I'll give the answer I always give to these questions: "Because communists won WWII"

“Today is my 111th birthday!” “Happy birthday!” “Alas, 111 years is far too short a time to pay off my 80-year mortgage on Bag End.”

She's saying it works on her - keep trying and maybe one of you can replace Sunny Sure, he got to be the guy behind the Theranos con and you're competing for being the manager of her podcasting and influencer career but hey...

🧵

I have spent the last 72 hours running through thousands of arrest records in North Carolina. I've looked at something like 10,000 arrests. What I'm discovering is so shocking, so horrifying, it cannot be a coincidence. Hundreds of individuals are clearly being mislabeled in the arrest records system. It's not a one-off or remotely rare. There are hundreds of these, possibly thousands... just in North Carolina. The clearest and most damning examples are when a repeat offender is arrested multiple times and his race is obviously changed between arrests. I found at least 18 instances of this. Here's the kicker... it NEVER happens the other way. White men are NEVER labelled hispanic. Neither are black men. It's always hispanic (FOR WHICH THERE IS AN OPTION!!!) men being labelled a) Caucasian b) White c) Other d) Unknown Again, there is a CLEAR and often-used option to label an individual as Hispanic and it is deliberately not being used. EVEN WHEN the person has originally been arrested and labelled "H" = Hispanic. The 2nd, 3rd, 4th arrest will label them "Caucasian" I cannot think of any rational, reasonable explanation for why this is occurring, AT SCALE, in North Carolina. At the minimum, we cannot trust any race data coming out of North Carolina arrest records. If that data feeds into any federal system, we cannot trust this either. Even, for the sake of argument, if the data is NOT being intentionally manipulated... the data is clearly and wildly inaccurate. I am open to all explanations, but this looks like major data manipulation to me.

You see, because we intelligently imported *both* the Daarood clan and the Hawiye clan then their ancient blood feud meant that some insane progressive won the election and he can implement the Smart Governance strategy of giving more money to Somalis and ignoring it when they commit crimes

Just so we're all clear this woman is *not* saying that "actually, there's violence everywhere in America so don't worry so much about public transportation" She's saying "public transportation everywhere in the world is full of violent crime - that's just how it's like" Both of these statements are insane of course

I was going to ignore this stupid controversy, another distraction which is apparently being used by SPLC and adjacent to show there’s “antysemytysm” in the GOP. But I listened to the audio and couldn’t resist saying something because it bears on a bigger problem with America and the right at moment…first, listen to the audio. Then see that all MAGA-adjacent influencers got in line to say the guy in video has a valid religious objection and that this is why he refuses to attend a "Shabbat dinner." After listening to audio and seeing replies I realized it wasn’t a friend inviting him socially to dinner, but that this was a question in a public forum (which was videotaped but this post below deceptively presents this as a secret recording of a private conversation) regarding a mandatory or semi-mandatory "Shabbat dinner experience" to "educate" employees at this conservative think tank about antysemytysm. I find it absurd that such things as this kind of coercive passive aggressive "invitation" can be issued in 2025 at a conservative think tank and I find the answer both of this guy and also of the "influencers" lining up to defend him to be very weak and to miss the point. The fact that in our day after everything that's happened you still have to couch in religion your objection to what amounts to leftist woke HR bullying on the part of "Bethany Shonda" at a fucking conservative think tank is pathetic. And if indeed (in the remote chance) his objection was actually only religious and referred to the time of week (so he would have accepted the same teach-in on another day?), then I still think he should have gone out of his way to say something else. Like, couldn't you say, "No I'm sorry, if you were going to invite me socially in a spirit of friendship to one of your holidays I might be glad to attend; I travel all over the world and honor the local beliefs of many tribes and small peoples and even make offerings to birds and such, sure I'll come to your ritual. But that's not why you're making this invitation. You're doing this because we're all being held under suspicion of heresy and thought-crime and "antisemitism." This is no different from being lectured in college by a leftist professor or administrator, being forced to attend mandatory antisemitism or racism teach-ins with educational hour about e.g. black culture, and I'm not going to be subjected to this or be held under suspicion." Or anything of that variety. Had he said anything like that, I would consider him courageous, but that he didn't say this, and that most of "influencers" on here are assisting in this, I find very weak. The implication is that without a religious premise or without another identity-demand, it isn't acceptable to refuse the mendacious "Shabbat invitation," and there's not even the pretense anywhere for calling this out for what it is (and honestly you should all be writing any donors to Heritage, and I'll ask the few I know, who happen to have money, to refuse to donate until a pledge is made that all bullies like Bethany "Shonda" and the other ethnic activists are fired or at least severely given their OWN teach-in and discipline regarding freedom in a civilized society). Worse still, and this is what I suspect--that actually the speaker, or those around him, and many influencers stomping for this, wouldn't have a problem subjecting others to identity struggle and microaggression-teach-in sessions of their own, so instead of an atmosphere of professionalism and manly freedom (what indeed, does researching immigration policy at a think tank have to do with attending "Shabbat dinners" or any religious function at all??) you get everyone very sensitive about their own little gay religious identity that must not be slighted. Otherwise the duty would be the same also for any Jewish employee who cares about freedom...why did none of you at Heritage who are Jewish stand up and call out this bullshit antiracism educational hour masquerading as a "Shabbat dinner" invitation? On another matter, I don't know anything about Evan Myers, and don't mean this as a personal attack on him--he may very well be a good guy. Someone just showed me that the only thing he's written is a kind of review of my own supposed influence, in talking about Patrick Deneen's book...I think he misunderstands what I say and it's partly an attack on me from the point of view of Deneen, but he's not unkind to me and there's no venom as there usually is when conservatives write about me. So he shouldn't think what I'm about to say is about him. But this episode and the response to it is depressing in that in fact very little has changed after Trump. The fact you all have to pretend this is about religious commitments, instead of boldly standing up against HR-style intimidation antiracism hour ...I have to think that many of you didn't think this through. You are rushing to defend something because it's being attacked by bad people, but actually this is a very weak statement and position, a very weak defense of freedom. As for what goes on at these think tanks I find it repulsive. I was ostracized my whole life precisely because I DID often say things like what you see above and I was almost always the only one saying it; the result is you see I never got any jobs or internships at Heritage or anywhere else, and was almost universally avoided. By conservatives especially. Conservatives are and have always been weak and brown-nosers; and you're delusional if you think anything has changed. And I guarantee you that the so-called based populists in DC are the same types of people who went into politics before 2016 and you'll be very disappointed if you expect anything coming out from this world after Trump. This includes the leadership of Heritage who you all defended but who predictably folded and apologized, and whose content and output, should you have cared to look at it, is indistinguishable from the same religious conservative boilerplate that existed in the years before Trump, and is an embarrassment. These people can't lead against either the left or ethnic lobby groups.

