Oh my god they made it real
99
252
73
3,467
Vladimir retweeted
🇷🇺 Putin’s most badass moment was him kicking Oligarch’s butt to help workers! Oligarchs were blackmailing each other and negotiating, during this time all three factories in the steel mill town of Pikalyovo stopped work and stopped paying full wages. Putin came to help the residents: “This is unacceptable, these are thousands of people you’re playing with” He forced the oligarchs to sign an agreement to get the work restarted and normalized the situation, threatening them to take away their plants. Shared today for Putin’s 73rd birthday. This is why people in Russia love him actually.
Vladimir retweeted
You call Mao a lunatic because you measure him by the comfort of your own peace. But you forget the world he inherited, a land torn apart by foreign invasion, warlord anarchy, mass starvation, and a Western blockade designed to strangle it before it could stand. When Mao took power in 1949, China was not the "great historical nation" you describe in nostalgic abstraction. It was a graveyard of empires. A country with an average life expectancy of thirty-five years, a literacy rate under twenty percent, and a population so exhausted by war and famine that even survival seemed theoretical. There were no universities worth the name, no unified army, no functioning industry, and no sovereignty. The "resurgence" you take for granted began not with markets or reforms, but with survival, the hard, dirty, collective rebuilding of a society left for dead. You say he "drove China into an agrarian grave." China was an agrarian grave. It had been for centuries, impoverished, fragmented, enslaved by foreign powers who took its ports, dictated its tariffs, and flooded its markets with opium. What Mao did was force that agrarian grave to awaken, to industrialize by its own hands rather than under Western masters. Yes, it was brutal. So is surgery after centuries of infection. You talk about "millions dead" as though famine and war were new inventions under socialism. But the century before Mao, from the Taiping Rebellion to the Japanese invasion, killed far more Chinese than any single policy of the People’s Republic. The difference is that before Mao, they died in silence and servitude. After Mao, they died struggling to be free. And in the span of one generation, life expectancy doubled, infant mortality collapsed, and a starving, illiterate people stood upright again. You call it "an unnecessary delay." A delay compared to what? Compared to the postwar reconstruction of Europe, bankrolled by the Marshall Plan, protected by American guns, and supplied with colonial plunder? China rebuilt itself while under embargo, encircled by enemies, and cut off from the world’s markets. And still it endured. By the time Mao died, China had achieved industrial self-sufficiency, universal basic literacy, and sovereignty for the first time in two hundred years. You mock "a colonised Chinese mind possessed with bitter garbage from a bearded European." But you misunderstand what Marxism meant to a colonized world. It wasn’t "European ideology." It was a weapon, a framework to reclaim dignity, to break feudalism, and to end the centuries when Europe dictated the meaning of progress. Marx may have been German, but the revolution that rose from his words was Chinese. You’re right about one thing, this is China’s time. But it didn’t come from luck, or from the benevolence of the West, or from some sudden wisdom that fell from the sky in the 1980s. It came from the foundation laid by a generation that refused to stay on its knees, that built steel from the ruins, dams from famine fields, and a state from chaos. The skyscrapers you see today stand on bones, but those bones are the price of sovereignty, not conquest. You don’t have to like Mao. But if you speak of China’s rise, you speak of his shadow. Because without him, there would be no nation left to rise.
Replying to @nxt888
Mao was a communist lunatic intent on driving China into an agrarian grave, until he realised later how stupid that strategy was - probably compelled by others and weakened by old age. And when he changed his approach, China took off. The fact is, his ideological obsession with austere Communist nonsense doomed his country for decades, and millions died as a consequence. It was an unnecessary delay in the inevitable resurgence of a great historical nation. The fact is that China's life expectancy, literacy, and industrial development would have accelerated far faster and far sooner with a wiser head in charge instead of a colonised Chinese mind possessed with bitter garbage from a bearded European - you know, the ones you rail about so much😉! As for all the 'if it takes a few million dead, then so be it' notions... It doesn't, and it never had to, and if you were one of them, I'm pretty sure you'd instantly agree! Death is only casually dismissible when it happens to other people, especially those long gone. Separately, as a European from a small European country, you will not find me apologising for the history of European Empires. China has no clean hands with respect to its own history, internally or externally. Brutality spans the entire spectrum of all human history and all human societies. The fact that China did not leverage its scientific, military, and naval capacities and its sheer scale is a matter for itself - take that up with your former rulers. If China had done these things, perhaps I would be on X posting complaints about the unfairness of it all. The fact that China might choose to leverage that power in the future may YET be a matter for us - but so be it! You won't find me on X appealing to some nebulous moral/historical/non-existent reference point to claim we were hard done by. As for Europe, we are led by Platinum Grade, Five-Star, Exemplar idiots of the most disappointing and strategically incapable kind! So, take it from me. This is YOUR time! Quit whining about it!
Vladimir retweeted
Replying to @DI313_
God has given knowledge to seekers. It’s not a monopoly to USA or West.
1
1
3
A 5-year-old Chinese child, who weighs 13 kg and suffers from end-stage heart failure, has successfully received a third-generation magnetically levitated biventricular artificial heart. The surgery set a new world record for the youngest and lightest child to undergo similar procedures, according to Nanjing Children's Hospital on Wednesday.
2
31
5
242
Does saying this make you feel better? If your most advanced weapons, with such complex and massive blueprints, were all taken by China, then your Pentagon and FBI are rubbish. You’re directly denying your own country.
Replying to @RealAirPower1
If there was no context I would say that looked a lot like an American aircraft carrier and fighter jet . Oh wait , they copied our blueprints .
