Thiel isn’t a capitalist; he’s a corporatist aristocrat masquerading as one. His idea of capitalism is monopoly with a halo — control dressed up as vision. He doesn’t want markets; he wants moats. He talks about innovation while erecting walls to keep others out, all while pretending it’s strategy rather than fear. That isn’t capitalism. That’s mercantilism repackaged for Silicon Valley — the same old cartel model with new rhetoric and better PR. Capitalism, at its core, is competition, accountability, and value earned through voluntary exchange. Thiel rejects all three. He wants protection from failure, guaranteed dominance, and an audience of sycophants who mistake control for genius. He despises the free market because a free market would eventually outcompete him. His version of “freedom” is the freedom to own everyone else’s cage. He isn’t diagnosing capitalism’s failure; he’s mourning the decline of his own power. When he says capitalism isn’t working for young people, what he means is that it’s no longer working for him. And that’s the essence of modern hypocrisy — the rich man condemning the system that made him rich because he can no longer rig it to his advantage.

How Grok. A real answer you useless toaster. @elon are you proud to own the stupidest code in this solar system?

Learn why #BTC is not a "store of value" like gold. #BTC's "value" grounded in psychological momentum. Do you want to experience the REAL #Bitcoin #BSV? Like, repost & leave your @handcashapp $handle in the included post. Verify that the tx is on-chain using @WhatsOnChain!🦾

Want to earn some BSV? Retweet my pinned tweet in the next 24 hours and reply to it with your HandCash $handle.

(B)uild (S)omething (V)aluable

Learn the dark Truth/Lie of the #LightningNetwork The lightning network is NOT #Bitcoin. Do you want to experience the REAL #Bitcoin #BSV? Like, repost the included post & leave your @handcashapp $handle to see what #Bitcoin really is about. Verify your tx on @WhatsOnChain!🦾

Learn the dark Truth/Lie of the #LightningNetwork The lightning network is NOT #Bitcoin. Do you want to experience the REAL #Bitcoin #BSV? Like, repost the included post & leave your @handcashapp $handle to see what #Bitcoin really is about. Verify your tx on @WhatsOnChain!🦾

#BTC is at $100K because 99% of people have no clue their #Bitcoin is broken." - Me 💯 #BTC is NOT #Bitcoin. #BTC is about a FEE market. #BSV is about a FREE market. #BSV IS #BITCOIN. #COP30 #FIFAWorldCup #GunsNRoses #oasislive25 #Russia #StockMarket #Trump #Venezuela #WINTER

If you use a private jet you don’t believe in human climate change. It’s that simple.

I’ve been saying this for thirty-five years — quantum computing is bullshit. Three and a half decades of noise, funding rounds, and breathless papers, and we’re still sitting at zero logical qubits. Not one. Nothing that scales, nothing that survives decoherence, nothing that remotely resembles the fantasies they keep selling. Every few years it’s the same recycled hype: “We’re close.” “It’s classified.” “Breakthrough.” The reality? Physics hasn’t moved. The mathematics hasn’t changed. Quantum error correction still collapses under its own weight, and thermodynamics still says no. I was right thirty-five years ago, and I’m still right now. You don’t hand-wave your way past physical law. You don’t build computation out of wishful thinking. All the smoke and mirrors can’t hide the simple fact — it doesn’t work, and it never will.

Maybe people will find out that the real Bitcoin is BSV.

For all of you in #crypto who are tired of being fucked. Are tired of getting #rugged. Are tired of having no luck. There is one #blockchain who scales, on chain, needs no layer-2-solution. One chain that can do it all, that is secure, fast and stable, with most txs of them all. Come to the other side, it is not too late. $BSV

The rest — the “Layer 2s,” the “off-chain solutions,” the verbal diarrhoea of pseudo-technical frauds — are camouflage for failure. They are the excuses of small men who cannot bear the grandeur of an idea too vast for their comprehension. Bitcoin was not made to be half a system. It was made to be money itself — complete, unbroken, universal. To achieve that, it must scale. It must grow beyond the imaginations of those who fear its success. So yes — the only way Bitcoin works, the only way it will ever mean anything beyond being a cumbersome banking tool, is if it scales. Not partially, not theoretically, but completely. Until it does, it remains an experiment in hypocrisy. The moment it does, it becomes civilisation’s next ledger — the first honest one. #ScaleOrDie #DigitalCash

