I use X to connect with amazing people and learn about extraordinary ideas. This is my personalized daily TEDx-style experience. Welcome.

Boston, MA
Joined May 2008
A tree 🌳 in your profile name indicates that you are honest, open-minded, agreeable, and interested in contributing to the mesh of ideas and principles that build us as a collective humanity. (Lack of a tree 🌳 does not imply the opposite.)
🤯
Okay here's the first thing I did with THRML by @extropic It's just a basic sudoku solver. Thermodynamic computing is a bit overkill for this task but I think since humans can actually do sudoku, it's a good intuition for what's going on under the hood. With sudoku, there are many overlapping constraints. You start with a partially filled puzzle, which are the initial conditions, but then other rules are: no duplicates on any row, column, or square. Now, with a sudoku problem, you know there is ONE singular solution, or a "low energy state" i.e. where there are no rule violations or collisions. So then what you do is you program those "clamped" initial values into the TSU, and you bake in the rules (no duplicates) and then, due to the laws of thermodynamics and electricity... it just sort of settles into the correct solution (this is "annealing") The reason I think this is such a good example of what TSUs do is because for humans (and classical computers) it's more or less a "guess and check" process. No matter what method you use with classical computation or human computation, it's an iterative refinement process of sequential steps. But, with sudoku, as you can see in the output below, it's a single step. That's because the TSU looks at the whole problem globally. Here's how I did this: ChatGPT PRO 🤣 No joke, ChatGPT pro one-shotted this entire problem. There were several refinements we made, though it was mostly around UI and validation (not the core logic). However, we did do an optimization step to make sure we were using the correct block batching from the THRML library.
Often these days, people cheekily admit to having used ChatGPT to do something that helps their work. I think the way they admit to it reflects that they get a suboptimal but good-enough result from it. In the future, GenAI will get better, AND people will get more complacent.
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
🧵 THREAD 3/3: QUANTUM EFFECTS IN MICROTUBULES - MEASURED In thread 1, I showed water protects quantum states. In thread 2, aromatic rings support coherence. Now here's the proof it's happening in REAL microtubules. This isn't theory anymore. It's measured. 1/15
4
9
1
63
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
In Science, researchers report the observation of dendritic nanotubes in brain tissue from mice and humans. The discovery suggests that the current understanding of the brain’s organization may be incomplete, overlooking a hidden layer of connectivity. Learn more in a new #SciencePerspective: scim.ag/3KFW8Ep
Here's the link to "Perplexity at Work" r2cdn.perplexity.ai/pdf/pplx…
1
Check out the new guide “Perplexity at Work," Perplexity's official guide to getting more done with AI. This doc shows how to fold AI into everyday work. Link in the next post.
1
1
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
A tree 🌳 in your profile name indicates that you are honest, open-minded, agreeable, and interested in contributing to the mesh of ideas and principles that build us as a collective humanity. (Lack of a tree 🌳 does not imply the opposite.)
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
Wolfram @stephen_wolfram might be onto something here😁 WOLFRAM PHYSICS in motion: Two competing feeders and and a predator. Everything here is a hypergraph...including the environment. We visualize a synthetic micro-ecosystem built on computational irreducibility, hypergraph rule-flow & emergent geometry. Inspired by the Wolfram Physics Project's quest for a "Theory of Everything". The full 1750 line python code is available to Gold members on YouTube upon request. @WolframResearch #WolframPhysics #TheoryOfEverything #ComputationalUniverse
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
Given the recent discussion about aging (and our approach to it) in x.com/drmichaellevin/status/…, it might be worthwhile to mention that my perspective is: birth defects, failure to regenerate complex organs after damage, cancer, degenerative disease, and aging are all *the same problem* at root. It is all about how living matter implements a collective intelligence to maintain a specific anatomy over time (whether regenerating from: 1 egg cell, a.k.a. embryogenesis, from a damaged tissue, or from the small-scale wear and tear of adult life), and how we can facilitate that process of renewal. Regeneration, in the broadest sense, is the answer to all of these problems. It is not going to be possible to accelerate (or prevent, for those who want to) anti-aging research without feeding (or squelching) these other aspects of medicine and basic science. If you're truly arguing against longevity research, it's not just the elderly billionaires that you're targeting, it's also the kids with cancer, the people born with damaged organs, victims of injury, those damaged by pathogens, etc. etc. It's all the same pool of suffering, with the same root cause. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
Final version is out: aging as the result of loss of goal-directedness advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley… @BeneHartl @LPiolopez "Although substantial advancements are made in manipulating lifespan in model organisms, the fundamental mechanisms driving aging remain elusive. No comprehensive computational platform is capable of making predictions on aging in multicellular systems. Focus is placed on the processes that build and maintain complex target morphologies, and develop an insilico model of multiscale homeostatic morphogenesis using Neural Cellular Automata (NCAs) trained by neuroevolution. In the context of this model: 1) Aging emerges after developmental goals are completed, even without noise or programmed degeneration; 2) Cellular misdifferentiation, reduced competency, communication failures, and genetic damage all accelerate aging but are not its primary cause; 3) Aging correlates with increased active information storage and transfer entropy, while spatial entropy distinguishes two dynamics, structural loss and morphological noise accumulation; 4) Despite organ loss, spatial information persists in tissue, implementing a memory of lost structures, which can be reactivated for organ restoration through targeted regenerative information; and 5) rejuvenation is found to be most efficient when regenerative information includes differential patterns of affected cells and their neighboring tissue, highlighting strategies for rejuvenation. This model suggests a novel perspective on aging caused by loss of goal-directedness, with potentially significant implications for longevity research and regenerative medicine."
AI coding tools (like Copilot in Visual Studio Code) *desperately* need the ability to roll back changes.
1
AI coding tools should: 1. Let you enter multiple steps at once -- it'll process them sequentially 2. Let you recover the full narrative of your description that built the application 3. Make these "index cards" portable so you can have other AI apps build the same description
1
Hot take: AI coding tools are too slow. I'm waiting for Copilot to finish before I rattle off 10 new things I want to see in this application.
Mitotic waves in the embryo of a fruit fly By Max Planck institute of molecular biology and genetics…all that is happening in a fruit fly embryo in a fruit fly egg… the universe is wild
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
Many of the most complex and useful functions in biology emerge at the scale of whole genomes. Today, we share our preprint “Generative design of novel bacteriophages with genome language models”, where we validate the first, functional AI-generated genomes 🧵
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
Unpopular opinion but offline Saturdays should be a thing. All social media shuts down just one day per week so people don’t entirely forget how to human.
93
47
9
1,160
Gen AI finds positives in your idea. “Wow! What an incredibly unique and deeply original concept! You’re not just thinking outside the box—you’re reinventing the box itself!” You need to ask AI to torch your idea. You need to listen. Then ask how to make it the best thing ever.
Constructing sentences is not a sacred act for humans, and every day we learn from and are inspired by the things we read. We publish stories so others will read them. Some people are concerned with AI scooping them up. Why? Is it the scale? Is it direct memorization?
Should media (books, music) come with labels that indicate whether AI was used in its creation? What if AI was used for inspiration but not for directly generating content? Why or why not?
1
1