The fight is no longer between two political parties. It's between those who want to destroy civilization and those who want to preserve it. And I welcome anyone who wants to preserve it.

The purpose of sex is procreation. This does not mean that every act of sexual intercourse can or must produce pregnancy, but its purpose is clear from a biological standpoint, and all attempts to divorce sex from procreation result in social and spiritual chaos, and ultimately deep unhappiness.

My son is running around right now singing a version of "YMCA" that explicitly satirizes communism. I did not put him up to it, I swear.

Forest, Count Bunsoskovitch, Lord of the One White Paw. Also: The War Years. Lt. Bunzo in the barracks.

I know you're being sarcastic, but ... that's completely and 100% not true. Our enemy is that billions of dollars that have traditionally been spent on executing coups overseas, is now being spent at home. That's what we ideally focus on. At the same time, Nick Fuentes is the most retarded influencer out there and no one should platform him. He endorsed Kamala if nothing out of a stupid attempt to accelrationism. That said, I have zero interest in playing the game of "how many degrees of Nick Fuentes does it require before you deserve to not be cancelled."

I don't know very much about Thomas Massie, but I do know that there is absolutely nothing wrong with a person remarrying after the death of a spouse. Every Christian tradition affirms that death ends a marriage, and one is free to remarry after the death of a spouse. I am disgusted by the comments of people saying this is somehow dishonoring to his wife or suspicious in some way. This generation thinks nothing of divorce and remarriage, but thinks it's wrong for a widow or widower to remarry. It's completely backwards and a clear sign of a degenerate culture. If you think there is something fundamentally unethical about this picture, you need to think again.

People today really don't understand what it means to prove that something is true or not. They know who they like and who they don't, and they know what sounds good to them and what does not. That's as far as discernment goes.

We have a whole generation of people now who have been successfully indoctrinated into the idea that one of the most harmful things you can do is SAY CERTAIN THINGS. I beg those of you who are Christians to re-think this, and resist it. In the near future, you are going to have to stand up and say things, but because the people you need to reach have concluded that those things are harmful, AND YOU HAVE AGREED WITH THEM IN PRINCIPLE, you will not be allowed to say them. I'm not taking about "groyper" BS. In ten years there will be no "groypers." The fad will disappear, or our ability to sniff out bots will extinguish it. I'm talking about things like, the family is good, fathers are good, having children is good, self-determination and independence is good, reading is good, being able to debate and honestly argue both sides and reach logical and practical conclusions is good. Also, killing unborn children is bad, killing people with disabilities is bad, killing the elderly and infirm is bad, tolerating drug abuse and street violence and looting and prostitution and pornography is bad. I don't care WHERE you fall on these issues. If you agree in principle that we need to be able to TALK about them, then STOP pushing the poisonous lie that speech is harmful and must be regulated for the protection of others. It is the gateway to ALL totalitarianism.

So after a week of 3 view max per post or reply, I get told my account has a label put on it to limit engagement because of possible spam. I DON'T POST ENOUGH FOR MY ACCOUNT TO BE "SPAM." DOES X NOT UNDERSTAND HOW SPAM WORKS?

Clearly it's time for my bi-annual, "Ha ha, no one can see your posts" fortnight.

Does anyone remember how when Dennis Prager did his fireside chats, his dog would be crashed out in a little bed right next to his chair? The dog passed on from old age before he stopped doing those, but it was a feature for a long time. Is this part of the reason why Hasan Piker forces his dog to remain in shot? Trying to recreate by force something Prager got just by having an old dog who loved him?

Olivia Julianna: "Hey, I have evidence of Tim Pool trying to bribe me. I'll post it if you give me enough engagement." Tim Pool: "Post it." Olivia Julianna stans: "Tim Pool is bald under that beanie, ha ha." Evidence still not posted. These are not serious people.

Catholic. Protestant. Orthodox. We’ve spent 500 years tearing each other apart. Enough. Let's reunite!

The persistence of the overpopulation myth is driven by a basic hatred and distrust of humanity. I would argue that this is the real fruit of all the various cultural revolutions of the post-60's generations. We threw all the virtues to the winds as "oppressive" and now all the great cities of the West are drowning in drugs, filth, crime, violence and homelessness. Men and women have been carefully taught to hate and fear one another and don't want marriage or children. Consequently people hate humanity and want huge swaths of human beings to be eliminated for their own comfort. Millions of abortions over 50 years have taught people that human life has no inherent dignity. I've got news: when this is all over, we won't have Jane Goodall's ridiculous utopia of a tiny world population enjoying peace and plenty in harmony with the animals. Instead, the Western civilization that raised us up enough to even dream of a peaceful and prosperous world will disappear, and the entire world will be dominated by violent tribes and religions more backward and oppressive than the West has known since before Christianity. And yeah, I know people are all going to go. "Yeah well Christianity is violent too." These people have NO IDEA what is coming. No idea what it means to live in a society that truly controls them. They think totalitarianism is when they have to share the planet with people who do not agree with them. They may well live to see a world where they are not permitted to disagree.

