“Heat pumps are superior in efficiency to condensing boilers, even if the heat pumps are powered by electricity from a power station burning natural gas.” Not me saying that but the late Prof Sir David MacKay. More in my @CarbonBrief article 👇 interactive.carbonbrief.org/…

Nov 9, 2025 · 9:01 PM UTC

Heat pumps perform very poorly once outside temperatures get really low. The colder it gets outside, the less effective the heat transfer capacity. But practical considerations such as this are likely of no concern to bureaucrats and the professors that take money to shill for bureaucrats.
1
2
Roughly the same energy efficiency but a huge difference in capital costs.
2
What did he say about the costs associated in installing one in a draughty Victorian house?
1
1. What efficiency do you assume for a condensing boiler. 2. What efficiency do you assume for a gas turbine generator? Do you consider CCGT units in the generation mix? 3. What are your estimates for transmission and distribution electricity losses?
1
3
Prof Mackay also assumed though that heat pumps would be combined with thermal storage to ensure they mainly used offpeak electricity avoiding increasing peak demand. We're largely not doing that, so switch to heat pumps only would have huge additional grid reinforcemment costs.
1
5
Please state your assumed ambient temp
1
4
Dont do it. They also need yearly maintenance
1
1
Doubt, electricity transportation has huge losses.
A professor, in theory...its wonderful. The Ford ecotech engine, the wet belt, so silent, so smooth, so buggered. When the RN type 45 engines were hagiographically described to a group of us, how do you change them? They won't need it.... £billions. Prof, not of this world.
Spend 7500 to save 120 a year, no thanks, they don't even work well in cold weather!
With heat pumps and EV's countries Will need more than wind power and solar panels..
3
This is true I'm sure. Also true is that heating an apartment building with a boiler in the basement is cheaper and more efficient still. But then the cost is communal not individual. Less profits. Less equipment to manufacture and maintain, less profits. Green means many things.
2
Heat delivered by heat pump? Boost required to deliver domestic hot water? etc.
Dont understand diagram. If U do comparision heat pump to gas. Gas wins. £, size, functionality, reliability, response times. Eg UK gas is 7p kwh. Electric mayb 28p. Even if heat pump 400% efficient price match. Response gas is instant water and heating. My hp HR to heat. 200c
6
When it is 50°. Not when it is -50°.
Have professor read operation data
In general, yes. But if electricity price is 3x the natural gas price, it needs to be 3x more efficient.
1
This may well be true. But it’s utterly irrelevant if electricity costs 4x gas per kWh
9
By efficiency you mean energy and not money I assume
6
Heat pumps work efficiently and effectively up to about -20c , I’ve had 3 for well over a decade , keep them clean and with minimum fuss they are great. I’ve no agenda other than to say this has been my experience with them. All in all , a good investment.
We know that but, most people's life style has heating off in empty house and quick blast on return. Accept house built like thermos flask can hold heat but who lives like that. New house to best standards heat pump is viable. Most houses even with typical botched upgrade aren't
3
Mire Lies from the Leftards.
1
But I must correct what I’ve said - current electricity / energy prices in the UK make the current heat pump situation not economically viable. With lower prices , heat pumps really are great. So blame Ed Miliband that asshole .
2
They would naturally be more efficient in a strict sense but do they have the capacity to emit the same amount of heat reliably and on-demand throughout the year?
Totally against Net Zero and this climate crisis bullshit , but the heat pump argument is not the hill to die on. They work great , give off reliable heat in the winter , cool in the summer , fairly maintenance free and ultimately are cheaper than boilers.
heat pump are trash, last maybe 10 years trouble free if your lucky, vs gas that can go 20 easy with no maintenance, who is pushing this crap ?
13
And when it’s windy in the UK, the running costs of a heat pump are even lower than that of the most efficient gas boiler 🇬🇧 💚☺️
Cost, Energy and Comfort Comparison [11 Days | 28 Oct 25 to 7 Nov 25] Heat Pump (Agile) was cheaper by £0.44 (2.5 %) vs Boiler (Tracker), or £3.72 after offsetting £3.28 gas stand. charge (11 d × £0.299)🥇🎉 Prices based on @OctopusEnergy tariffs 💚
1
ok use something else besides gas to get our electricity from seeing as we have forgotten about nuclear maybe they start using coal for winter electricity instead of gas and creating a fund that is designed only to make nuclear power plants for the future.
UK maximum heat load 200GW, so where is the extra 50GW generation to drive them ? Plus another 50GW for EV's and storage to cope with 4 day winter wind droughts ? Cherry picking without understanding what McKay said is blind optimism.
carbon brief😂😂😂 a highly partisan propaganda mouthpiece for the greentard industry f%ck the f$ck off and when you have finished f$cking the f%ck off... THEN RINSE AND F@CKING REPEAT
2
That's pure crap, It takes an average of 7.5 cubic feet of natural gas (7,777.5 Btus) to generate one kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity 3,400 BTUs that same natural gas in a modern furnace 90% efficiency puts 6,999.75 Btus into your home or over 2 times more efficient.
Compelling analysis-clarity like this is exactly what we need to drive real change in heating. Evidence for heat pump efficiency is a game changer for policy and public understanding.
1
doesn't get around the fact that the expenditure payback is 20 years and it will have worn out in 10
1
Anybody can ask AI the cost. Informing the massive installation cost of a heat pump: a large 4 bed house would cost £3k per year as a heat pump and £2k as gas boiler. Gas is cheaper than electricity for heating. And you’ll be a lot warmer!!