Most people are like children when it comes to taking the most banal point and going with it. Transition of state is important factor here.
NK:
1. Soviet satellite in unique geopolitical wedge of Communist East Asia
2. Kleptocratic elites with dynastic cult of personality
SK:
1. US satellite kleptocracy
2. Enlightened dictatorship
3. Authoritarian oligarchy
4. GAE satellite liberal end-run
Then consider when those lights came up mostly. For SK it’s 2 and 3. Nothing to do with just pure capital. Developmental state earned its miracles through central control of capital, bone crushing hard work, and ignoring most of the economic dogma of the time.
Korea and Germany are two examples of random lines being drawn and one side going all government (full communism) and the other side going only half government (socialist, aka half communism and half capitalism)
Sep 28, 2024 · 4:54 PM UTC
In fact, the story of Korean peninsular (and other East Asian tiger stories) is one about competent leadership. Both NK and SK had confucian background, culture comfortable with mass mobilization and hierarchy. Why SK pulled ahead is competent leadership that placed good of the nation ahead of personal good (unlike NK)
