"Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised the prospect that Israel was committing ethnic cleansing to fellow U.S. officials" "the phrase “ethnic cleansing” was by then being regularly used by agency officials to describe Israeli actions"
NEW: Inside the Biden administration debates in late 2024 that could have changed the course of the Gaza war -top intel official sought to cut support for Israel but Brett McGurk pushed back -"very likely" US liability -Blinken spoke of "ethnic cleansing" huffpost.com/entry/biden-int…

Nov 8, 2025 · 1:17 AM UTC

Shout out to Senator Van Hollen.
1
17
57
Replying to @AdHaque110
We’ve known this for a long time. Many of the officials who stepped down in disgust reported this over a year ago
2
Replying to @AdHaque110
I doubt that Blinken raised any such question other than as a hypothetical. On the other hand, we now see why USAID was dismantled and brought under the control of Marco Rubio.
3
Brett McGurk did as much damage to this country as any Trump appointee. A true villain.
1
6
Americans were already supporting that. They visited many countries in the region asking them to be complicit in emptying Gaza of Gazans.
5
Replying to @AdHaque110
US officials, “They chose to look away.” Utter, yellow knock kneed cowards. That’s the US State Department and USAID that chose to look away.
1
Replying to @AdHaque110
700 lines out pf 8 Billion people. Sad. Sad you are
Replying to @AdHaque110 @moorehn
What amazing powers of perception the former Secretary of State has. I guess that’s why he got the big job
1
Replying to @AdHaque110
Replying to @AkbarSAhmed
The Huffington Post article by Akbar Shahid Ahmed—based entirely on unnamed sources—by design or defect, creates a distorted picture, leaving the false impression Blinken and Sullivan had plausible deniability of Israel's genocide and ethnic cleansing. Ridiculous is the suggestion that it did not dawn on Blinken that Israel was engaged in ethnic cleansing until the "final weeks" of the Biden administration, with Blinken's question evidencing simply a "suspicion" as opposed to firm knowledge from the beginning. To paint Brett McGurk and Jacob Lew as running the show instead of being Blinken's bulldogs to silent dissent lacks credibility. Since the very beginning, Biden knew, Blinken knew, Sullivan knew, and Austin knew. As the Secretary of State, it was Blinken's job to know; and, of course, it was not difficult to know given the public statements by Israeli officials evidencing an intent to genocide and to ethnically cleanse. In fact, Biden, Blinken, and Austin were all sued in Dec 2023 as defendants in a complaint in federal court in California so alleging. In Dec 2023, South Africa accumulated enough evidence to file a complaint with the ICJ against Israel for genocide of the Palestinian people. Upon reading it in late Dec 2023, Professor John Mearsheimer concluded it was genocide. And, as the HP article itself states: "State Department lawyers told Blinken in December 2023 that Israeli conduct likely violated international law, per Reuters", but the HP appears to belittle this as mere "clues", as if Sherlock Holmes were still needed to solve the mystery. As early as Jan 2024, the ICJ and the US judiciary warned it was plausible Israel was engaged in genocide. Numerous US officials resigned in protest. State Department assessments were intentionally delayed and suppressed.
2