Replying to @justinmadders
See this👇 £20Billion per YEAR to be made out of Outsourced contracts in NHS. No wonder nhs is struggling.
Read back from top of this thread- show everyone you don't have a clue (or are being deliberately disingenuous) without actually saying it
This is wild. I don’t think you have a full grasp of this - either the facts, or a basic understanding of healthcare. Either way, I don’t have time to educate you today. So I’m muting now.
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
There’s nothing inflationary in matching services to need. As long as the resources are there to do it and you haven’t created legislation to permit corporates to extract profit from public services, which certainly does inflate the cost of healthcare. (PFI being 1 of many such)
1
1
1
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Available resources, not tax, limit public expenditure & how governments decide to divide those resources between the public & private sectors. Government doesn’t print money in the sense you mean, but absolutely does issue the currency. It’s a question of politics not finance.
1
1
1
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Would it surprise you to know that taxes don’t ‘pay’ for services in quite that way? Government issues new money each & every time it spends and taxes it back. The order of the process alters how you look at government expenditure - and its relation to the private sector.
1
1
1
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Obviously McKinsey works for other organisations. Its record is actually very poor for a company with such a wide reach. It was explicit in its communication with the DoH under the Coalition that it consulted with its private clients about the desired direction for the 2012 Act.
1
1
2
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
McKinsey is hardly the only big private sector influencer over the way the NHS is run. It matters because policy and legislation determines where, how and if profit can be made from our public services. It’s way beyond ‘outsourcing’. piped.video/mZacwpsuOm0?si=7BY0…
1
1
1
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Where to start? McKinsey has had a hand in NHS policy since 1973. In 2009 they advised on cuts to meet the £20bn target. Their modelling was behind QIPP: public sector pay freezes; reducing prices paid for delivering care); shifting care out of hospitals, centralising services).
What a disgrace He says I 'need help' inferring mental health problems then mutes Maybe he's one of the few benefitting from the privatisation of health because patients certainly aren't, conveniently has his blinkers on
Are you saying conspiracy theorism is a mental health problem? I’m muting you now. Good luck finding your way back to reality.
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
⚠️WARNING⚠️ Britain's Biggest Heist Since the Enclosures: Oracle, BlackRock, and Labour Are Stealing Your Future Imagine this: Tech billionaire Larry Ellison pumps £300M into Tony Blair's think tank to ghostwrite UK AI policy, then Oracle scoops £54M in secret Home Office extensions and billions in digital ID contracts. It's not a conspiracy. It's proven corruption, exposed by Guardian docs: backroom access, fake "independent" endorsements, and a revolving door spinning faster than a Ponzi scheme. But that's just the appetiser. BlackRock, your pension's shadowy overlord, snags 80% of UK's key ports in a £22.8B fire sale, controlling 60% of container traffic while loading £14B Thames Water debt onto your bills. Freeports? Promised 80,000 jobs, delivered 5,600, at a blistering £896K per head. Teesside's "deregulated paradise"? Run by a cocaine-trafficking "security firm" evading £1.5M in taxes. Labour's betrayal seals it: Starmer's "progressive" zones are Tory tax havens rebranded, overriding local votes, tokenizing your parks on BlackRock's blockchain, and betting £14B on an AI bubble set to pop next quarter. Water guzzled like a city's thirst, air poisoned with 2,000 tons of smog yearly, communities crushed, all subsidised by your energy levy hikes. This is a corporate coup enclosing the commons: water, ports, data, nature itself. FOIs blocked, minutes redacted, 25-year locks unbreakable. I've joined the dots. Demand accountability before reversal is impossible. Dive into the full investigation, sources, scandals, and a blueprint for resistance. Read Now: The Corporate Coup Over the Commons. Please share and subscribe to my Substack. I am a volunteer exposing the massive Ponzi Scheme that is the duopoly's nationwide stealth rollout of deregulated free zones. Ask your neighbours and friends if they've heard of free zones, they will look at you like you have two heads. Keep in mind, this is exactly what our corporate captured government want. I call it Zone Fever #CorporateCapture #UKPolitics #Enclosure2Point0 open.substack.com/pub/europe…
In General Practice we get these emails from local trust “we are on OPEL 4. Only send patients in to Hospital it they really need admission” As if rest of the time we send patients into hospital for emergency admission for a fun day out 🙄 (WE DON’T)
1
1
2
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
The elephant in the room here is that to do the role of a doctor (be one) that same nurse would be required to go to medical school and do Foundation training, regardless of how their undergrad or how much experience they have.
