JUST IN: The Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to stop — by 9:30 tonight — the court orders requiring payment of full November SNAP benefits.

Nov 8, 2025 · 12:03 AM UTC

Replying to @kyledcheney
Has anyone pointed out that the Trump lawsuit to stop SNAP is against THE RHODE ISLAND STATE COUNCIL OF CHURCHES!
Replying to @kyledcheney
People talk about due process but forget how much of government turns on late-night emergency filings. When leaders treat food aid for millions as a chess piece on a 9:30pm clock, that tells you where their priorities really are. The urgency is never for you. It's always for the system to protect itself.
Replying to @kyledcheney
🇺🇸 🇺🇸
8
Replying to @kyledcheney
He hates the poor so much yet they voted for him in droves smh.
4
5
Replying to @kyledcheney
They always find money for billionaires and border walls, but feeding families is where they draw the line.
8
14
107
Replying to @kyledcheney
The lower court actually stalled and waited til the last second in order to prevent the DOJ from responding during business hours. DOJ wasn’t having it. 😂 DOJ doesn’t operate like the courts. 😭😭😭
1
2
Replying to @kyledcheney
For once, I hope the SC will uphold the law. And not bend the knee Trump.
5
@kyledcheney this is intentional…The administration is deliberately letting SNAP benefits run aground to trigger a judicial confrontation over executive control during shutdowns. They want to provoke a lawsuit. Why? Because it creates a courtroom opening to legitimize selective enforcement of welfare during a “lapse in appropriations.” This is what they’re gunning for: A legal doctrine that allows them to say: “We’re not killing the program, we just don’t have the funds to pay it and we have discretion on how to ration what little we have.” They’re trying to establish that even “mandatory” welfare programs become subject to executive reinterpretation once a shutdown begins. they’re trying to assert that shutdowns override previously passed spending laws. If a court backs this? Boom: Medicaid, Social Security, unemployment insurance all can be argued to be “optional during crises” if Congress is gridlocked. In other words, we’re one appeal away from agencies being able to “interpret” their way out of feeding people. If that APPEAL ruling gets overturned later, then executive agencies will have precedent to nullify benefit programs in emergencies without repealing them.
Replying to @kyledcheney
Our country is run by sadistic ghouls like @StephenM
1
18
Replying to @kyledcheney
He's literally challenging a council of Christian churches who just want to make sure no American goes hungry. How's that not a headline? He's just "to hell with optics" at this point.
2
2
Replying to @kyledcheney
Trump is correct to question the $100 billion SNAP program. A third of states have LESS than 80% of their poor on SNAP. One of the richest states, Massachusetts, has 50% MORE on SNAP than are poor.
Replying to @kyledcheney
Playing with peoples' food security, refusing to "provide for the general welfare" is unconscionable. SCOTUS: JUST SAY NO! There were no hardships in paying Argentina $40b. There is absolutely no excuse to not pay. We can no longer assume "in good faith" that there is a hardship or obstacle to overcome.
1
Replying to @kyledcheney
The only "funding" that should stop is the paychecks to congress
Replying to @kyledcheney
@Grok is this information accurate?
Replying to @kyledcheney
They have $40 billion for the Argentinian Labubu, but sorry, Nanna's gonna have to eat Frieskies
2
5
Replying to @kyledcheney
Sooner or later these rogue judges will have to be removed.
1
8
Replying to @kyledcheney
Lmfaoooo it’s like Trump is trying to get people to hate him this is truly remarkable.
10
Replying to @kyledcheney
Thanksgiving a few weeks away at that...😒
1
21
Replying to @kyledcheney
"SCOTUS NEEDS TO LET ME STARVE CHILDREN, IF THEY DON'T THEN THEY'RE PART OF THE WOKE LIBERAL AGENDA! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!"
1
2
13
Replying to @kyledcheney
In the history of this country, has there ever been a POTUS who worked so hard to make sure kids and seniors can’t eat?
1
4
Replying to @kyledcheney
Oregon received #SNAP last night
1
4
Replying to @kyledcheney
This is pure evilness
10
Replying to @kyledcheney
They are asking the Supreme Court to starve American citizens
Replying to @kyledcheney
Trying to stop SNAP benefits mid-month? This is moral bankruptcy on display.
1
30
Replying to @kyledcheney
Totally what Jesus would do … starve kids.
3
Replying to @kyledcheney
Trump’s wish is SCOTUS’s command. They just promptly stopped necessity of feeding hungry kids.
Oh, the Christians want to not feed kids again
2
4
24
Replying to @kyledcheney
He’s asking the Supreme Court to block food for millions, this is cruelty, not leadership.