🚨 GROKIPEDIA LAUNCH TRIGGERS MEDIA OUTRAGE: "TOO MUCH TRUTH" While legacy outlets were busy rewriting history, Grokipedia launched with 900,000+ uncensored articles. The success was so beyond the curve that it immediately crashed from demand. Users say it's like Wikipedia if it told the truth. No spin on George Floyd, no RFK Jr. smears, and no hit jobs on conservatives. Just receipts, sources, and clarity. WIRED and WaPo are fuming, calling it “far-right” for quoting public records and court transcripts. That’s how low the bar is now. The media once controlled the narrative... Now they can’t even control the comments. Welcome to the era of truth. Source: Fox, Grokipedia, WaPo, Business Insider, WIRED, TheGuardian, @elonmusk

🚨 GEORGE FLOYD PAGE SHOWDOWN: ELON’S GROKIPEDIA CALLS OUT WIKIPEDIA’S BIAS Elon’s new AI-powered Grokipedia is taking a direct swing at what many call Wikipedia’s built-in political bias, and it’s doing it by rewriting how the internet handles controversial history. The first major test? The George Floyd entry. Wikipedia opens by describing Floyd as “an African American man murdered by a white police officer,” centering the event as a racial tragedy and catalyst for global protests. His criminal past and toxicology details are buried later, framed as irrelevant to the “larger systemic racism narrative.” Grokipedia flips that entirely, starting with Floyd’s criminal history, toxicology results (11 ng/mL fentanyl), and health conditions, before even addressing the protests. It calls the aftermath “civil unrest” that caused billions in property damage, presenting both the riots and reforms side by side. Critics say Wikipedia’s framing “programs emotion first, facts later,” while Grokpedia’s blunt chronological style strips away ideology and leaves readers to judge for themselves. Supporters call it “the end of narrative engineering.” Even early comparisons back that up: Wikipedia’s lead hides police officers’ race-neutral descriptions and minimizes medical examiner data, while Grokipedia cites it upfront. No “white cop vs. Black victim” framing, just evidence. Elon’s team says the goal is transparency over tribalism, Grokipedia’s AI curates “verifiable facts” without human editorial influence, aiming to “decentralize control of knowledge.” Detractors argue that this “neutral tone” subtly favors right-leaning interpretations, especially when race or politics are involved. Still, the difference is stark: Wikipedia emphasizes systemic racism and activism, Grokipedia emphasizes data, context, and consequence, right down to riot damage costs and autopsy reports. Source: Grokipedia, Wikipedia