Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
This is the biggest problem the media faces: The industry can't work to fix its overt bias because far too many in the industry truly believe themselves to be unbiased and nonpartisan.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
The lib writers lack of any self-awareness, merely shows how deeply ingrained are their biases.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
THIS. 💯PERCENT THIS.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
1
1
I can believe they genuinely think they're unbiased. As @xwanyex has pointed out, they don't believe there's a *legitimate* opposing view. There's no "other side" to present - how can I be biased?
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
1
1
The media can’t conceive that they are somehow slanted or bias.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
These are all people who, ten minutes ago, were telling everybody to check their privilege and divest themselves of whiteness. And yet, they’ve never questioned themselves to see if they might have biases.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
If they truly believe they are unbiased, they need a mental health time out, a very long one.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
When I was at Fox Chicago, Fox national was just starting up, and the attitude was that there was no need for another network, it’d jut be superfluous. Then it was snidely thought of as just dumb blondes. Then someone finally recognized what Bret Baier was doing. Now it’s
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
3
1
21
@60Minutes was must watch TV for decades for me until 2016 when they became pure democrat propaganda. Now it is must avoid TV. It is sad because I loved and trusted it but all of the networks went rfrom left wing bias to democrat propaganda.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
60 minutes is partisan and dishonest
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
1
Bari has her work cut out for her. They truly don’t see their bias. They are not nonpartisan. They’re very anti Israel, anti most things Republican. Hope she can turn CBS News around but that would mean firing a lot of people not shuffling the lineup like CNN did
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
The disconnect of our cultural elites from the mainstream of America is truly something to behold. The truth is, they do not listen.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
3
Maybe they didn't respond in detail because they knew their responses would be leaked?
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
2
@CBSNews it’s a mental illness to be this delusional… you’re fucking left-wing propaganda…
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
1
"Stunned"! As @semaforben noted recently to @MattBelloni on The Town, the primary reason 60 Minutes comes up these days is controversy over screw ups. But thanks to football, it still rates...
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
2
8
58
Same applies to @seattletimes based on the conversations I and others have had with people there through the years. And a mix of fear. They're really afraid of the rabid progressives that scream the loudest in Seattle.
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
1
14
Brilliant
if indeed the staffers at "60 Minutes" genuinely believe the show is non-partisan and unbiased, then they should be retained as employees solely under the terms of the Americans With Disabilities Act.