtle parody of tired liberal cliches. Just one snippet of the insanity includes “intentional respellings, to challenge various forms of oppression and marginalization.” Old classics like Herstory and Latinx appear, joined by their new comrades: Hxrstory and Latin@. Perhaps more offensively, there is not even an explanation of how these words could possibly be pronounced. But in order to murder language even further, Xicanx is proposed as an alternative Chicano. Maybe the two x’s symbolize the chromosomes that you’re no longer allowed to acknowledge as having any meaning?
Ostensibly, Ethnic Studies will help “students to engage critically in the gray areas of controversial topics.” In order to facilitate difficult conversations in the classroom, the curriculum links a resource which instructs teachers to “Establish a Safe Space” in the classroom and have students watch a video titled “How to Tell Someone They Sound Racist.” The course outline also mentions that many teachers begin lessons by acknowledging that they are on native land. Such framing undermines any chance of students engaging in real debate over these topics.
In sample lessons, students are expected to analyze and debate the Black Panther Party and their Ten-Point Plan. Omitted from the provided information is any mention of prominent members like Eldridge Cleaver, who famously wrote that he considered his rape of white women an “insurrectionary act.” Also neglected are references to the BPP’s internal violence, such as the torture and murder of Alex Rackley.
More revealing of the general thrust of the course, race is defined as a “Eurocentric Biological Fallacy” which in the US supposedly breaks down as “people of color (POC) and white people.” Throughout the document, “Black” is capitalized while “white” is not. The curriculum assumes that anything Western is oppressive, while anything non-Western is framed as liberating. As Christopher Rufo reported, a call-and-response “community chant” was included so students could honor the Aztec deities of war. Overall, the course can be summarized in just three words: White men bad.
These are not cherry-picked examples but are indicative of the true purpose of the course. The curriculum’s own “Guiding Principles” state that it is designed to “Critique empire building in its past and its relationship to white supremacy, racism, and other forms of power and oppression,” and to “build new possibilities for a post-racist, post-systematic-racism society that promotes collective narratives of transformative resistance, critical hope, and radical healing.”
All of this is bad enough, but the finalized curriculum is actually the product of multiple rewrites that toned down the initial draft’s most radical elements. The 2019 curriculum ran into backlash because it wore its radical roots too openly. It explicitly put capitalism alongside white supremacy when listing oppressive systems of power. To remedy this, the updated version replaced the word “capitalism” with “exploitative economic systems.” Problem solved!
Much of the uproar over the first draft came from the Jewish community. The course notably featured extremely one-dimensional coverage of the Israel/Palestine conflict. The proposed glossary, which defines microaggressions, Islamophobia, and glowingly praises the BDS movement somehow “forgot” to include anti-Semitism as a term.
The natural enemy of any educator is the concerned parent. These relatively minor edits led to all the writers and members of the original Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum penning a letter asking to have their names removed. So, in the five years it took to simply finish a curriculum, it managed to alienate large swaths of the public and turn away its own writers. California then took this mark of success to the next logical step: making Ethnic Studies a graduation requirement.
Technically, the course does not have to be offered yet, as the estimated $276 million a year it would require has not been allocated in the state budget. But school districts are rolling with the proposed plan anyway.
Since local districts can use the model curriculum as simply guidelines, they could have toned down the most ridiculous elements and turned Ethnic Studies into a somewhat benign, if eye-roll inducing, course about diversity. But where the state model told them to jump, teachers and administrators asked if they could do it off a cliff.
A prime example is San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD), an early adopter of Ethnic Studies long before the state mandate. The state’s recent efforts gave activist teachers a green light to make the course even more transparently political. In 2024, course materials appeared on the SFUSD website that included lessons on “queering Black History Month” and handouts framing prison abolition as a movement for justice. The San Francisco Standard even reported how one proposed in-class activity had “students role-playing as Israeli soldiers herding Palestinians into refugee camps.”
Scenes like these are not isolated to one district. All over the state, parents are flocking to community board meetings, concerned that their children are being taught divisive material.
At a forum hosted by the Orange County Board of Education, one parent stated, “I believe ethnic studies and critical race theory promotes racism and hate. It focuses on our country’s defeats rather than our victories.” In San Francisco, parents echoed similar concerns. One SFUSD parent, Amanda Fried, summed up the frustration by asking if the curriculum was “teaching [students] what to think or how to think?” and whether it was about “ideology over education.”
The appeal to sanity from parents is met with little real introspection from administrators. According to Mission Local, Thurgood Marshall High School principal Sarah Ballard-Hanson insisted the backlash to Ethnic Studies was part of a “national wave against DEI and truth-telling in schools” and that “SFUSD must resist.” A school board member defended the course by comparing the necessity of Ethnic Studies to math. Despite the pushback from admins, parents’ concerns eventually won out. An outsourced curriculum will be used for the current school year while the district develops its own course materials moving forward.
Parents are right to continue fighting obvious instances of indoctrination in schools. But this problem will continue to rear its head over and over. The course’s fundamental ideology, viewing everything through the lens of oppression, will continue to shape class materials regardless of any future rework.
This ideology is not limited to a curriculum or this course. It’s happening alongside other controversial battles, such as the push for “grading for equity,” a proposed policy the SF Standard reports has faced backlash. Proposed “equitable” changes include revising the grade required to achieve an A as 80 percent, as well as removing grade penalties for late work or participation. As Pirate Wires has also covered, Stanford professor Jo Boaler, who is largely responsible for the new California Math Framework, recommends against teaching middle-schoolers algebra, also in the name of equity.
Battles over bias in education have gone on for years before Ethnic Studies and will continue until there is a serious reckoning with how educators view their role in the classroom. It should no longer be acceptable for teachers to mold kids into activists for their preferred causes.
It seems inevitable that modern political issues will come up in the classroom. The solution is not for teachers to avoid them, but to address them fairly. Teachers need to present dueling perspectives and teach kids to use their own heads so they can make sense of modern, complex issues. The most egregious aspect of curriculums like SFUSD’s is how it pretends to encourage discussion, when there is clearly no room for real dialogue. When every question is asked using the most absurd politically correct language, students know what their teacher wants to hear. Yes, a few kids will leave Ethnic Studies as true-believing social justice warriors, but the majority will view it as a complete waste of time. If California is looking for more kids to mentally check out of school entirely, they’ve found a great way to do it.
The Ethnic Studies debacle is only the latest example of what’s gone wrong in America’s education system. The state attempts to obfuscate the obvious by justifying its curriculum in the introduction, “Why Teach Ethnic Studies In A K-12 Environment?” It claims it will build greater understanding between groups. It goes so far as to say “division is antithetical to ethnic studies.” For a course about ending discord, it sure is causing a lot of it.
—Evan Milenko