The more I use AI to code, the less I "use" it

Nov 8, 2025 · 12:40 PM UTC

67
93
38
1,369
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Overall yes. I haven't figured out multiple coding agents. The context switching is devastating. But my favorite workflow is claude code plan for 1 task, iterate plan with claude, tell claude to implement, code review, commit, repeat as needed. AI needs super strict guardrails.
1
22
Yep, it's like a competent junior developer
2
1
12
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Hmm, record a podcast with me? Would be fun to get a measured take on both sides
1
1
Let's do it!
1
1
Replying to @DavidKPiano
I think I travelled from one end of the spectrum to the other, but not sure in which direction
1
7
Left side is bliss
2
Replying to @DavidKPiano
I can’t stand tab completion
1
4
Why not? If it's clear what you're doing (refactoring, making repetitive changes, etc.) then the tab completion model can be more helpful than not
Replying to @DavidKPiano
overall agree but if you aren't using some agent requests, you're not at peak throughput
1
5
Of course, that's what the small tasks are for
4
Replying to @DavidKPiano
cope
1
9
Nothing wrong with being in the middle, you do you
19
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Are all these devs actually bottlenecked by their capacity to *write* code? Like the only time I actually use cursor anymore is to do something tedious (“find all occurrences of … and replace”) while I’m in a meeting. And honestly sometimes grep+vim+sed still feels faster
2
28
I'd call that a small but tedious task
7
Replying to @DavidKPiano
The time wasted to set up the ai, all it's context, check after every output and reroll the dice when failures. Wow
1
20
I like that analogy; it really is like rerolling the die, and if you get a bad roll others will cry "skill issues"
15
Replying to @DavidKPiano
At some point, you realize how much time you are wasting reading garbage code.
1
77
Yep, you're trading your coding time for reviewing time And IMO coding is more fun
49
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Eventually you converge on actual programming. The closer your prompt is to literal programming the better. Small prompts that give a single instruction are best.
1
9
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Yes. The pull request review bots can be good for catching bone headed mistakes too
1
3
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Agree. I somewhat miss the very early days, when we used AI one line at time. Because aside simple functions, one line is usually most it can handle.
2
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Good meme. AI is a lot like Dreamweaver at this stage. It removes a lot of annoying typing but you still need to finish the results.
1
Replying to @DavidKPiano
There are always people in our field who sell complexity for its own sake.
1
Replying to @DavidKPiano
Exact reason why i’m certain all these “multiple concurrent agent” posts are from ppl that dont ship shit
3