If you haven’t watched Dallas Buyers Club, you should.
It’s not just a movie, it’s a case study in how public health authorities, regulators, and pharmaceutical interests can block access to treatments, even when they help people.
In 1988, Ron Woodroof found therapies that were working for AIDS patients. The FDA shut him down, not because the drugs were unsafe, but because they weren’t approved yet. Public health bodies prevented dying people from accessing treatment.
That was the 1980s.
Fast-forward to now:
• Ivermectin is confiscated from natural health practitioners, not because it’s dangerous, but because regulators don’t approve its use.
• Healthy ostriches are culled under draconian, absurd “public health” rules.
• Anyone asking questions about risks, alternatives, or consent gets dismissed, censored, or mocked.
This is not about health.
We keep seeing the same pattern:
institutions claiming authority over our personal decisions.
Meanwhile, people are less healthy than ever, products become more toxic, and yet these same institutions insist they know what’s best for us. No, they don’t. They’ve proven that.
Who gets to decide what is acceptable for our bodies, farms, and lives? A faceless bureaucrat? Someone in a lab coat we will never meet? I don’t think so.
Dallas Buyers Club forces a bigger realization: The greatest obstacle to health and freedom isn’t lack of options,
it’s the gatekeepers.
Regulators block access, approve harmful products, and silence dissent.
So what are we doing?
Have we learned anything? Or are we just repeating history with new labels, new rules, and more control?
Why do we keep letting them get away with it?