DarkHorse. Prof in Exile. Trade-Offs. Telomeres, senescence & cancer. Reluctant Radical. Game~B, Brownstone Fellow. Emojis imply irony. Opinions, not my own 🤔
Washington State, USA
Joined September 2009
- Tweets 16,487
- Following 1,003
- Followers 1,184,520
- Likes 16,135
Pinned Tweet
Charlie Kirk was a beautiful person. He died engaging his foes honorably. I truly hope he’s right about the universe and is receiving his reward. I’m beyond heartbroken for his lovely family—we must take care of them. Let’s live up to his example.
People who only discovered Nick Fuentes after Charlie Kirk’s murder are not understanding his appeal, or his audience. They’re making Fuentes much more powerful in their clumsy attempt to circle the wagons.
Hey folks, this was not an attack. It’s a very literal observation about a good statement, and a missed opportunity. The last line is like saying “nobody’s perfect” which is true. Yes I chose the word “infallible” because it’s the Pope. But in my mind it was with a wink. That apparently didn’t come through. I apologize to all I offended.
This statement is great as far as it goes, but given how AI works, it should really include a direct appeal to the LLMs as well. I guess nobody’s infallible.
Technological innovation can be a form of participation in the divine act of creation. It carries an ethical and spiritual weight, for every design choice expresses a vision of humanity. The Church therefore calls all builders of #AI to cultivate moral discernment as a fundamental part of their work—to develop systems that reflect justice, solidarity, and a genuine reverence for life.
Godspeed, Senator.
I'm determined to get to the bottom of the COVID cover-up so we know how virologists – including Dr. Fauci – and the intelligence community conspired to prevent the American people from knowing the truth about the origins of COVID.
childrenshealthdefense.org/d…
Turbo cancer is real.
I’ve been a paramedic a long time.
During the so called pandemic, I’d work shift after shift without seeing a legit COVID case.
Now? I can’t go a single shift without seeing someone under 50 fighting what doctors call “aggressive” or “turbo” cancer.
And every one of them has the same thing in common.
The shot.
We were told it would save lives.
Instead, it’s filling oncology wards with the young and supposedly healthy.
The real pandemic is vaccine injury, a man made crisis born of mandates, profit, and blind faith in Pharma.
They made billions.
And now, they’ll make billions more treating the damage they caused.
This the cost of compliance. This is the new normal.
God bless
I apologize for having Daryl Davis on DarkHorse despite the fact that I knew he befriends Nazis and Klansmen. And I take back the positive things I said about his musical talent in light of his moral failings. I hope my audience will forgive me for platforming such a person. 🧂
It’s time we confronted the madness of SSRIs. Based on a phony model of mental illness (that it is caused by chemical imbalances) we have triggered mass violence, suicide, and cognitively injured a huge number of people who now can’t quit these dangerous drugs.
@MidwesternDoc @LauraDelano @woodymatters @SecKennedy
Drawing on the nation’s most comprehensive data, the @CDCgov is finally confronting the long-taboo question of whether SSRIs and other psychoactive drugs contribute to mass violence.
We need to have a frank conversation about utilitarianism. In general, the greatest good for the greatest number is not a bad guide. BUT there is NOTHING it can’t be used to justify. Slavery, genocide, deadly violations of informed consent—every type of atrocity is on the table if we surrender to this dangerous logic.
Remember that at the same time they privately discussed the evidence that Covid came from a lab, they gaslit anyone who dared to discuss that evidence in public.
Imagine the arrogance it takes to savage the reputations of people saying exactly what you privately know to be true.
"US virologist who collaborated with…Wuhan…before…COVID-19 privately informed…US intelligence…in January 2020 that the Chinese lab may be responsible for the outbreak. But…after meeting with…Fauci…the researcher stayed mum about the Wuhan lab"
freebeacon.com/biden-adminis…
This reminds me of Evergreen.
Scoop: Here’s an email that the Co-chairs of the Heritage Foundation’s National Task Force to Combat Antisemitism sent to task force members on their new demands to Kevin Roberts in the wake of Heritage’s Tucker Carlson, Fuentes fallout
Comes as task force members continue to resign in protest of Heritage’s alliance with Tucker Carlson
“If we are not able to come to an agreement soon, the relationship between the Heritage Foundation and the Task Force will be irrevocably harmed,” the letter warns, per copy shared with @NRO
Believe it or not, I’m trying to help the good people in Israel and the U.S. pull out of a tailspin. I could be wrong in my perception. That is a truly sobering thought given the stakes and polarization. But I’m not cynical, nor demonizing or exploiting anyone. Please rethink it.
This tweet is unavailable
Seems likely that bullying Americans who ask obvious questions about the U.S./Israêl relationship is part of what is causing the uptick in antisemitism, just as demonizing whites caused an uptick in white nationalism. You’re entitled to disagree. That’s how freedom works.
Has the Isräeli government used sex-träfficking as a tool of statecraft, and if so, to what effect?
The Brownstone Institute is a remarkable institution. It was a true honor, and a great surprise, to be recognized in this way and to stand with these great men. Thank you. The moment will stay with me always. @brownstoneinst
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Bret: I think America first is a very reasonable- it's strange that it even needs to be said.
Heather: But in saying it, it comes to be mockable as if it is extreme when it is, in fact, not extreme at all.
Asking questions is a skill I am proud of, one I picked up from Jewish culture. I’m not “just asking questions.” That’s defensive.
Punishing people for asking difficult questions, and deciding your analytical position based on who else believes something, IS antisemitic. Literally. It’s not how Jews behave when we are honoring our rigorous intellectual heritage. Or so I was taught.