This is incredible
The White House shared this Washington Post oped written by an Abu Shabab gang member from multiple accounts. Post then replied with a gift link. The oped was pitched by a pro-Israel PR firm. Israel backed these gangs. The rot is so deep
This is so embarrassing
On October 17th, at the direction of President Trump, the Department of War conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel affiliated with Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN), a Designated Terrorist Organization, that was operating in the USSOUTHCOM area of responsibility. The vessel was known by our intelligence to be involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, was traveling along a known narco-trafficking route, and was transporting substantial amounts of narcotics. There were three male narco-terrorists aboard the vessel during the strike—which was conducted in international waters. All three terrorists were killed and no U.S. forces were harmed in this strike. These cartels are the Al Qaeda of the Western Hemisphere, using violence, murder and terrorism to impose their will, threaten our national security and poison our people. The United States military will treat these organizations like the terrorists they are—they will be hunted, and killed, just like Al Qaeda.
All the people accusing those of us in favor of peace in Ukraine as Putanist: both Nixon and Johnson blamed peace protestors on Mao and Brezhnev. They were convinced of it, even though it was ridiculous.
This is incredible.
FULL REPORT: Colombian public media reports that a U.S. military strike on a boat on September 15—the second attack on a vessel by the U.S. in the Caribbean that we’re aware of—was a Colombian boat and was in Colombian territorial waters. At least one of the three victims extrajudicially killed in the strike was Colombian lifelong fisherman Alejandro Carranza. Alejandro’s identity is confirmed by his cousin. The Colombian boat was adrift and had its distress signal up due to an engine failure.
Wash retweeted
FULL REPORT: Colombian public media reports that a U.S. military strike on a boat on September 15—the second attack on a vessel by the U.S. in the Caribbean that we’re aware of—was a Colombian boat and was in Colombian territorial waters. At least one of the three victims extrajudicially killed in the strike was Colombian lifelong fisherman Alejandro Carranza. Alejandro’s identity is confirmed by his cousin. The Colombian boat was adrift and had its distress signal up due to an engine failure.
This was so predictable. Everyone who said the US held the cards here was absolutely wrong.
This evening, Vice Premier He Lifeng and I engaged in frank and detailed discussions regarding trade between the United States and China. We will meet in-person next week to continue our discussions.
This evening, Vice Premier He Lifeng and I engaged in frank and detailed discussions regarding trade between the United States and China. We will meet in-person next week to continue our discussions.
Extraordinary words by Nvidia's CEO. In polite terms, he effectively says that the chips export controls on China were one of the most self-destructive decisions ever taken by the US government: x.com/Yuchenj_UW/status/1979… He says it caused Nvidia to go "from 95% market share to 0%" in China, and that he "cannot imagine any policymaker thinking that’s a good idea. That whatever policy we implemented caused America to lose one of the largest markets in the world to 0%.” In a separate interview (linked below) he effectively says that might have lost the US the AI race. Because, as he puts it, "winning" the AI race means that "80% of the world uses the American tech stack" and that, given that China on its own is "50% of AI research" and "30% of the technology market", then them not using the American tech stack means that by definition America is "forfeiting and conceding" the AI race. In that separate interview he also completely ridicules the narrative - used by the US to justify the export controls - that they were to prevent "dual use" of advanced Western chips for military purposes by China, saying that "no government, surely the Chinese government, is going to be building their defense on Western technology nor does the Pentagon use Chinese chips to build our national security." So to sum up: in a foolish attempt to slow China's AI development, not only did the US lose its largest market, they may have lost the AI race itself.
Replying to @baoshaoshan
The irony here is fairly massive. China/MOFCOM are issuing licenses for REEs/magnets for US automakers, after lack of supply briefly closed US auto plants, but now the US 50 Percent Rule, which sparked further controls from China on REEs/magnets, has also impacted the Nexperia situation, which could now lead to closures of US auto plants. You cannot make this stuff up.
4
4
1
69
Wash retweeted
REPORT: The United States murdered two men from 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago in yesterday's U.S. strike on a boat in the Caribbean Sea, during the fake anti-drug military operations against Venezuela. @CNC3TV
Here’s my full take on the recent escalation in trade tensions between China and the US. China's trade restrictions and barriers in many ways mirror those of the US — they are strategic and carefully calibrated responses. Beijing's recent and serious export controls are about sending an even stronger message to Washington than before, essentially saying, “Stop trying to mess with us.” Many people seem unaware that the US has targeted China with a series of trade restrictions in recent months. It seems like they are too technical or too small to be making big headlines. But they have pissed off China. In many ways, China was forced to respond with force. One question remains unanswered: Why are China's export controls global in reach? I spoke with several experts about this, and they all converged on the same two reasons: (1) Once again, it’s a response to US actions. US restrictions are global (affecting all Chinese businesses), so China is acting globally as well. (2) It’s a warning to other countries not to follow the US — a signal to the world (especially Europe, as well as the US) that China wields tremendous economic power. The rare earths supply chain is a prime example. Overall, my interpretation is that China remains willing to maintain an amicable economic relationship with the US. But Trump continues to make arrogant and ill-informed decisions, leaving Xi with little choice but to respond forcefully.
