Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments on whether it will overturn the Chevron doctrine鈥攁 40-year-old doctrine that's critical to a functioning federal government. Let me explain 馃У
The Chevron doctrine recognizes the Congress delegates authority to technical experts at federal agencies selected by Congress to implement federal laws, in line with Congress鈥檚 intent.
39
189
10
1,238
Overturning Chevron would enable individual judges to limit or overturn agency decisions, giving little to no deference to such decisions.
33
204
7
1,257
This is all part of the far-right's larger agenda to capture the courts to advance its ideological agenda by overturning decades-long precedent, sowing dysfunction and undermining Congressional intent and the federal government鈥檚 ability to implement federal law
21
297
9
1,524
For example, in 2022 when considering EPA clean air regulations, the conservative-majority Supreme Court applied the "major-questions" doctrine to get around the Chevron doctrine鈥攗ndermining the decisions of EPA experts and weakening critical environmental regulations.
24
233
5
1,287
Eliminating Chevron would prevent the government from fulfilling its most basic functions and allow big businesses and billionaires to further stack the deck in their favor鈥攁t the expense of working Americans and small businesses.
24
355
9
1,557
Justice Gorsuch and other Trump-appointee judges have been open about their intent to get rid of the Chevron doctrine. Overturning Chevron would ultimately impact the entire regulatory ecosystem.

Jan 18, 2024 路 9:59 PM UTC

28
271
9
1,354
To no one's surprise, the same far-right groups that fought to end Roe are all in for ending Chevron. It's all part of a larger push to sow dysfunction and undermine the federal government, no matter the costs.
78
385
4
1,816
Replying to @maziehirono
They have been stripping away power from our Federal Government for a while now. Bypassing Congress - regulations and run straight to the courts crammed with rightwingnimnuts in STOLEN judgeships Seats The basic duty of our Federal Government - protect usA. Clean water, air, etc
3
3
Replying to @maziehirono
It was his Mom that brought this to the court originally.
2
Replying to @maziehirono
This tweet is unavailable
1
Replying to @maziehirono
And that is why we plan to end it you nasty Communist
1
Replying to @maziehirono
I perpetually wonder what they think they're going to do if/when the planet is destroyed. Do they really think their robber-barron-level wealth, and that of their patrons and donors, will insulate them from consequences? They seem to.
1
Replying to @maziehirono
YES! GET RID OF IT! 馃嚭馃嚫
1
This tweet is unavailable
Replying to @maziehirono
Good bye green new steal
1
Replying to @maziehirono
You say that like it's a bad thing
1
Replying to @maziehirono
That鈥檚 the goal
Replying to @maziehirono
demand the expansion of the supreme Court to match the number of Circuit courts. As America has expanded so too must the legal system all the way to the top, add new rules enforced by the Judiciary committees of the Senate and Congress, If a Justice is corrupt Impeach them ASAP
Replying to @maziehirono
What a beautiful Supreme Court we have!!?馃ぎ
Replying to @maziehirono
Isn't there a gathering of policy-makers exclusively tasked with making regulations over every subject of federal concern? And, aren't you a member of it?
Replying to @maziehirono
How in the world anyone OTHER than a politician could think that this is a BAD thing amazes me. POWER TO THE PEOPLE! And out of corrupt government agencies and politicians like YOU.
3
Replying to @maziehirono
You're beyond a m鈼媟on.
2
Replying to @maziehirono
Chevron was wrongly decided and wrongly applied.
2
Replying to @maziehirono
Congress would be required to do its job. Congress hasn鈥檛 functioned properly in over 40 years. Chevron reversal will be the single greatest advance for liberty & self-governance in decades.
1