87% of payment cards on the dark web are valid for 12 months or longer.
A worrying sign that the market for stolen card data is not slowing down any time soon. Check out the latest research on payment card data theft and learn how to protect yours. More info in the comments 🔽
Literally meaningless. You must be one of those that is sitting in cash since April.
Much more money is lost by waiting for a correction that in corrections themselves.
Def overvalued but looking under the hood NVIda massively outperforms Cisco. NVIda 57% Net profit margin, Cisco 17%. NVIda trailing PE 50, Cisco was 200… so if you suggest NVIda hits the same valuation it’s 4x today’s price at the peek of what Cisco hit..
Cool, let’s compare the earnings growth for Cisco during that time vs Nvidia now… and P/E ratios…
Yes, it’s on the cusp of getting out of hand but it’s no where near an apples to apples comparison.
Also, the Dot Com bubble was from ‘95-‘00. ‘26 will be another year of growth
The rail/steam companies hit collective value at over 50% of nominal GDP running up to 1900. The transportation sector grew 350% over a few decades while the US GDP grew 600%. Industrial revolutions don’t behave like the boring markets post 1965.
Why are you using Cisco and not Microsoft which had a Market Cap of $586 billion? That is more of an apples to apples that using Cisco.
Stock purchases are more about future growth expectations than actual earnings (once a company is established).
This was the top of $CSCO. They were making deals, had great earnings and revenues forecasted for future. When it ended, nobody rang a bell at the top. I would suspect to see the same thing with $NVDA.
LIVE 24/7! Everyday at 1pm Dubai time.
Catch our weekend NEWS Recap and don't miss out on interviews from Guardians of Bitcoin, Crypto Curious, and My Crypto Journey.
Follow, like, comment. Your take matters here.
x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnxeNVqd…
🚨CHART CRIME ALERT 📈
You can't compare the value of real goods and services bought and sold (GDP) to a speculative asset.
Real economic value = goods changing hands, ALSO as we saw with Elon selling shares of Tesla, your company might be worth $5T based on last shares trading hands, but if all investors went to the exit they would not get that valuation in real dollars.
So at best you can say is, "wow Nvidia is worth $5 Trillion! Jensen is really rich!"
It is kind of dumb to compare country’s production and asset value. USA asset wealth is 176 trillion, so Nvidia is 2.8% of it. If you like compare Nvidia’s revenue with GDP, as its revenue is a part of GDP.
So what? Why is this relevant at all? Is there a rule or natural limit on how much a company should be worth relative to GDP? They aren’t even the same thing. Equity valuation vs a measure of annual spend?