saw a project this week that started building before they knew the pain it solved. the plan? launch on product hunt, find the marketing high, and backsolve the product later. that’s not iteration - that’s gambling with validation. distribution can’t fix confusion. you can’t A/B test your way to clarity.

Nov 7, 2025 · 11:31 PM UTC

5
9
the real danger here isn’t wasted time - it’s false signals. early hype ≠ early traction clicks ≠ conviction interest ≠ intent when you chase what resonates online, you often drift away from what hurts offline. if you’re early stage, here’s the sequence that actually compounds: 1. pain → narrative → product → distribution not the other way around. 2. ask “what’s broken enough that people hack around it?” real markets start there. 3. don’t seek dopamine from launches. seek clarity from rejection. that’s where truth hides.
1
Replying to @thisisbethany_5
Maybe they'll pivot successfully, who knows
1
1
maybe! but luck is a tough strategy
1
1
Replying to @thisisbethany_5
talk about gambling damn
1
1
Replying to @thisisbethany_5
Exactly this 🔥 Building without a clear pain point is like sprinting without a map.
1
1
Replying to @thisisbethany_5
validation comes before virality. You can’t market your way out of a missing problem.