Founder @teamSundial. Angel investor. Author of "The Making of a Manager" amzn.to/2PRwCyW. Obsessed with systems. Design + data person.

Bay Area, CA
Joined November 2008
My book “The Making of a Manager” is out today 🎉 It’s everything I wish I’d known when I became a manager at the age of 25. Know someone who might benefit from it or looking for a refresher for yourself? Please help me spread the word! buff.ly/2TMsPVh
Been working on this on and off for the past two months: lg.substack.com/p/the-lost-a…
tl;dr: a lot of people in tech, like me, find it hard to sit with real feelings.
2
4
0
Julie Zhuo retweeted
If you feel inclined to show us some love, please go to news.ycombinator.com/show, and then find my post and upvote. "Show HN: An AI to match your voice to songs and artists you should sing"
2
11
39
Julie Zhuo retweeted
I’ve designed software, backed startups and helped founders. Now I’m writing fiction. This piece is from a collection of fables I began this year. How we do one thing is how we do everything. For people with 11 quiet minutes. Enjoy. docs.soleio.com/keeper
Most product convos are B- because people instinctively try to answer "why does this add value?" rather than "why is this the most valuable thing to do right now?" The first q is easy. The second q is hard but also what really matters if you wanna get good at product.
“When our ancestors weren’t spilling blood they were spilling tea.” Way to go @jasonyuandesign! Can’t wait to see your creativity on this problem.
I'm starting a new company to go all in on Social Intelligence. This is a deeply personal mission to me, one that feels like the inevitable culmination of everything I've ever worked on. I wrote a manifesto about why:
2
1
21
This event was also so fun because @soleio is one of the deepest conversationalists, and SPC is a beacon for creative and curious founders. Afterwards I got a compliment that made so happy at this stage in my life: “That talk made me feel relaxed, not more anxious.”
Building products should be fun. And it can be! Last week, @joulee stopped by SPC to chat about all things data & design with @soleio.
3
3
48
You can buy this!!!!
so we raised a new round, but haven't told anyone yet our investors are like, hey put our money to use how come burn isn't going up i gotchu fam introducing burn rate by runway an award winning, blind taste-tested (by me!) hot sauce, wrapped in a genuine $100 bill for $13.99
1
3
“Holy shit does this hot sauce include a real $100?!” <— my reaction upon receiving @runwayco’s latest gift. (The answer: yes.) @blader you warned me this would be good and you were absolutely right! 🎩
I wake up every morning excited to work on interesting problems with people I like.
tell me how rich u are without actually telling me.
Julie Zhuo retweeted
First thing I do when I start an engagement with any company is audit their analytics and tracking. You can model the most important funnels and behaviors in almost any product in < 20 key events.
Most companies are *vastly* overcomplicating their analytics. Everything is tracked clicks, scrolls, impressions, events. Which is fine. Logging is cheap. We also need them when we need to understand rare phenomena. But attention isn’t cheap. Most of what we track never helps us make better decisions. The truth is, only about 100 metrics really matter. These 100 metrics explain 90% of what’s happening in your business and product. And the same principle holds elsewhere too: Only 50 events truly matter for understanding user and system behavior. Only 150 entity characteristics — the key attributes of your users, products, or content — explain most outcomes. Everything else lives in the long tail: useful for special cases, but not essential for running the business on a daily basis. This is because everybusiness can be represented as a system, and these systems can be written as a set of equations. When you express your business as equations, you expose its levers. These levers are potentially actionable and can actually move results. Take Facebook’s revenue model. It can be simplified into four components: 1. Revenue = Users × Impressions per User × Ad Impressions per Impression × Revenue per Ad That’s it. Four levers at the highest level. To grow revenue, you can: 1. Increase users (growth) 2. Increase engagement (more impressions per user) 3. Raise ad load (more ads per impression) 4. Improve monetization (revenue per ad) Each of these can be broken down further. Let’s choose Monthly Active Users (MAU) as a proxy for growth. You can decompose MAU by an equation. MAU = New Users + Retained Users + Resurrected Users You can also grow your active users by getting new users, resurrecting churned users and keeping the existing users from churning. Now, let’s go one layer deeper. New Users = Visitors × (Downloads / Visitors) × (App Opens / Downloads) × (Registrations / App Opens) × (New Users / Registrations) If we define a new user as someone who registers and then takes an action, growth comes from improving each step of that journey. We can bring in more visitors at the top of the funnel, get more of them to download the app, increase the share who open it, raise the percentage who register, and finally help more of them take their first action. Each step is measurable. Each can be improved. Each has a story behind it. And if you want, you can keep peeling — looking at funnel drop-offs, activation, or engagement drivers. This is the beauty of decomposition. When you break the system into equations, you can see what drives what. After you do this for the key levers of your business, add all your metrics up. I'd be surprised if what *truly* matters is more than 100 metrics. More on our latest post in Opinionated Intelligence dot substak.
