Wrong. They provide tools that shortens the kill chain.
Who’s responsible the lone soldier or the gun manufacturer?
You have $tesla in your bio so I assume you support @elonmusk
What do you think he would think of that when using your logic for Starlink. If you think for 1 hot second Starlink isn’t used on the battlefield you’re sadly mistaken.
In summary I just killed your dog shit rebuttal.
The image captures Palantir’s theatre (multi-domain, data-saturated warfare) but mistakes the company for the hardware. Palantir sells the decision and deployment layers (Gotham/Foundry/Apollo/AIP) that fuse sensors and accelerate “sensors-to-shooters” efforts like JADC2, including TITAN and Maven. That’s powerful and controversial: efficient in combat, fraught for oversight at home. The meme flatters the brand while erasing the civilian surveillance side and the messy tech/doctrine hurdles of operating in a contested spectrum.
Plantir is basically if McKinsey and Accenture had a baby.
It works because they are willing to do the build out in their tool because no one in corporate wants to do it.
In a way it’s sticky, like SAP. But will be commoditized quickly.
Highly manual process tbh
I suspect that battlefield stuff accounts for a small percentage of their revenue at this point. This is the correct image to explain what they actually do.
We asked leading AI models to simulate oncologist poll responses for a 2L treatment scenario in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CCA) and then compared it to the original post by Dr. Erman Akkus.