When a Chinese filmmaker screens their work in New York while their family back home must bear the weight of fear, such blatant intimidation goes far beyond the realm of cultural censorship — it is a blatant act of transnational repression under long-arm control.
Who is pulling the strings behind all this?
Who is afraid of being seen?
And who, ultimately, is afraid of cinema?
On November 6, 2025, a brief notice suddenly appeared on the ticketing page of IndieChina’s official website (
indiechina.org/%e5%85%b3%e4%… )— “The film festival has been canceled.”A few hours later, curator Zhu Rikun released a statement on the festival’s website, writing:“Given the current situation, anyone involved in the festival — whether directors, forum participants, peripheral collaborators, volunteers, or even audiences — may face threats or harassment. The festival involves countless participants and audiences, and their safety is my top priority at this moment.”
So, what exactly is this “current situation”?
According to Zhu’s own account on Facebook the day before, since October 30, his family in China had begun to experience harassment. Soon after, the tenant of his Beijing studio was also summoned by the authorities. Within just two days, directors began sending “voluntary withdrawal” emails one after another — some even demanded that all publicity related to their films be taken down.
Filmmakers long based in the United States, Europe, and Africa, as well as forum guests and post-screening hosts, saw their relatives in China called in for questioning by the police.The redlines of censorship stretch across oceans and borders, reaching precisely those who still had the slightest connection to “China.”
Worse still, the screening venue in Manhattan, New York, received an anonymous letter of complaint.The sender, claiming to be “a group of Chinese students living in New York,” accused the festival of misrepresenting the realities of contemporary China and urged the venue to cancel the screenings.And as for who was truly behind all this — the answer, needless to say, is obvious.