Happy Bunny day!

On International Bunny Day, it’s Forest vs. Laundry.

The Country Bake Shoppe knew I was coming.

Watching lots of "Christians" on X crashing out over the idea of forgiveness was not on my bingo card today. I'm literally going to have to start unfollowing some and blocking others.

No. I am not going to ignore my loyalty to a team, side, or party. Getting me, and everyone who looks, talks, acts, and thinks like me to ignore our collective interest was the main load bearing pillar of all your multigenerational plans to subjugate, rob, and eventually destroy us. I was fooled by this nonsense as a teenager, but never will I allow it as a man. My political agenda, from this moment and quite a few years before, above any philosophy or principle, is "the left loses and western civilization wins. " Full stop. I will not entertain any position to the contrary, however hypothetical, because in your mouth, a hypothetical is just a trick, offered in bad faith, to get me to say what you want. I am going to take the stick you picked up and introduced to this fight, and I will beat you with it until you cry, and then I will mock your crocodile tears and keep hitting you. And I will cheer for others who do the same, and make alliances with them. Why? Because I know exactly who and what you are. You showed us, all those years when you were winning and thought you would win forever. Charlie was a man of tolerance, love, forgiveness, discussion, and peace. I am none of these things. The only thing that restrains me is a moral compass, and I have just seen that yours points south. I strongly recommend you abandon and disavow the left, and beg for readmission to western civilization. Because things may get very dark indeed before we end up at that same point anyway. I am no longer discussing anything with you. I am no longer seeking to persuade you of anything. I am discussing with others of my tribe how best to defeat you. Because your friends killed the discussion guy, right in front of his five year old daughter, and you did a fortnight dance in celebration. Go find a taxidermist, and get stuffed.

As I've watched certain college forums in which students virtually defend the Charlie Kirk assassination, I've noticed the striking irony and contradiction in their position. They think they hated Kirk over his "totalitarianism," close-mindedness, hate & intolerance. But ... They are far more guilty of these traits than Kirk. They believe people should not be allowed to have his views; that they should be shunned, scorned, deprived of liberties, and even assaulted and worse, in some cases. They are not only intolerant of opposing views; they can't even fathom opposing views and people who harbor them are evil -- as opposed to being in the clutches of evil -- as I believe many of them are. They are palpably full of hate, and they are so-closeminded they are incapable of even entertaining opposing viewpoints. Most of all, they are so totalitarian they'd make Stalin blush. Yet they remain perched on their twisted moral high horse. It's really unnerving to watch these blind sheep in action, wholly unaware of their ignorance, their malice, and malevolence. They have lost their humanity, all the while thinking Kirk's murder was justifiable because of his inhumane views. Yet neither Charlie, nor any of us who advocate that their speech be suppressed (by state action), much less that any violence be visited upon them. And most of all, if God forbid violence did come to them, we would not rejoice in it. How can they be so lost? To me it's comprehensible only in spiritual terms.

What planet do you live on? For starters: an assassin murdered Charlie Kirk for speaking. Your “imagine the shoe is on the other foot” shtick is delusional. The shoe has been on the other foot for a decade. When Christians are being publicly murdered for their views, and the entirety of the Democrat media-industrial complex laughs and lies about it, we know who the actual martyrs are: the people who are dead, not your Hollywood friends. But let’s talk about actual censorship for a moment. The federal government explicitly targeted @FDRLST, the publication I founded and run, for destruction. It bullied social media companies to censor both @MZHemingway and me not for our opinions, but for reporting indisputable facts. Regulators bullied advertisers into banning us. We were put on blacklists by our own government. Millions were spent on grants and software development to algorithmically suppress us indefinitely. As a result the censorship we faces and the damages we incur as a result if it are still ongoing. We sued the federal government for relief years ago and STILL have not received any relief. Where were you in all this? Did you ever stand up for us after we were explicitly targeted for destruction by the government? Any tweets or op-eds in support of an actual journalistic publication being ravaged by government censorship? Any calls to punish those who spearheaded massive and illegal government conspiracies to destroy entire journalistic outfits? Of course not. We are neither neocons nor celebrities in your personal social circle. But when Jimmy Kimmel viciously and deliberately lied, violated long-standing broadcast rules, and put even more Christians and conservatives at risk of being shot and killed by left-wing ideologues, you sure were quick to jump to his defense. There’s a reason for that massively disparate response, and it sure as heck isn’t principle.