1
Vladimir retweeted
Fun fact: China 🇨🇳 has accomplished the world's first electromagnetic catapult launch of a 5th-gen fighter jet from an aircraft carrier. This event will symbolize the beginning of the end for American🇺🇸 dominance on the high seas. #fujian #J35
Never forget American Hero Aaron Bushnell.
I've never seen a national leader celebrate their birthday like this. Don't you have anything better to do? Using India's influence to get these people to record a congratulatory video for you? If India has a future, I'll be damned.
Thank you for your kind greetings @BillGates. India looks forward to working together to build a sustainable and promising future for the coming generations.
1
1
4
Even in the wet dreams of Indians, they portray their country as a filthy, stinking, slovenly bully that rapes women, a disgusting str33tsh1tter.
This tweet is unavailable
So fast, I thought Modi could at least hold on until mid-September. Calling the other side "friend"—if you're the bully, it's mockery; if you're the victim, it's begging.
Deeply appreciate and fully reciprocate President Trump's sentiments and positive assessment of our ties. India and the US have a very positive and forward-looking Comprehensive and Global Strategic Partnership. @realDonaldTrump @POTUS
BEIJING, Sept. 3 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday demanded that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) provide strategic support for national rejuvenation and make greater contributions to world peace and development. The Chinese people made a major contribution to the salvation of human civilization and the defense of world peace with immense sacrifice in the resistance war against Japanese aggression, a significant part of the World Anti-Fascist War, President Xi Jinping said on Wednesday. He called on nations across the world to eliminate the root cause of war and prevent historical tragedies from recurring. Common security can only be safeguarded when nations across the world treat each other as equals, live in harmony, and mutually support one another, he said. The Chinese people will stand firmly on the right side of history and on the side of human progress, adhere to the path of peaceful development, and join hands with the rest of world to build a community with a shared future for humanity, he added.
Dare you invest in India? The Indian govt is basically running a giant extortion racket. Here's just a partial list of their victims: 🇨🇳Xiaomi - 680million(2022) 🇺🇸Walmart/Flipkart−680million(2022) 🇺🇸Walmart/Flipkart−1.35 billion (2021) 🇺🇸Amazon - 172million(2021) 🇫🇮Nokia−172million(2021) 🇫🇮Nokia−3.7 billion (2016, still in court) 🇰🇷Samsung - 212million(2020) 🇬🇧Vodafone−212million(2020) 🇬🇧Vodafone−5.1 billion (2012, ongoing mess) 🇬🇧Cairn Energy - $5.2 billion (2021, they won arbitration but still can't get paid) 🇨🇳Huawei - 121million(2022taxprobe) 🇨🇳OPPO−121million(2022taxprobe) 🇨🇳OPPO−551 million (2022 customs violations) 🇨🇳BYD - 90million(2023importduties) 🇺🇸Google−90million(2023importduties) 🇺🇸Google−162 million (2022 antitrust) 🇳🇱Shell - 1billion(2021taxfight) 🇰🇷Samsung(again)−1billion(2021taxfight) 🇰🇷Samsung(again)−101 million (2023 tariffs) 🇬🇧BT Group - $730 million (2022 back taxes) 🇨🇳🐸Foxconn - 725million(2023landissues) 🇨🇳🐸Wistron−725million(2023landissues) 🇨🇳🐸Wistron−125 million (2021 labor problems) 🇺🇸Disney−1.84billion(2022spectrumfees) 🇺🇸Disney−580 million (2023 taxes & censorship) 🇩🇪Siemens−330million(2021contractdispute) 🇺🇸Pepsi−330million(2021contractdispute) 🇺🇸Pepsi−160 million (2022 farm sourcing) 🇨🇳Lenovo - 118million(2023customsforms) 🇯🇵SoftBank−118million(2023customsforms) 🇯🇵SoftBank−860 million (2022 investment taxes) 🇫🇷Alstom - $275 million (2021 broken contract) ………
How India alienated itself from literally everyone: 🔸India's support of Zionists alienated itself from all left leaning westerners and the Muslim world. 🔸Indians flooding into Western countries alienated themselves from all right wing anti-migrant conservatives in the West. 🔸India constantly pick quarrels with China at the border alienated itself from China. 🔸India's poor treatment of their Muslim minorities alienated itself from the entire Muslim world. 🔸India's expansionist policies alienated itself from all their South Asian neighbors. India has no friends in the world. 🔸Russia sees India as an ATM, they have a strictly transactional relationship. 🔸The US sees India as a chess piece against China. 🔸Europe only sees India as a potential market to dump their cars. 🔸Africa sees India as the former stooge of the British colonizers.
Now China distrusts India as an unreliable neighbor, while the U.S. merely exploits it to contain China — never intending to let it become "the next China." Development windows are fleeting; catching them requires painful, decisive choices. India chose wrong.
Manufacturing shifts to India began around 2015, with Xiaomi and others establishing factories. Yet under Trump, India banned Chinese products and apps, seizing assets. What did this achieve? America lacks manufacturing capacity to transfer.
2
1
Did America integrate China without the Sino-Soviet split? Every choice demands sacrifice for greater opportunities. What has India sacrificed in its flip-flops? Nothing. You abandon principles for petty gains, squandering transformative moments.
1
1
the window for fence-sitting narrows. India’s transactional opportunism — grabbing benefits while fleeing responsibilities — proves its strategic confusion. Did China gain Soviet industrial support without bleeding in Korea?
1
1