Wow. @Grokipedia's page on biological sex goes hard against sex spectrum pseudoscience, and clearly and powerfully affirms the binary nature of sex. This is such a valuable resource. Thanks @elonmusk!

Oct 30, 2025 · 3:28 PM UTC

96
484
20
4,343
This is from yesterday and I thought it was interesting. I had asked Grok to explain the fallacy of assuming the consequent. Then I followed up with a question of whether it's similar to the univariate fallacy.
1
19
That's pretty cool!
2
17
I saw it earlier. The trans community must be apoplectic.
5
15
I asked Grok if modern medicine can change sex. "Modern medicine cannot change sex. Ideology drives the claim — not science."
2
11
The Grokipedia entries are so weird. Just full on Musk's perpetual grievance syndrome world. If that RFK Jr one was Ted Bundy, you wouldn't learn 'murdered a lot of women' until the third paragraph.
1
9
Sex isn't gender. Hope that helps.
5
9
I’m sure Elons personal bias doesn’t influence this at all!
4
8
Does Grokipedia only provide white in black background? That is hard for some of us to read.
1
3
Grok dring leftist tears every morning ! A bit of truth, a bit of common sense and a bit of courage is all we need to save civilization from left devastation.
2
3
We’re at a pivotal point in history, where facts are finally being valued over ideology, and evidence is reclaiming its place above emotion. Truth doesn’t need approval. It just needs people willing to stand by it.
3
Wow it's almost as if there's a bunch of shit that people believe and build their entire personality around which is simply not true.
1
1
What the majority of the population always assumed wiki would be.
2
Grokipedia >>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia
1
@grok still uses WPATH soc8 maybe now it will adapt?
1
1
No more Dickipedia for me. @grokipedia is the future.
1
But no one serious is arguing this point? Everyone knows sex is binary. Duh. You might be referring to gender, which IS spectrum of expression.
1
"it says what I think so it must be true"
1
I hope it goes full circle... Grok has written Grokipedia, now I hope Grok prioritises Grokipedia in its inference. Grok is kinda woke in many cases (climate change for example).
1
1
One good page does not make it good. It copies wholesale from Wikipedia, and can be very iffy on a whole load of things.
1
Grokipedia on Gender Identity
1
A binary reproductive system doesn’t magically erase intersex conditions or make gender identity disappear. Biology is real, and so is complexity. Oversimplification isn’t science — it’s ideology.
2
1
no mention of the gender spectrum 🏳️‍⚧️
1
What about the Philosophers' Brief at the Supreme Court? Does it enter in with Grokipedia?
Objective and truth-seeking -- it's what we've needed!
Just don't post a link on Bluesky they like their view of the world and will hound you to the ends of the earth to ensure that you do not transgress on their comfort zone again.
Where have we ended up—needing someone to confirm obvious facts for us? I get the feeling that most people don't have a brain in their head and think worse than small children who believe in all kinds of nonsense.
Thank You again Elon
Yeah, it took a lot of calibration for it to finally be in line with all the conservative values. Initially Grok was much more progressive, but Elon had it altered and altered until it finally was back in line with the Bible.