The term 'hidebound' comes to mind.
Also 'ossified'.
Not all of them, but some.
The entire battlespace is changing every day. And we have to be nimble enough to make needed adjustment if we are to retain our lofty perch.
Further, China is cranking out 1000 missile engines a day.
Even if we are the top-of-the-line. They can bury our systems with enough quantity. And that appears to be what they are going for in missiles.
Further, the quantity of drones their software can handle is impressive. The enormous displays they can field tells of a fine degree of control of massive numbers of units.
The War in Ukraine is a testing ground for the latest battle-drone software.
Super Rapid fire deck-guns should be able to take care of a super-swarm of mini-drones, especially if they are firing shotgun shells. And all drones should have an alternate method of sending and receiving information other than radio waves, because that will be the first thing that is jammed.
And AI is warming up in the bullpen.
My point is that our command staff has to be as flexible as our ability to develop what we need in short order, and have it produced at speed.
So, we might need to look at ways to produce our wonder weapons at greater quantities and in a shorter time-frame.
Which means the military might need to get into the armaments production business, because there's no way a business based on the capitalist system can have that amount of production potential sitting idle. So some of the people attached to the military might have to be skilled at mass production as well. We are not always at war. But we have to be ready when one is looming or we are.