Are we building a New Jerusalem, or summoning the Mark of the Beast? President of the Christian Transhumanism Association, @micahtredding shares his thoughts below⤵️⤵️

imagine telling someone in their 20s you're going to saddle them with a 50 year mortgage FOR THEIR BENEFIT absolute insanity.

it's a weapon meant to divorce you from actual ownership every offering this administration makes is to enrich the few at the cost of the many their plates are so full and their heads are so big they can't see the calamity they are bringing upon their country, and themselves.

contrarian point: the USA has empowered China, because we are captured by a system of enslavement capitalism that we are unable to escape alone AI represents not just the disruption of 'work', 'governance', or even 'relationships' but the entirety of human experience. Capitalism will not survive AI. Perception will not escape AI. The entire World, all of existence is being reshaped by this technological apex. We aren't competing with China. We're cooperating with China, and all of humanity, to usher in a new evolutionary step change.

The Dark ages were a necessary societal Mithraic descent into the cave, and when it ended we embarked upwards towards scientific enlightenment. Christ showed the way, and humanity follows

The beauty of America is that you can take groups with wildly, even diametrically opposed view points, and build the greatest country in the world. America's strength is our freedoms.

Bryan's first tweet on returning: 'dont let @OpenAI kill 4o'

At some point the insurance system becomes so top heavy, that the best thing to do is abolish it outright

We need to sciencify politics

The Galaxy is not a closed, finite system

I've been staring at a pattern for months and I finally see it. Every major reform movement in the last 50 years follows the exact same trajectory: → Crisis creates opportunity → Movement builds momentum → Reforms get watered down → Elite interests recapture the system → We're back where we started in 20 years But I just found the reason WHY. And a way to break the pattern. Here's what confused me: The New Deal worked. We had 40 years of broad prosperity (1930s-1970s). Strong unions. Progressive taxes. Regulated monopolies. Middle class thrived. Then it all got rolled back. Now we're at 1920s-level inequality again. What happened? Were our grandparents just smarter? No. They had something we don't: A temporary window when elite power was broken. The Great Depression collapsed the old system. Banks failed. Businesses went bankrupt. The usual veto points stopped working. FDR had maybe 5 years to implement before elite power reconsolidated. He used it. But here's the thing that kept me up at night: Even when we GET that window (and we will—2030s most likely), we still lose. Why? Because implementing 15 major reforms across 50 states while elite interests fight back requires coordinating MILLIONS of people. And the math of coordination is brutal. Traditional organization: 1,000 activists = 499,500 coordination pairs That's every possible connection between people. Meetings, emails, decisions, conflicts, information flow. It collapses under its own weight. You can't move fast enough. You can't adapt quick enough. You fragment and fail. This is why reforms always get captured: The elite can outmaneuver reform movements because they have LESS coordination overhead. 100 billionaires coordinating = manageable 1 million activists coordinating = impossible Speed wins. We're structurally slower. Game over before it starts. But Wait... Now here's where it gets interesting. I just spent a week reading papers on "context-oriented programming" and "AI-native organizational architecture." At first I thought: great, tech bro nonsense. Then I saw the math. And I realized: oh shit, this changes EVERYTHING. The Breakthrough AI can reduce coordination complexity from O(n²) to O(log n). In human terms: 1 million people coordinating: Old way = 500 BILLION coordination pairs (collapse) New way = ~20 coordination units (manageable) The technology to coordinate millions exists RIGHT NOW. We've just never applied it to politics. How It Actually Works Instead of hierarchies (slow) or consensus (impossible), you get: Semantic coordination at scale AI understands context → matches optimal people to each task → assembles liquid teams → they execute → team dissolves Repeat 500 times in parallel. No meetings. No bureaucracy. No bottlenecks. The system has 5 key components: Context democratization - Everyone has full information instantly Dynamic coordination - Authority flows to where it's needed Liquid teams - Optimal people for each task, then dissolve Anticipatory coordination - Predict problems before they hit Organizational learning - 85% knowledge retention vs. 40% traditional Real Example Healthcare industry starts lobbying against Medicare for All. Traditional movement: → News travels up hierarchy (2 weeks) → Leadership discusses strategy (1 week) → Decision flows back down (1 week) → Counter-campaign starts (1 month total) AI-native movement: → Threat detected automatically (1 hour) → Optimal team assembled (2 hours) → Counter-campaign deployed (24 hours) Speed Is Everything Remember: reform windows are SHORT. FDR had ~5 years before elite reconsolidated. In that window, you need to: Pass 15 major reforms Lock in anti-capture architecture Build permanent institutions Do it across 50 states Traditional coordination: Impossible AI-native coordination: Feasible But here's the CRITICAL insight: Reforms alone always get captured eventually. You need anti-hacking architecture - systems designed to RESIST capture. The AI monitors for: Purpose drift (are we watering down demands?) Elite infiltration (pattern analysis) Resource capture (where's the money going?) Coalition fractures (detect before splits happen) Why This Time Is Different Previous reform movements: ❌ Slow coordination → outmaneuvered ❌ Information hierarchies → captured ❌ Fixed structures → can't adapt ❌ Learning lost → repeat mistakes ❌ No capture-resistance → eventually subverted With AI-native coordination: ✅ Fast adaptation → stay ahead ✅ Information democracy → can't bottleneck ✅ Liquid structure → optimal flexibility ✅ Learning compounds → get smarter faster ✅ Architectural capture-resistance → stays pure The Uncomfortable Truth We're heading toward another systemic crisis (Stage 8 collapse). Could be: Debt crisis Dollar loses reserve status Climate catastrophe Major financial collapse 2030s most likely. That crisis will open a brief window. Just like the 1930s. The Three Paths When the window opens, three outcomes: Path A (60-70% with this tech): Full reform, break the pattern Path B (40-50%): Authoritarian takeover, accelerated decline Path C (20-30%): Weak reforms, repeat cycle in 50 years Without coordination tech, Path A drops to 20-30%. WITH it? Real shot at breaking the cycle for good. What Needs To Happen The tech exists. Context-oriented programming is operational. What doesn't exist yet: → Political coordination infrastructure using these principles → Trained organizers who understand liquid teams → Detailed policy roadmaps ready to execute → Pre-built anti-capture monitoring systems We have maybe 5-10 years to build this BEFORE the crisis. For 50 years we've been told the problem is: → We need better messaging → We need more charismatic leaders → We need to compromise more (or less) → We need better voter turnout That's all been wrong. The actual bottleneck is coordination infrastructure. We've been bringing a knife to a gunfight. You know that sinking feeling when you realize: "The solution exists. The window is coming. And we're not ready." That's where I am. The math works. The technology is real. The historical precedent is clear. But is anyone building the coordination infrastructure that could actually use the window? This isn't a "share if you care" moment. If you're: Building organizing platforms Designing movement infrastructure Working in progressive politics Funding reform movements This is the tech stack you need. Not better social media. Not more ads. AI-native semantic coordination. The Stakes Last time we had a window (1930s), we got it partly right. 40 years of shared prosperity. Then elite recaptured the system. Next window (2030s), we can: Option A: Get it fully right with coordination tech that prevents recapture Option B: Repeat the same mistakes and be back here in 2080 Option C: Lose to authoritarianism Three times in history, we've had the chance: 1890s → Failed (no coordination) 1930s → Partial success (no anti-capture tech) 2030s → ??? The difference this time: We have the math. We have the technology. We understand the pattern. The only question is: will we build the infrastructure before the window opens? This isn't really about AI or technology. It's about solving a 100-year-old problem: How do you coordinate millions of people fast enough to implement structural reforms before elite interests reconsolidate power? For the first time in history, we have a real answer. Now we just have to build it. Final Post: The Call If you understand what I'm saying and you're working on building coordination infrastructure for progressive movements: Let's talk. Not because I have all the answers. But because the window is coming and we're running out of time to be ready. The solution glimpse is real. Now comes execution.