2
13
Most companies are *vastly* overcomplicating their analytics. Everything is tracked clicks, scrolls, impressions, events. Which is fine. Logging is cheap. We also need them when we need to understand rare phenomena. But attention isn’t cheap. Most of what we track never helps us make better decisions. The truth is, only about 100 metrics really matter. These 100 metrics explain 90% of what’s happening in your business and product. And the same principle holds elsewhere too: Only 50 events truly matter for understanding user and system behavior. Only 150 entity characteristics — the key attributes of your users, products, or content — explain most outcomes. Everything else lives in the long tail: useful for special cases, but not essential for running the business on a daily basis. This is because everybusiness can be represented as a system, and these systems can be written as a set of equations. When you express your business as equations, you expose its levers. These levers are potentially actionable and can actually move results. Take Facebook’s revenue model. It can be simplified into four components: 1. Revenue = Users × Impressions per User × Ad Impressions per Impression × Revenue per Ad That’s it. Four levers at the highest level. To grow revenue, you can: 1. Increase users (growth) 2. Increase engagement (more impressions per user) 3. Raise ad load (more ads per impression) 4. Improve monetization (revenue per ad) Each of these can be broken down further. Let’s choose Monthly Active Users (MAU) as a proxy for growth. You can decompose MAU by an equation. MAU = New Users + Retained Users + Resurrected Users You can also grow your active users by getting new users, resurrecting churned users and keeping the existing users from churning. Now, let’s go one layer deeper. New Users = Visitors × (Downloads / Visitors) × (App Opens / Downloads) × (Registrations / App Opens) × (New Users / Registrations) If we define a new user as someone who registers and then takes an action, growth comes from improving each step of that journey. We can bring in more visitors at the top of the funnel, get more of them to download the app, increase the share who open it, raise the percentage who register, and finally help more of them take their first action. Each step is measurable. Each can be improved. Each has a story behind it. And if you want, you can keep peeling — looking at funnel drop-offs, activation, or engagement drivers. This is the beauty of decomposition. When you break the system into equations, you can see what drives what. After you do this for the key levers of your business, add all your metrics up. I'd be surprised if what *truly* matters is more than 100 metrics. More on our latest post in Opinionated Intelligence dot substak.
Looking forward to hanging with my pal @soleio and the @southpkcommons community this week!
Good news: This Thursday I’m sitting down with @joulee to do a deep dive on the intersection of data and design. She’s going to walk us through her product and leadership insights as cofounder @TeamSundial Live from @southpkcommons SF at 2pm Pacific. Request an invite below.
1
1
34
Julie Zhuo retweeted
If you want your generations to feel designed and not…generated We hid a few invite codes to @variantui in this video The first 100 get unlimited credits, reply for a hint
All good things contain the seeds of their destruction. Don’t believe me? Give me a strength and I’ll show you how it’s also a weakness.
7
1
23
Death by a thousand dashboards Dashboards were supposed to be our saviors, promising the professionalism of a plane cockpit with clean gauges, clear dials, and a single view of what’s going on. One glance, and you’d know if your product or business was flying smoothly. That was the dream. The reality is the feeling of being trapped in a control room with 10,000 blinking screens. No clarity, just chaos. Here’s what life in dashboard hell actually looks like: 1. Conflicting truths. You open five dashboards and get five different numbers for the same metric. Which one do you believe? 2. Endless scavenger hunts. To answer a simple question, you have to stitch together views from multiple dashboards. If you want to understand whether weekly active users are growing among U.S. iOS users who are male and between 13–17 years old, you might need four separate dashboards. There’s no fast way to drill down. 3. Surface, not depth. Dashboards often tell you what happened, but not why. Metrics go up or down, but the root cause stays hidden. 4. Cognitive overload. The sheer number of dashboards creates noise. Teams spend more time trawling for useful signals than making decisions. 5. Lack of trust. With no single source of truth, dashboards stop being instruments of confidence and start being sources of debate. The answer isn’t “just one more dashboard,” it’s a reinvention of how insights and analysis are told, not just shown. Dashboards need to stop being static grids of KPIs and start becoming living narratives that answer questions. What does this look like? Read more on Opinionated Intelligence, our new Substack on the art and science of analytics: opinionatedintelligence dot substack dot com.
All those tech bros be showing off their ARR but what the ladies really want to see is your churn numbers and some big NRR.
16
3
1
111
My goal in life rn is to wake up excited to work on interesting problems with people I like. Want to come automate decision science + analytics with me? @TeamSundial has a lot of open roles!
2
12
0
Julie Zhuo retweeted
How can AI startups raise capital at sky-high valuations while losing money? Because investors are betting on future dominance, not current P&L. Thread:
Diagnose with data. Treat with design. One is the yin and the other the yang. They follow each other in an infinite cycle. Data is the process of deeply understanding reality as it *is*. Design is the process of designing future reality as it *could be*.