most people speak about 150 words per minute, and read 200 wpm. most type about 50 wpm and listen around 150 wpm. speech-to-text is the optimal interface that gets us closest to thinking velocity. yet our thinking is mostly limited and constrained by our language.

Feb 7, 2025 · 2:33 PM UTC

947
910
296
10,403
Replying to @jack
I listen at 2X. Normal speech is sooo slow.
Replying to @jack
we live in a society
5
1
141
Replying to @jack
Ehh when I speak though I often say the wrong thing and backtracking or deleting/editing in speech is much harder, and oftentimes when using speech to text it is pretty critical to get the right words out, not just the most words
11
1
115
Replying to @jack
try this: listen to the audiobook of the book you're reading while you're reading the paperback too; better than sex (that I've never had)
6
3
1
47
Replying to @jack
Neuralink v 10
1
39
Replying to @jack
We need subvocalization tech. Air is a terrible medium for multiplexed data.
3
1
37
Replying to @jack
And I've seen English has pretty good bit rate when spoken, but has anyone done tests on which language has the highest data rate when read? Robert Heinlein's fictional language Speedtalk idealized having words that compose a sentence by themselves. I've noted too how much shorter Latin is to English translation.
4
3
2
29
Replying to @jack
Interesting! X should also focus more on voice posts and the ability to turn them into texts. Wdyt?
3
2
30
Replying to @jack
Yes, please. Don't send me voice messages. I don't want to have to process information as slowly as you think. Give me a text to read - I don't care how you made it.
2
33
Replying to @jack
Kaspa moves at 10 blocks per second
30
0
Replying to @jack
No. Language recapitulates the structure of thought. You have it completely in reverse.
8
1
1
24
Replying to @jack
Chinese allows humans to think the fastest due to its compact syntax and character based system. I can't speak it, so I think visually.
5
1
26
Replying to @jack
Hi jack
3
16
Replying to @jack
been using speech-to-text dictation a lot and really like it but will say that sometimes sitting down and typing / writing adds some depth to the thoughts that you don't necessarily get from speaking
15
Replying to @jack
“Explicit” thinking is but a tiny fraction of the thinking we do. Most is “inexplicit” (does not involve language). Almost all “flow states” are like this. I’m thinking when mountain biking on rough terrain, quite a lot, rarely in words. Language does not “constrain” thinking.
1
13
Replying to @jack
I listen at high speeds because it forces my brain to focus, preventing it from drifting. The speed I choose depends on several factors. On my iPad Mini with built-in speakers, I keep the default at 1.5x, but if the recording is clear enough, I can hold down for 2x. High-quality headphones make a huge difference. Nothing beats my old uncompressed-audio Sennheisers, but my Sony XM4s come very close. With good headphones, I can comfortably listen to audiobooks at 2.5x to 3.5x, depending on the material, the narrator’s clarity, recording quality, and compression level. Each app handles speed differently. Audible is the worst - it simply chops out sections of audio, making 3.5x nearly unlistenable. Overcast on iOS is the best, as it removes dead space between words while maintaining clarity. Overcast maxes out at 3x, but with dead space removal, it gets close to 4x. Audible, on the other hand, is a mess at high speeds - choppy and unpleasant. Speed listening is a skill, and I’ve introduced many people to it. Friends who hated it at first now can’t stand listening at normal speed. The faster it is, the more you focus, and the less you miss. Reading is another story - I lose focus and can take five minutes to get through a single page, while in that same time, I could have listened to half a chapter. I re-listen to most books, and for ones that matter most, like the Gospels, I’ve gone through them hundreds of times. I can finish the entire Bible in a week without any problem. As a Bible scholar, that gives me a unique edge. If you’re new to speed listening, start at 1.5x and gradually increase as you adjust. Better headphones make a huge difference. The Sony XM4s with noise cancellation should get you to 3x comfortably. For the absolute fastest and clearest experience, download from Audible at the highest quality, import into Overcast, and play at 3x with dead space removal and voice boost turned on.
1
1
8
Replying to @jack
Yes
2
10
Replying to @jack
Yep, speech to text is optimal, that's why we designed rabbit r1 like an AI walkie-talkie 😊
Replying to @jack
Neuralink incoming
1
8
Replying to @jack
I used speech to text to reply to this tweet.
1
7
Replying to @jack
People that farm Yaps write a lot more words per minute , but listen to even less
5
Replying to @jack
it's time for a new language
4
Replying to @jack
And if you can connect your speech to the right images, you can hold attention and maybe even break through with your message. I made this 9-min video with a new slide every 15-seconds and relevant narrative. See what you think... piped.video/watch?v=riJfLcDv…
1
1
2
Replying to @jack
Thats why you need to know several languages
1
4
Replying to @jack
This tweet is unavailable
3
Replying to @jack
I think much more clearly while I’m walking as well. This is another big factor.
1
3
Replying to @jack
I use speech for ~60% of my computer use, but there are times that typing is definitely better. A hybrid approach works best for me
3
Replying to @jack
Most CT people yap around 100 times a day Right or wrong? @_kaitoai
2
Replying to @jack
Actually I type 150 wpm
1
2
Replying to @jack
Here was another short video I did in 2018. 5-mins, 20 slides. I titled it "Before the Singularity" to talk about what we had to do with education & the media mess before AGI made it impossible to find truth in the daily flood of news-noise & imagery...
This tweet is unavailable
2
Replying to @jack
We’re talking faster in our heads than we can type out.
1
Replying to @jack
Siri is a crime against humanity.
1
Replying to @jack
Just 50 WPM? Wtf lol
1
Replying to @jack
i’m ready for neuralink brain interface to communicate my thoughts
1
1