"Ackshually, we've filled every public space with psychotically violent blacks and not *just* public transport!" isn't the own she seems to think it is

This is a follow-up to the Stanford Prison Experiment Experiment where researchers distilled much practical knowledge about how to get people to believe fraudulent experimental data - a resounding scientific success

This is merely a test of our faith in social psychology There's actually more reason than ever to believe in the truth of this experiment

Sweeney gets the male gaze. Swift gets the male gays. Sounds the same but isn’t

The GOP really, really doesn't want vance in 2028. They want literally anyone but Vance. Democrat, republican, they don't care, as long as it's not the Maga candidate. To this end, they fund huge, ceaseless astroturf to try to discredit vance from right

I think it's idiotic to overreact to a couple of elections in blue states, but a few thoughts: 1) Scot Pressler, TPUSA, and a bunch of others have been working hard to register voters. I said it in 2022, and I've said it repeatedly since: our coalition is "lower propensity" and that means we have to do better at turning out voters than we have in the past. 2) We need to focus on the home front. The president has done a lot that has already paid off in lower interest rates and lower inflation, but we inherited a disaster from Joe Biden and Rome wasn't built in a day. We're going to keep on working to make a decent life affordable in this country, and that's the metric by which we'll ultimately be judged in 2026 and beyond. 3) The infighting is stupid. I care about my fellow citizens--particularly young Americans--being able to afford a decent life, I care about immigration and our sovereignty, and I care about establishing peace overseas so our resources can be focused at home. If you care about those things too, let's work together.

People say the GOPe doesn't learn but they actually are using two powerful tools of the left so they must have learned *something* Pick your opposition - "this guy is the alternative to us" Keep up an idea bubble - "this guy is the *only* alternative to us" All this for the two-fold reason of scaring "the donors" with the boogeyman and to create some doubt about the only viable successor to Trump - @JDVance

>Foreign Brownoid Muslim >unpronounceable name >media attempt to gaslight you into thinking his dog of a wife is hot >elected by foreign immigrant ringers brought in by the Democrat Party >hack opposition cries that he’s an Islamist who will usher in Sharia Law >in reality he’s just a Gay Communist Pic unrelated.

Torn between “stop sexualizing my tight wet pussy” and “She was only 18 and 150 days old you sick fuck”.

Why don’t you go start asking a handsome man to explain his favourite war to you? You’ll be pregnant soon enough!

I don’t “disavow” Tucker, he’s still our guy, but in a similar way to the Martyr Made episode, it was retarded of him to bring Fuentes on. He’s completely irrelevant electorally (having endorsed Kamala to 0 effect), but serves as perfect fodder for neocons & leftists to seize on.

The “debate” now on X is between two factions of Never Trump called Israel First and Palestine First. Neither side is America First but whether it’s Bari Weiss/Podchloretz or Fuentes/Tucker it’s a discourse better named “BJC sissy hypno.” Both just really want to talk about Jews.