Sure. Okay. It was closer to the closest election of the century than it was to a “colossal landslide.” I don’t get why I should be beholden to Kamala Harris’ bullshit as my standard

Meanwhile, we’re supposed to take Mr. Miller’s word for it that Venezuelans in boats on the open ocean deserve to be summarily executed cause somehow we know they’re drug smugglers. (Which, again, isn’t a capital crime to begin with.)

2015 called and they want their question back! You're about a decade late in asking this question😅

Bill Clinton won 43% of the popular vote in the 1992 U.S. presidential election. The following day...

"it's nOT a CoLLosAL LanDsLiDE." What buffoonish pedantry...

Depends how you look at it:

Mandate -The Presidential race isn't a popular vote; it's the Electoral College. -Harris had 3.2 million more votes than Trump in California. Did Trump run a race IN California? No, because knocking a Million votes off her total there would be irrelevant. -Won every swing state.

And if only the media would treat them like liars and call them out EVERY time! Mike Johnson speaks and he’s lying. When all the media does is push back a few times but then at the end of the interview allow their lies to go unchecked then you all are complicit in this chaos.

The Electoral College is like baseball. You play for runs not hits. The popular vote are hits. Runs are Electoral College votes. That changes the strategy of the game. Trump made little effort in two most populous states & big cities for votes.

No one who receives less than a majority vote achieved a colossal anything And Trump has received less than a majority vote both times he was elected

….besides the fact that Trump planned a coup to overturn Biden’s colossal win over him in 2020. Trump/the GOP’s gall/corruption since then has torn the country apart. What’s really appalling is how many Amer’s have gone along with lies/hate against their own fellow citizens.

Only the swing states were up for grabs. He won all of them.

That's just basic politics that everyone does -- "my win was huge and it's a mandate!" Plus, winning all battleground states is arguably an actual landslide, even though 49.8% to 48.3% is also true.

And only 66% of the electorate showed up to vote. So Trump only garnered 33% of the electorate. And how many regret their vote? Someone in my family has admitted that.

He won every battle ground state. Every single one. Don’t wonder why people stop listening to you. It’s not hard to figure out.

The popular vote is not how Presidential elections are won. This is the equivalent of citing passing yards as a metric in a lopsided football game.

Need 270 EVs to win, Kamala barely broke 200. Popular vote count is meaningless for Prez elections, collossal landslide is exactly what happened. But go on thinking your alphabet soup strategy is a winning one. Normies appreciate the lefts political hara-kiri.

Which is one of the reasons we really need to do away with the absurd Electoral College. Trump still would have won, but only barely, and the illusion of a massive mandate would be considerably lessened.

Modern Day landslide. Look at other elections since 2000, this one was not close.

Nice "popular vote" red herring, Jonah. The ONLY candidates whose vote counts matter are Trump and Harris, and Trump took > 50% of the total ballots cast for either of them. He won a majority of the so-called "popular vote" (sic). So there's intellectual dishonesty Strike One. He won all seven swing states - not five or six of them - but ALL seven. All of them. 49 states moved redward compared to 2020 (excepting Utah, IIRC), and Harris didn't flip even ONE county from red to blue compared to 2020. So there's intellectual dishonesty Strike Two. The GOP won both the House AND the Senate, and Trump won 312 EC votes. If, a la figure skating, you remove the two outlier states - CA and TX - with the largest margins for Harris and Trump, respectively, Trump received four MILLION more votes in the remaining 48 states than did Harris. That's 4,000,000 more for Trump. We're not the United State of California, and modern-day presidential electoral bouts are NOT defined by the "landslide" and "mandate" lingo of yesteryear. He won a landslide victory and earned a mandate. That's intellectual dishonesty Strike Three. You're OUT.

Depends on the metric - winning all 7 swing states could be considered a landslide. Has it happened before?

Seems “colossal” describes Kamala’s loss far better than trumps victory. Not. One. Swing. State. That stings.

You’re not considering Democrat cheating, illegal aliens, and ballot stuffing - which has been so prevalent in our system since 2014, maybe earlier (Kennedy)

Consider that Trump just didn’t campaign in some states because there’s no point. If he had really campaigned in California and New York, 2-3M more votes go his way…but literally helps him win not at all. It was an electoral landslide…and that’s the game we are playing

Is this really an important point in your mind that requires a call out?

This is common yet dumb political messaging. Stick to the stuff he says that is actually new and bad.

Every swing state. 100%. Landslide.

Trump lives rent free in your head, doesn’t he? Is he speaking to you now?

Yup

Tell this to the 4,416 dead Americans. Go ahead please 🙏 If you are willing to making excuses and self justifications and pretends it doesn’t affect your world view for the rest of your career, why should anything else you say carry any credence?

Which swing states did you baby killing friends win?