Highest Bidder Climatologist/Infectious Disease Expert. Best Selling Author of “Why Most Democrats, Schools & Corporations Are Racist and Socialist.”

Joined December 2011
Replying to @JakeLobin
All history should be taught. But when you Only teach negative historical events about American history, kids are going to tend to grow up hating their country. We see it in the streets, the Democrat party leadership, everywhere nowadays. #97%scientistsagree
2
11
David Bradley retweeted
Whoever made this, it’s brilliant 😆 RIP New York
Replying to @XaviercMiller
A lot of people need to read this and they’ll understand what happens if Mamdani actually applies what he promised
49
288
7
4,952
David Bradley retweeted
Here’s what I think will happen in NYC under Mahdami. The free buses and government grocery stores won’t happen, they never do. They sound good during campaigns, but collapse under basic math. You can’t run a city on ideas that cost billions and produce no revenue. The only way to make housing affordable is to build more housing. The free market lowers prices, not regulation. Every time politicians try to control rent or force affordability by decree, developers stop building and landlords stop maintaining. Supply dries up, the quality collapses, and the few properties that remain skyrocket in price. Once landlords can’t make a profit, they sell, lose properties, or walk away. Eventually, the government takes over. Taxes will rise to pay for the promises, and the middle class will be the ones shouldering the burden. The rich will relocate, the poor will depend on subsidies, and the productive class will be squeezed from both sides. Thriving businesses are the foundation of any thriving city. When they leave, everything else follows, jobs, schools, grocery stores, stability. Chicago already proved this. Boeing, McDonald’s, Caterpillar, Citadel, nearly 70k jobs, all gone. Now they’re facing billion-dollar deficits, half empty schools and neighborhoods without grocery stores. I saw someone who lived in a rent-controlled apartment in California put it perfectly, he said his landlord could no longer afford maintenance so the pool was filled with dirt, the floors had soft spots, and the foundation ended up cracking. That’s what overregulation does, it destroys quality. People who voted for this will eventually feel the pain but they won’t blame the policies or the politicians, they’ll blame the rich for leaving. This conversation is always difficult because most people simply don’t understand market dynamics or incentives. In a free society, people act in their own self-interest. If you remove profit and reward dependency, productivity dies and the city with it. If you think things are expensive now, just wait until they’re “free.”
David Bradley retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: In a jaw-dropping development, DNI Tulsi Gabbard has confirmed an official probe into Anthony Fauci for perjury and his role in funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as part of efforts to uncover the origins of COVID-19.
David Bradley retweeted
Whoever has “Gary Payton II Next Arrest” slip might be rich
David Bradley retweeted
The left doesn't realize how racist they are
David Bradley retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Corina Machado says President Trump DESERVES IT. Liberals are about to fume. "I decided to dedicate it to President Trump because he deserves it! Because not only has he been involved in only a few months in solving 8 wars, but his actions have been decisive to have Venezuela now at a threshold of freedom after 26 years of tyranny!" "I INSIST he deserves it." "President Trump has been very clear, courageous in terms of dismantling these criminal structures. And on behalf of the Venezuelan people, I reaffirmed our gratitude and our commitment to this cause for the whole of America."
David Bradley retweeted
YIKES: Abigail Spanberger gives a 2-minute word salad defending her support for men in girls’ bathrooms and predators in their locker rooms.
David Bradley retweeted
It really is WILD how quickly Islam took over the UK… The US better wake up.
David Bradley retweeted
BREAKING 🚨 Antifa spits at a federal agent on the face and immediately regrets it. “They spit we hit” ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
David Bradley retweeted
When you confront a liberal with facts this is how they look.
David Bradley retweeted
Pediatricians collect $200–$600 per fully vaccinated patient, with some making more than $1 million a year. Definitely no conflict of interest there!
David Bradley retweeted
They want everyday people to deal with it....but no, not them! MSM is the enemy 🫵
David Bradley retweeted
Democrats are so used to media being their propagandists that they totally lose it when asked basic questions. Here’s California’s Katie Porter losing it during an interview.
David Bradley retweeted
Trump says he want to take guns away from trans people so now liberals have to defend gun rights. Just absolutely BRILLIANT.
David Bradley retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
"What Netflix is doing goes beyond a culture war fight. It’s immoral"
David Bradley retweeted
Watching Stephen Miller barbecue the likes of Jake Tapper and the other talking meat puppets of the DNC is divine.
David Bradley retweeted
WOW!! Trump just posted this on Truth Social
David Bradley retweeted
Matt Ridley, ex-science editor at The Economist, comprehensively dismantles the "climate crisis" narrative: "We know that in the medieval period, it was warmer than today... So we're not in a period of unprecedented warmth." "We're not in a period of unprecedentedly fast warmth. We're not in a period of increasing extreme weather, floods, droughts, storms." "The carbon dioxide we're putting in the air is having a very measurable effect that's beneficial... And that is global greening." "And yet, there are so many vested interests now in continuing to talk about it as a crisis... that I'll not get a hearing for what I just said." Credit: @mattwridley @triggerpod
David Bradley retweeted
I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points. I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days. Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them. However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created. When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said. The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness. Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison? I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges. The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest. Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.
“I think she’s going to find that you can’t sit on the fence... The real win is when ordinary people can say these things.” @DerryBanShee speaks to @joshxhowie about Emma Watson’s comments about JK Rowling. 📺 piped.video/r2OGEITYe2Y