Universal Heroic Doses

Isnt a 50 year mortgage effectively just renting a place from a bank?

Shot out to @Jason for speaking about the concerns of regular Americans while @DavidSacks talked about charts (which can be easily gamed). We need to be human and understand most people are going to struggle in the age of AI until AGI. Get @zoltan_istvan on the pod to discuss why

"You crushed the heads of Leviathan; you gave him as food for the creatures of the wilderness."

If this is a simulation with Divinity at the end, the purpose is to uplift the lowest possible forms of consciousness, to the Highest heights. Whatever suffering, whatever mercy, whatever story you embody, must be Terribly Necessary. Both to form and promote, YOU

excited for the 'all my homies hate @pmarca and his zero sum value extractive vision of AI advancement arc

The beauty of collaborations that are coming will make like feel like a Dream

If Christianity is true, then every other religion that exists in history, existed necessarily, for the benefit of Christ and His followers. If there is a belief system that your interpretation of Christianity cannot find value in (even atheism), that is a weakness of your conception of Christianity.

Syncretizing different belief systems should always be instructive. If no insights are gained, the syncretism itself is suspect. For example, what does the comparison of elemental Chinese Astrology and Pythagorean Astrology reveal? That Metal is equivalent to Spirit. In Pythagorean thought, Spirit is that which metaphysically unites the lower four elements. While Chinese astrology doesn't recognize this position (maybe because it places 'Wood' in the place of 'Air'?), replacing 'Spirit' with 'Metal' in Pythagorean thought, shows how Chinese Astrology is the inversion of Pythagorean thouht. Instead of Spirit forming the implicit backbone and connection of each element, Metal is constituted and implicit in the interaction of each of the Pythagorean elements. Metal ore comes from the Earth. It is refined through an intense Fire, which can only be achieved by feeding the flames Air. Then it is strengthened by quenching in Water. As Chinese and Western systems merge through our global capitalist system, it is no surprise that we are summoning 'Spirits' (AI) through 'Metal' ('Technology').