Wash retweeted
A country with a strategic purpose and direction up against the United States is not a fair contest
Here's a question I know many are wondering about: why did China wait until now to use rare earths as leverage against the US? Why not in the first Trump administration when the US started the trade hostilities? Or when the Biden administration unleashed the chips export controls 3 years ago? I just watched a fascinating explanation by a Chinese analyst and, unexpectedly, a big part of the explanation is... helium. I had no idea but as he explains (source here: xiaohongshu.com/discovery/it…), all the way until 2022 China imported 95% of its helium and most of it was controlled by the US. Of the world's ten largest helium producers, four were American companies, and the remaining six all used American technology. Helium isn't just a party balloons gas: it has plenty of industrial applications for things such as quantum computing, rocket technology, MRI machines, as a coolant for chip lithography equipment, etc. In a nutshell what he's explaining is that with helium the US had an even stronger card to play if China ever used the rare earths card. This raised huge alarm bells inside China. In an article published in late 2022 in the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science (frontiersin.org/journals/env…), several researchers from PetroChina’s Beijing-based Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development stressed that China would be greatly affected if the US imposed a “stranglehold” blockade on helium exports. So over the past few years there were gigantic efforts in China to break the "helium shackles," with seven helium extraction facilities going into production, and China also switching imports from the US in favor of imports from friendly countries like Russia. China's research ecosystem also went into overdrive to find solutions to the helium dependency issues, with China's Academy of Sciences awarding its annual 2024 "Outstanding Science and Technology Achievement Prize" to a new helium extraction technology project (english.casad.cas.cn/newsroo…) because "these scientific and engineering achievements broke the long-standing monopoly of the US and ensured the security of China's helium resources" (guancha.cn/internation/2024_…) The result: by the end of 2024 China had cut its helium dependence on the US to less than 5% (scmp.com/news/china/science/…). The "helium shackles" were broken. That's what most people don't realize: power isn't about intentions or rhetoric - it's about what you can actually do. Many wonder why countries almost never retaliate when the US imposes sanctions or export controls. The answer is simple: they can't. They lack the alternatives, the technology, the supply chains. China is the first country that systematically worked to eliminate every single pressure point, with humongous efforts. It's not just helium: it's chips, energy, telecommunication, pharmaceuticals, etc. That's why the rare earth card can finally be played now. Not because China suddenly became aggressive, but because they have developed the capabilities to say "no." Last word: as a European, this is both depressing and inspiring. Depressing because it highlights the immense magnitude of the task at hand to become genuinely sovereign and develop our own capabilities to say "no." Inspiring because China demonstrated that it can actually be done, and relatively fast if we execute competently. Although with the current crop of folks at the helm in Europe, that last part is admittedly a very, very big "if"...
President Trump should first figure out what the US has been doing to China. Let’s set aside what happened before. On September 29, the US Department of Commerce announced a new rule that expands its "entity-list" export restrictions to subsidiaries at least 50 percent owned by a company on the list — a move clearly aimed at Chinese companies. This was widely seen as Washington’s attempt to create new leverage ahead of the next round of China–US talks. On Wednesday, the US agencies including Commerce Department announced they were adding 15 Chinese companies to its restricted trade list. On Thursday, the Treasury Department said it would impose a fourth round of sanctions targeting on China-based refineries that continue to purchase Iranian oil. In addition, the US will start to charge port fees on Chinese-made freight vessels, starting October 14. Faced with such a US, shouldn’t China show them a thing or two? Shouldn’t it make sure they don’t get carried away, knowing that China also holds powerful leverage to counter them?
Wash retweeted
Replying to @ISO304S
The accumulated tech export restrictions from ZTE/Huawei in 2018-19, Biden’s Oct 7 2022 and Oct 22 2023 chip restrictions and FDPR, the many escalations since, are more than poking and prodding. It’s kneecapping. Choking. Going for the jugular.
2
18
2
129
It’s called the Patriot Act, FISA, and CISA. Please vote no next time.
We need to know why @ATT and @Verizon did not challenge the subpoena for the phone records of 8 United States Senators when the Biden FBI spied on us during an anti-Trump probe. There needs to be a reckoning for this.
Just incredibly sad but predictable to see the US getting cosy with a former head of Al-Qaeda.
I met with Syrian President al-Sharaa about our shared goals for a stable and sovereign Syria and ongoing efforts to bring security and prosperity to all Syrians. We also discussed implementing President Trump’s historic announcement on sanctions relief and the importance of Israel-Syria relations.
Wash retweeted
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan argues that the level of concentration in today’s economy is making it easy for a president with authoritarian tendencies to control critics and censor dissent. With just five firms dominating U.S. media markets, censorship is far simpler than if 50 companies competed. She recalls U.S. studies after WWII showing German industrial monopolists helped Hitler rise to power, a lesson that led to the 1950 Anti-Merger Act. Decades of permissive merger policy, she warns, have erased those safeguards and left democracy exposed.
It is absolutely unbelievable that the head of Al-Qaeda in Syria, guilty of innumerable war crimes, is visiting the USA with a red carpet welcome.
Ahmed Al-Sharaa aka Mohammed al-Jolani's New York trip is "the first visit by a sitting Syrian president in nearly six decades." That's one way to look at it. Another is that it's the first visit by the founding leader of Al Qaeda in Syria since the US dropped a $10 million bounty for his arrest last December. BTW, that former Al Qaeda leader's government is set to announce a border deal with Israel in the coming days. This comes as the US won't even allow the Palestinian Authority to visit for a symbolic UN meeting on Palestinian statehood. Syria dirty war cheerleaders, this is what you cheered for:
1
This is incredible hypocrisy.
Replying to @msnmatt
Who, in your view, should have the power to draw the line between a “lie” and “free speech”? Government officials that want to stay in political power or the people that can hold them accountable ?
1