What do you know... My predictions came true!!
Predictions? Too much info on Z-A that should have been saved for the game itself. Or 75% updates to to Free-to-play games already put. Maybe Champions announcement/release date.
Hopes? Confirming that their will be new megas, without revealing them (maybe 1 will be fine) and rather the starters are getting new regional forms, Megas, or both. Also, Champions release date/more info, a new Pokemon Mystery Dungeon game, remake of Explorers or just new one (preferred with including starters that weren't in explorers).
Predictions? Too much info on Z-A that should have been saved for the game itself. Or 75% updates to to Free-to-play games already put. Maybe Champions announcement/release date.
Hopes? Confirming that their will be new megas, without revealing them (maybe 1 will be fine) and rather the starters are getting new regional forms, Megas, or both. Also, Champions release date/more info, a new Pokemon Mystery Dungeon game, remake of Explorers or just new one (preferred with including starters that weren't in explorers).
JC Kane retweeted
the Nintendo Switch 2 is a Switch Pro, and that’s good. It reminds me of upgrading from an Xbox One to Xbox Series X, where the UI didn’t change radically but the hardware was more powerful, refined, and helped play old and new games better. The Switch 2 doesn’t feel “next gen” in the traditional sense, as consoles are increasingly feeling like when you upgrade your PC components and get a familiar, but more powerful system
Now I'm not sure why you are so invested in this.
I was not being childish, I was explaining my points reasonable. I've already moved on from this. I suppose if you'd like to continue it with a civil discussion we can, but to be honest, I'd rather not.
I’ll say it again you have rights to your 5 cows, 2 dogs, and a cat’s legs. Until you kill them and dissect the legs they are the animals legs.
Civilly if one caused permanent leg injury to a guys Ox, it will never plow again.
He has to reimburse him with the value of a functioning new Oxen minus the value of his injured one.
He doesn’t reimburse him by giving him what his lame animal is worth now.
If the person was known to heard cattle to slaughter, and you cut two leg’s off…technicalities aside if the cows live or it impacts their meet. The loss here is primarily weight in stolen legs.
The equation doesn’t even tell you if the animals are healthy,
Technically if your an amputee or double you have no legs.
Being childish over this question. Suck it up
Like when someone holds up two fingers and asks “How many fingers do I have” and the idiot says 2- and the guy says MORON I HAVE 2 FINGERS UP, BUT I HAVE TEN FINGERS.
What color is that red car?
Which is a tad frustrating that for some reason I can only repost to people's comments my comment because I've corrected this multiple times already. When I was calculating I was in a bit of a rush so I messed up and multiplied by 2, instead of 4.
You have two legs, if you’re a butcher with exotic meet
You have in addition 20 cow legs, 8 dog legs, and 4 cat legs 32+your 2 is 34. So benefit of the doubt mutated cows?
Anyway you own 5 cows etc… by owning them and they are normally developed that’s how many legs there are but until you slaughter and remove them your rights to them are yours..they still belong to the respective animal.
I’m sorry normally I don’t mind a wise ass. But when you screwed up cow legs I had to be one.
Tbh, I was in the middle of something trying to do quick math and for some reason I did x2 instead of x4.
Yes, I am doing it. But I'm going on demention further.
YOU have those animals, thus you have their legs. And you have your own. Meaning, despite them trying to be 'tricky' you can go back and tell them 2 plug the number of animal legs.
I dunno about lesson. But it is in physical reality. If someone asked you, "you have X number of things, so how many do you have" the (wish I knew the proper term) You have is referring to the thing that was just said.
Maybe that the thing it reminds you of is a lesson. This one is designed to be a 'trick question' when based on common English speak, the trick isn't entirely right.
You have the animals, thus when asked how many you have, you'd technically include the legs of the animals, and the legs you yourself have.
I made a mistake with the cows (which I noted when someone else caught that as well) which is ironic cuz as I was trying to do that, I was hoping I didn't make a mistake in the math lol. That being said, while it was more designed to be amusing, my statement is still correct (minus the bipedal cow mistake.). Even if you disregard the 'own'. It says I have in both parts of the question. Thus if I have the whole thing, I have the individual parts of said thing as well.