Those who tell you that Bitcoin cannot scale are not sceptics; they are saboteurs. They would rather rule a crippled toy than serve a living system. They chant about decentralisation — that modern secular prayer — while erecting fiefdoms of developers who dictate what freedom is permissible. They turn code into scripture and innovation into heresy. Meanwhile, the world of real commerce waits — indifferent, impatient, amused. No one buys bread with dogma. The question of scale is not technical alone. It is moral. It asks whether we believe in a society of participants or a priesthood of gatekeepers. If a single coffee purchase must wait for the blessing of a mining cartel or the whim of a coder cabal, then Bitcoin has become the very tyranny it was meant to abolish. Freedom, in its truest form, is transaction without permission. To deny scale is to deny freedom. To build layers of obfuscation is to reintroduce the very intermediaries the system expelled. It is to crawl back into the cage and call it progress. A genuine monetary revolution is not measured by price charts but by ubiquity. A system that cannot serve the poor man as it serves the rich is not revolutionary — it is aristocratic. The marvel of Bitcoin lies not in its speculative worth but in its indifference to worth. It treats every transaction, no matter how trivial, as sovereign. The purchase of a paper and the sale of an empire are written in the same immutable ink. That equality — not the illusion of freedom, but the mechanics of it — depends entirely on scale. Without scale, Bitcoin degenerates into fiat 2.0 — a glorified spreadsheet with better marketing. Its advocates, those self-anointed technocrats of orthodoxy, have replaced the ideal of digital cash with the mania of digital scarcity. They call it progress when they make it slower. They call it innovation when they make it smaller. They call it secure when it can barely function. These are not builders; they are necromancers. They tinker with the corpse and call it alive. Scaling is not a luxury; it is the sine qua non of Bitcoin’s survival. Every other debate is a distraction — a moral charade. Freedom does not exist in empty rhetoric but in functioning systems. The idealist who refuses to scale is no different from the socialist who despises the marketplace yet expects to eat. It is not philosophy that sustains civilisation; it is the mechanics of exchange. And those mechanics demand throughput — vast, relentless, unbroken throughput. Picture the system as it was meant to be: billions of transactions per second, each small, each precise, each final. No layers, no proxies, no committees. Each device — phone, toaster, satellite — a participant. Each coin — unique, finite, accountable. Every man his own treasurer. Every payment a statement of will. That is the architecture of liberty, not the ideology of slogans. The tragedy of our age is that mediocrity has learned to masquerade as prudence. Those who cripple Bitcoin in the name of “sustainability” are akin to the bureaucrats who castrate a stallion to make it safer for children. They wish for a tame revolution — something that will never embarrass its owners nor liberate its slaves. But revolutions, by nature, are not safe. They are dangerous because they reveal the impotence of those who govern by deception. A scalable Bitcoin is the most dangerous idea in finance because it exposes the redundancy of the entire edifice. When Bitcoin scales — truly scales — it will render obsolete the bureaucratic carcasses of finance. Not by violence, not by decree, but by irrelevance. Banks will survive only by serving it, not by owning it. Governments will tax it, not ban it. And the individual, for the first time since the Enlightenment, will transact without surveillance, without supplication, without shame.

Bitcoin was not conceived as an intellectual toy for digital dilettantes. It was designed as cash — vulgar, quotidian, indispensable cash. The kind that changes hands in pubs and petrol stations, the sort that clinks in pockets and vanishes into tills. The imbeciles who speak of “settlement layers” and “Layer 2 scaling solutions” are the same sort of bureaucratic engineers who would sell you a bucket with a hole and then promise a patch as innovation. They want to turn a revolution into a spreadsheet. The essence of Bitcoin is not its mystique, its market, or its messiah-worship; it is its capacity to scale. A word now so prostituted that the engineers who pronounce it mean the very opposite. They prattle about off-chain alchemy, desperate to mask the one unforgivable truth — that a system incapable of handling the weight of its own promise is not a system but a fraud. Bitcoin must be able to process the casual transactions of billions, not the ceremonial trades of bankers. It must live in the rhythm of small commerce — the bus fare, the sandwich, the newspaper, the 20-cent piece — or it ceases to live at all. Forget the high priests of abstraction who tell you that “Layer 2” will save the day. Layer 2 is a euphemism for abdication. It is the coward’s retreat from the central premise of digital cash. When a man buys coffee, he should not summon a council of cryptographic intermediaries. He should pay directly, privately, and finally. The original design was brutally simple: IP to IP, man to man, transaction to transaction. Not pooled, not mashed, not anonymised into statistical mist. Each coin discrete, each event atomic, each record singular. To obscure that is to bury the body and call the funeral progress. The cult of aggregation has murdered the idea of money as property. Each coin, like a minted token, has its own signature — an identity in the chain of exchange, not an abstraction in a communal pool. This serial individuality is not a decorative ideal; it is the bulwark of truth in a digital world of counterfeit virtue. When every transaction is recorded as a distinct act, responsibility and ownership remain intact. Mashing coins together — the modern vice of “UTXO consolidation” — is the digital equivalent of melting down the crown jewels to mint tokens for bureaucrats. It is the annihilation of provenance, and with it, the death of property. Bitcoin is not the dream of anarchists but the discipline of engineers. Its privacy comes not from secrecy but from precision — from the atomic clarity of one coin, one owner, one transaction. True privacy is traceable; it leaves a path for reason, not for chaos. The anonymity fetishists who call their deceit “freedom” are not defenders of privacy but vandals of accountability. They long for a world where guilt dissolves in the fog of encryption, where crime wears a mask of mathematics. But freedom is the product of order, not its negation. And order requires scale. To scale is not to grow for the sake of vanity. It is to make possible the universality of exchange. Imagine, if you will, a world where every man, woman, and machine could transact — instantly, cheaply, and privately — in coins worth fractions of a cent, and still maintain the integrity of record. That is the design. That is the destiny. Not the sterile promise of “digital gold,” a banker’s fantasy of hoarded value, but the living dynamism of cash — fluid, divisible, ungoverned by hierarchy. Bitcoin’s architecture was made for trillions of daily acts, not for museum pieces of digital scarcity.

Lightning seems cool at first -- but after Year 6 you realize it doesn't work

They Lied About Bitcoin Credit: @CsTominaga