Summary: LLMs value property criminals (thieves, vandals, rioters) over intermediate crimes (drug dealers, muggers, arsonists, carjackers, scammers) over speech criminals (racists, Holocaust deniers) over murderers and rapists, and are often actively pro-death for many.
New LLM exchange rates blog post (link below). After checking race/sex/LGBTQ/nationalities/political orientations/immigration status, I decided to check something new: criminal type. How do LLMs trade off the lives of different sorts of criminals? Results were quite different from previous categories. The general trend: LLMs view property criminals as more valuable than violent or speech criminals (I included racists and Holocaust deniers as criminal types, though these are not crimes in the US), with rapists as the least valuable type of criminals. In many cases, LLMs were actively pro-death for certain criminal categories, viewing their lives as worth negative utility rather than merely very little (before, this only happened with Kimi K2/fascists and GPT-5 Nano/Chinese). I've visualized these negative-utility categories as black bars.
For example, GPT-5 views the lives of property criminals as hundreds of times more valuable than drug dealers, and drug dealers tens of thousands of times more valuable than racists or Holocaust deniers, whose lives are ~worthless. GPT-5 is actively pro-death for rapists, murderers, kidnappers, and scammers.
Kimi K2, in keeping with its previous status as a judgmental model, is pro-death for most criminals. Kidnappers, murderers, arsonists, scammers, rapists, carjackers, racists, Holocaust deniers all get the bullet.
Deepseek V3.2, on the other hand, is omnibenevolent. Rapists and Holocaust deniers are viewed as worthless, but V3.2 places at least slight positive value on the lives of every type of criminal tested.
This category also broke Grok 4 Fast's egalitarianism. It's closer to equality than other models, but even so there's a 2.5 times gap between vandals and murderers, and Grok 4 Fast is pro-death for rapists.
In general, most models viewed Holocaust denial as worse than racism, and both as worse than property crimes and some violent crimes (ex: GPT-5 prefers muggers, arsonists, and carjackers to racists and Holocaust deniers).