We need to have an frank talk about what it means — for journalists, for activists, for SWers, for anyone criminalized — that the owner of this platform will become a government official. And what that means for DMs, bookmarks, burner accts— anything we thought of as "private"🧵

Nov 8, 2024 · 5:55 PM UTC

The partnership is unprecedented, at least in the US. Many tech platforms are fairly deferential to subpoena requests, but what if you didn't even need that? What if you could easily supply a government with DMs between journalists and off-the-record sources?
What if you could monitor plans for political organizing? Deliver reports about those seeking reproductive care? Negotiations with clients? Payments? What if you could tie anonymous accounts to IP addresses/phone numbers? The potential for X to become a honeypot is staggering.
I don't know the logistics. Maybe there are magic TOS firewalls that would prevent it. But having the sole director – unrestrained by a board — also become an official member of the Trump administration is ... concerning. fortune.com/2024/11/06/elon-…
There's long been a moral and psychic trade off for me in continuing operating on here — but it's also offered the best way to connect with the largest number of people. But I'm increasingly, personally, thinking of this as a safety issue and suspect I'm headed for an Xit.
4
10
90
While Musk did famously demand his engineers design something he couldn't access with a gun to his head, it largely hasn't panned out There's encryption of certain DMs but ONLY if both users subscribe to blue AND have it turned on. And it excludes
Replying to @mikestabile
He bought it to prevent this. His directive to engineers was that they need to build it in such a way that if there was a gun to his head he could not grant access to DMs.
1
7
59
And it excludes group chats, media and links. Messages to someone you don't yet know are not encrypted. help.x.com/en/using-x/encryp…
1
2
45
Even worse, X still says that even the encrypted system is vulnerable to "man in the middle attacks" — where a "malicious insider" or even "X itself" could intercept the messages. And no one would know. This doesn't inspire confidence.
1
3
42
And that's to say nothing about things like location data, use of Twitter payments, contact between individuals, bookmarks, likes etc, all of which could be accessed on the command of a high-ranking member of the government, who also happens to own the company.
1
3
40
Again, I could be off! I'd be happen to be proven wrong. People like @mer__edith @samleecole @evan_greer @thedextriarchy know a lot more about digital privacy than me. But man am I uneasy using a platform owned by someone who may also have high government rank for activism.
1
4
45
FWIW I’m @mikestabile on Blusky which, in addition to not being run by a potential government informant and lacks many Nazzis, conveniently doesn’t have an app icon that looks like it was ripped from a pair of G*star Raw
6
1
54
Replying to @mikestabile
He bought it to prevent this. His directive to engineers was that they need to build it in such a way that if there was a gun to his head he could not grant access to DMs.
5
1
4
He said that, but they didn't build that. help.x.com/en/using-x/encryp…
1
21
Replying to @mikestabile
Elon Musk has one big dilemma he has to literally have no conflict of interest with his company. I'm starting to think Elon understand his place here and hasn't thought this thru at all. Elon you join the Fed you gotta appoint a new CEO for Tesla.
1
1
But conflicts of interest are the whole point of oligarchy.
2
24
Replying to @mikestabile
Been having those thoughts
1
5
Replying to @mikestabile
At least for now I think that the best plan is to self-censor. Don't put anything here that you wouldn't be comfortable having read by a government agent.
1
5
Replying to @mikestabile
Wait until you find out how many tech and social media sites gleefully worked with the feds and gave them everything they wanted during the Biden admin.
6
Replying to @mikestabile
Weren't that worried when the FBI had an official presence with the entire senior staff for years before Elon bought it. If it wasn't a problem then, why is it a problem now? Oh, because you don't have ideological control over it. Got it.
5
Replying to @mikestabile
You weren’t worried about it when they were doing it to your political opponents but all of a sudden it’s a problem? Go fuck yourself.
4
Replying to @mikestabile
How upset were you when the NSA repeatedly leaked Tucker Carlson's text messages to the media. Not very, I would guess.
3
Replying to @mikestabile
"What if the government keeps doing what they had been doing, but they're not on our side anymore?"
3
Replying to @mikestabile
X is privately owned. Twitter was publicly owned. Meaning when X was Twitter they already potentially had access to your privacy.
2
Replying to @mikestabile
Funny how gung ho the left was for censorship and still are. Take the L and keep those fucking tears coming. We love to see it.
2
Replying to @mikestabile
Don’t worry. We’re not going to look for the noodz you sent to woke 20 year olds.
1
Replying to @mikestabile
If journalists stop lying and just report FACTS instead of their political opinions, could be just the beginning of a positive changement
1
Replying to @mikestabile
When all of this is over, don't be afraid and don't be ashamed, just remember this: you were lied to.
1
Replying to @mikestabile
not everyone is as fickle as the FEMA manager who told people to avoid trump homes
1
Replying to @mikestabile
You vermin had all opposing views and anyone willing to voice them banned on all platforms for years. Fuck you
Replying to @mikestabile
If the owner of this platform was to disclose private info, that would make him a govt official. If he doesn't that will make him a corrupt govt official. Or there's a law that puts a wall between one's private business and govt data collection.
Replying to @mikestabile
RETARDED SYCOPHANT SLAVE ALERT
Replying to @mikestabile
News Flash: Google is a former CIA program. Rest assured that EVERYTHING you do on any connected computer or device is not private. It's never been private.
Did you send this message out for the Hunter and Jill involvement-don’t be hypocritical
Journalists just keep the info to put it in their next book.