1
1
19
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
So ACPs are not autonomous and are a dependent role? That is not what is being pushed. If every pt an ACP sees has to beseen after by a Dr, there is no point employing them. ACP training is about 500hrs clinical teaching. Med students do 4000hrs just to graduate
5
18
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Working in advanced practice of base role is great, letting someone with about 1/8th of the clinical teaching of a med student work as an ST3 or above Dr is certifiably crazy, surely?
1
5
21
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
There’s negligible Clinical Medical ed in ACP MSc on top of a nursing/pharmacy/physio degree If a trainee doctor (who has 4-6yrs MBBS, 2yrs FY, 3yrs Core, and RC exams) has all that and still needs Cons supervision, how is someone with a 45Cred module in Clin Med comparable?
There has been a lot of discussion re ACPs recently, with some defending that ACPs are qualified to act at ST3 level, I thought it’d be helpful to sample ACP courses. I chose two highly regarded unis (King’s, Edinburg) & then De Montfort to get a good breadth of representation 1/
1
13
45
What do you mean by “trainee Medic” ? Medical students aren’t allowed to treat pts, ACPs are in NHS As to ACP MSc content is way too less to work in Dr substitute role -in GP &A&E seeing undifferentiated pts, on Dr rotas etc ACP MSc even less than PA MSc
For further clarification, the MSc ACP is 180 credits. 60 creds HAVE to be a QiP for it to be an MSc, leaving 120 creds. Of this, 30-60 creds are Prescribing in most. So 60-90 creds for the rest of the course, which has to be shared between leadership, dev research & clinicals
1
10
33
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
They assume they can do what trainee medics (resident drs) do under consultant supervision. This entire notion of equivalency is deeply disrespectful that I’ve lost all respect for these non-dr roles. They stand against the medical profession, and drs need to recognise that.
It’s my understanding any overlap with medics’ roles should always be under the supervision of a GP/consultant, the same as any trainee medic, some of whom may’ve done their training in 4 years. I don’t think a 3y ACP MSc is ‘little’ on top of a nursing/physio/pharmacy undergrad.
6
32
1
138
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Residents’ strike action for pay and jobs in England begins at 7am on 14 November until 06.59am on 19 November. Check the dates, times and locations for your nearest BMA picket line 👇 bma.org.uk/our-campaigns/res… See you there 💪 #PayRestoration #EndTrainingCrisis
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Interesting that the @MidwivesRCM condemn the NMC for not doing enough to ensure rigorous standards in midwifery teaching All while they themselves continue to accept money from one of the organisations mentioned in the Times article Are all Royal Colleges the same?
The Better Births review (2016) should have been the moment when the ideology of “normal birth” was confronted and eradicated from midwifery education and practice. As a member of the review panel, I did everything I could to make that happen - but my perspective was not welcome. At one point, another panel member even wrote to my employer at the time, the CQC, asking them to put pressure on me to stop commenting publicly about the issue. I am proud that I resigned from the Better Births review for these reasons - but deeply saddened that we haven’t made more progress tackling these issues. Speaking out on this topic has always been difficult. The “normal birth” lobby - two of whose most prominent figures are mentioned in today’s Sunday Times article - is well connected, organised, and highly effective at vilifying anyone who challenges its narrative. I sincerely hope that today’s Sunday Times exposé marks a turning point. If the Amos investigation fails to tackle this issue directly, it will simply become Better Births 2.0 - and in another ten years, we will still be seeing the same patterns of harm repeated. @wesstreeting
3
20
48
Mary Whitby 🇵🇸 retweeted
Agree. On the same note, registered medical practitioner (aka doctors) roles can only be filled by registered medical practitioners (not even by 'medical professionals'...!)
Registered nurse gaps can only be filled by registered nurses. That’s what the research evidence shows. Lives are put at risk if there are not enough RNs to deliver and coordinate care. #safestaffing
3
10
46