[Quantum] entanglement is a “mystery” only if we start with a mechanistic model of the physical world. ~Robert Roseberg paraphrase of Hans Primas

Oct 4, 2024 · 3:59 AM UTC

8
15
2
48
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
Yes but... The transition from body to mind has not of yet been successfully conjoined...
1
1
1
My own view is that the physical is a community of spiritual entities down to the subatomic level. So from that perspective, we are already “mind” but not always aware of it.
1
1
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
I understand that for many of not most of us that the mechanistic model is the only one that makes sense. This is the relative truth or world. However the ultimate truth of the universe is beyond our concepts, interdependence instead of dependence or ontological.
1
1
Yes, although a good part of why it appears to be common sense is that that was the way we were taught.
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
I work from the reverse
1
1
I do too
1
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
Exactly. it's just somebody under the blanket with two arms.
1
1
Yes, what a great analogy!
1
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
Per me what is entangled in the quantum entanglement realm gets disentangled in the outer world. In fact a creative-corresponding dialogue goes on between both these worlds untill complete correspondence is achieved, at which both worlds annihilate each other n only One remains.
1
1
That’s an interesting perspective. I think there is an outer world from the perspective of our body, but not from the perspective of our being.
1
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
Clinging to old paradigms... 😇
2
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
As if brain cells within a superfluid.
1
Replying to @LisaChristiePhD
piped.video/watch?v=4nIlI7wa…
Load more