Clarence Thomas announced that he doesn't care about precedent and is making it up as he goes along. He didn't say it *like that* of course, because then people would have noticed. But I noticed, through the jargon, and explain it here in @thenation thenation.com/article/societ…
You want to tear up and redo the constitution dopey. You’re hardly one to talk.
9
6
You don't think we should write a Constitution with input from women and Black people this time? How quaint.
8
9
1
163
You’re picking this exact moment in time to do it? Then we’ll rewrite it in five years. And another. And on and on. It’s all we have. Don’t those tinpot dictatorships rewrite their constitutions constantly too?
2
1
I actually don't want to rewrite the Constitution right now, and I've never said that I do. You think that I want that because you have only heard of me (probably through the lens of other whtie folks) instead of reading what I actually write.
2
3
64
The person who wanted to rewrite the constitution every 25 years was the slaver's hero Thomas Jefferson. I think Jefferson was wrong about that, and most things.
3
11
108
What I have said is that *other* countries that overcame apartheid did rewrite their constitutions, instead of using the white apartheid one as the base and tacking on a few amendments. That's what we *should have done* after the civil war, but whites didn't want to.
4
19
145
I’m glad we didn’t follow Jefferson’s suggestion. I actually saw you on the view. I’ve seen you on msnbc for years. I may have misinterpreted your view slightly but my point still stands that if your position is that the constitution is garbage…
3
1
… and it *should've* been rewritten it’s rich of you to constantly bash Clarence Thomas. That’s all.
2
2
See, Rusty, if you read things instead of merely watching things, you'd know that IN THIS VERY ARTICLE YOU ARE COMMENTING ON... I actually *agree* with Thomas' position here. :)
2
6
84
I’m out of free nation articles for the month. It feels awfully nihilistic that the constitution *should've* been rewritten, it’s terrible, it’s racist, laws are racist, capitalism is horrible, government is horrible, thomas is horrible, etc.. I mean what are we doing here?
6
1
A slaver's Constitution that was written exclusively by rich white men during a time where women and people of color did not have political or civil rights *should have been rewritten* and that's not actually a controversial position to take.
3
9
96
It’s really a shame that our founders did not share 2025 values 250 years ago. Your worldview is so nihilistic and cynical. I appreciate you engaging though elie. My brother as cornel west would say. Hopefully you don’t think I’m a white supremacist.
4
2
3
I don't think my values of "regarding people as people and treating them as such" were beyond the grasp of people living 250 years ago. Indeed, there WERE people who know that the white people here were wrong in real time. We call those people "Black people."

Oct 2, 2025 · 4:52 PM UTC

Replying to @ElieNYC @thenation
Well let’s just be bitter and resentful then. Think the worst of everyone. Like I said it seems very nihilistic. Again though elie appreciate the time. Until the next time…
3
2
Reconstruction was a chance for the US to choose to be a nation about ideals, justice, equality. Instead what ended up happening is we reunited around power, empire and whiteness. It could have been the perfect moment to rewrite, and included the best ideals of the framers.
14
Also Native Americans
1
7
Slavery is still practiced in Africa to this day. The British empire eradicated it across most of the globe.
1
Meanwhile, black Africa had slavery up to the 1970's. You might be able to get away with your historical stupidity with folks who march in an Al Sharpton race riot, Elie...but you're not fooling the rest of us.
This is kind of an interesting point. If taken to the next step: what would a constitution written at that time by those people have looked like?