🚀 Why These 10 Creators Dominated Vote4Creators ? and What It Tells Us About Influence in Web3 A look at the leaderboard shows a massive power gap : the top creator xincctnnq leads with 518M+ votes, far ahead of the runner-up TangS4189 (387M). This 130M margin reflects not just popularity, but deep community mobilization. > Patterns emerge clearly: Content style: Most top-ranked creators post community-centric, project-driven updates, often mixing humor, alpha leaks, and emotional hooks — this combination drives strong engagement loops. Network effect: A cluster of creators (like trader_alvin1, xiogdmonn, Eason_2099) share overlapping follower bases, suggesting mutual amplification — retweets and quote-chains multiplying visibility. Timing factor: Many winning posts were dropped during high-traffic voting windows, showing an intentional posting strategy rather than luck. > Surprises & Unusual Finds The engagement paradox: Some creators with smaller followings (like CandyDD) still broke into the top 10 — proof that community enthusiasm beats follower count. Regional pull: A noticeable concentration of East Asian creators hints at regional voting communities dominating the leaderboard. Big Bird_ and MEJ毛毛姐_ had relatively low engagement histories yet still landed in the top 10 — likely due to campaign-style support or influencer endorsements. > My conclusions: Community > Followers: Micro-creators who actively rally their audience outperform passive big names. Post with purpose: Align timing, tone, and visuals with the community’s emotional pulse. Network early: Collaboration and cross-promotion drive exponential voting power. Authenticity wins: Creators who show genuine excitement about their ecosystem inspire trust — and votes. @River4fun @RiverdotInc #RiverPts @GiveRep @mulerun_ai