The incel sees a beautiful woman and, being a narcissist, considers her only as an object of his lust - and then deems it unfair that she does not satiate it. This is how socialists see rich people (currently defined in the UK as earning more than £46k). They are objects of envy, and must immediately satiate your envy by handing over their wealth. In both cases, other people exist merely to service your emotions, which you are unable to regulate on your own.

Nov 7, 2025 · 7:35 PM UTC

77
115
18
1,228
Replying to @peterrhague
Oh God socialists as money incels is so funny
1
1
61
The socialists in the replies don't seem to think so lol
15
Replying to @peterrhague
> currently defined in the UK as earning more than £46k Sorry started laughing so hard could not get to the end
4
46
Please subscribe to me so I can become one of the UKs ultra-rich
1
32
Replying to @peterrhague
Mate. A teacher on £40k seeing a trust fund kid with a passive income of £200k per year is literally nothing like an incel.
6
9
In both cases you are considering another human being as a mere instrument to satisfy your wants
3
1
100
more replies
Replying to @peterrhague
Close to a quarter of the population is at/under the poverty line - would assume survival is a bigger driver than lust for these ~14M. I get you are engagement farming (why else compare these two), but this is a bit grim given the state of the country.
2
Most socialists aren’t on the bread line. They just claim to speak for those who are
2
15
more replies
Replying to @peterrhague
"rich people (currently defined in the UK as earning more than £46k)"?! Nobody defines that crap wage as rich.
1
1
You’ve not been keeping up with the budget news…
1
2
8
Replying to @peterrhague
Incel is a narcissist? What?
1
Yes. They believe that the only meaning of things and even people in the world is how they make them feel.
1
8
more replies
Replying to @peterrhague
I simply cannot conceive of the kind of mind that would earnestly write such nonsense. Then I see you have a blue tick and ask people to subscribe your writing and everything makes sense.
1
11
I think I hit a bullseye with this observation, given your reaction!
12
Replying to @peterrhague
We don't want their money dumb ass. We just want the gap between regular people and the most wealthy to be smaller. Because they are fucking up democracy.
2
5
You don't realise you were owned by Thatcher on this point decades ago piped.video/watch?v=pdR7WW3X…

Margaret Thatcher - "They'd rather have the poor poorer."

Margaret Thatcher's classic moment where she explains that everyone has benefitted from the economic reforms, even if the gap between rich and poor is wider....

youtube.com
3
8
more replies
Replying to @peterrhague
Bro "incel" is a longhouse word. Half of men are left behind because "liberation" meant hypergamy hyperdrive. Half the dudes who pay all the taxes and keep everything working are doing so for a totally ingrate society and are invisible to women. Yes, they actually do deserve sex.
4
2
2
GIF
Replying to @peterrhague
Curiously. I’ve often thought conservatism, within religion, partly resembles socialism of the sexual marketplace. Arguably, a working example of socialism as it is being applied to a zero some game.
Replying to @peterrhague
Good analysis
Replying to @peterrhague
😭
1
Replying to @peterrhague
It's gotta be a lot more complicated. Example: Hollywood is probably disproportionately socialist and leftist, while also being disproportionately rich, successful and envied.
Replying to @peterrhague
My pension fund gets me more than £46k net... I have to say that I do NOT live in the UK. Thank god!
2
Replying to @peterrhague
How is 46k a year rich?
Replying to @peterrhague
These are dangers that must be watched and harried away.
Replying to @peterrhague
Hey … interesting take. On this, I will consider.
Replying to @peterrhague
Ask Grok about the Seven Deadly Sins.
Load more