The AI-powered SDLC is a vibrant ecosystem of 80+ specialized tools. But is this the calm before the storm?? โ๏ธ
๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐๐ค๐:ย Working with large enterprises, I see the same pattern repeatedly. They don't want 15 point solutions that create a Frankenstein stack. They want:
๐น ๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ง๐๐:ย Who approved what AI tool? What data is it trained on?
๐นย ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ: One SSO, one audit log, one compliance review.
๐นย ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ: Not 47 separate invoices.
๐น ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ณ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฌ:ย New devs onboard to ONE platform, not a dozen tools.
๐น ๐๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง:ย Fewer contracts, fewer renewals, fewer points of failure.
The developer experience gap between "๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ-๐จ๐-๐๐ซ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฌ" and a "pretty good integrated platform" often matters less than the operational overhead.
๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐'๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐๐ 2-3 ๐๐ง๐-๐ญ๐จ-๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ง๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฌ with selective acquisitions filling the gaps. The specialized tools that survive will either:
โ Get acquired
โ Serve SMBs and startups who value flexibility over governance
โ Become features, not companies
But I could be wrong. Maybe the API economy and composability will actually work this time.
What do you think? ๐ค
๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฌ:ย Am I missing something? Does tool quality and specialization trump the pain of integration?
๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ:ย Are you seeing the same consolidation pressure, or is your organization happily managing a diverse AI tool stack?
Genuinely curious where I might be off-base here. ๐