You can keep your 'modern Britain' This one worked just fine

They grow up so fast…

This drone tech Godzilla is incredible!

‘Tis the season

Me and my wife at school conferences when the teacher mentions her "partner"

"So, this stuff really works?" "It certainly does." "Yeah, well, lots of luck!" *Smack!*

Jeremy has made an video!

Every. word. of. this… “The awful truth about the BBC is now too monstrous to hide. Britain is a decaying, dysfunctional society, and the BBC is complicit in our decline. Our national broadcaster is not merely dishonest, biased and prone to cover-ups, as a Telegraph investigation reveals; it has also been wrong about almost everything that matters. Fuelled by billions of pounds extracted via the licence fee, the BBC has spent forty years shrinking the Overton window, waging war against centre-Right dissidents, bullying politicians into following destructive orthodoxies and promoting an anti-Western, anti-capitalist, anti-conservative worldview. Its output, riddled with group-think, lapped up by our decrepit establishment, reeks of oikophobia, economic illiteracy, soft socialism, suicidal empathy and luxury beliefs. Seduced by critical theory, the BBC backs the “anywheres” against the “somewheres”, supports global institutions, from the EU to UNRWA, and barely conceals its disgust at those who prefer power to be located at the national level.” telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11…

🚨NEW: Dominic Cummings: "Our regime imports terrorists, gives them passports, calls them ‘British’, then says ‘oh he turned out to be a violent terrorist but he’s British so this has nothing to do with immigration, diversity is our strength, you’re racist if you disagree’."

White and Black women celebrate Mamdani Win — “Sharia law starts now, absof*ckingutely” They have no idea what they’re asking for. Not a damn clue.

The BBC stands accused of the most serious breach of trust in its history. An internal whistleblower has revealed that Panorama – the Corporation's flagship investigative programme – deliberately doctored a Donald Trump speech to make it appear he was urging on the Capitol riot. In reality, Trump had told his supporters to march "peacefully and patriotically" to make their voices heard. The BBC cut that line, spliced in phrases from another part of the speech, and broadcast the fake version a week before the 2024 US election. The BBC didn't "misreport" Trump. It doctored him. It took an hour-long address, sliced it into pieces, and stitched together a line that never existed – turning a call for peace into a call for violence. It then ran the footage under dark music, cut to scenes of rioters, and presented the lie as fact to millions of viewers. This wasn't clumsy editing. It was fabrication. It was intent. The Corporation made a man say words he never uttered, to feed a story it had already decided was true. That is not journalism. That is propaganda. The revelation comes from an internal BBC adviser, Michael Prescott, who served on the Corporation's own standards committee. When he raised alarm at the distortion, senior executives dismissed his concerns. The Director-General looked away. The chairman said nothing. The culture that once prized truth above all now protects deceit in its own name. And it fits a pattern. The same BBC that forged Trump's words has whitewashed Hamas's war crimes. It commissioned a Gaza documentary narrated by the son of a Hamas minister, paid him, and told the public he was part of the "Hamas-run government" – as though that were somehow different from Hamas itself. The same delusion runs through their coverage: terrorists are "militants," victims are "combatants," and Israel's self-defence is "aggression." Like all Britain's great institutions, the BBC has been captured by a Leftist-Islamist ideology that prizes grievance over truth and allegiance over honesty. It speaks the language of compassion while serving the cause of those who despise the civilisation that funds it. From Whitehall to the classroom, from the Met to the newsroom, the infection is the same – a new clerisy that believes moral virtue gives it the right to deceive. The disease is always the same: ideology before evidence. The BBC now begins every story with a sermon. In America it was "Trump the menace." In Israel it is "the occupier." In Britain it is "the oppressed versus the privileged." The facts are trimmed to fit the creed. When reality resists, it is edited out of existence. They call this "narrative integrity." In plain English, it means lying for the greater good. It's why the BBC can run a campaign ad claiming that "the more you try to drown out reality, the harder we'll work to establish the facts" – even as it drowns them itself. It's why it lectures others about deepfakes while producing its own. This is not accidental bias. It is the logic of a captured institution that sees its mission as moral correction. The BBC no longer trusts the public to think; it instructs them what to think. It decides which truths are dangerous, which lies are useful, and which stories must be rewritten for the cause. And here is the irony. The broadcaster that once gave Britain its common voice has become the greatest source of distortion in the land. It claims to defend democracy, yet it meddles in elections abroad. It claims to stand for impartiality, yet it silences dissent at home. It claims to fight hate, yet excuses those who preach it. The BBC's real product today isn't news. It's obedience. When a state broadcaster edits words to invent guilt, it stops being a mirror and becomes a weapon. The BBC's greatest lie isn't what it said about Trump or Israel. It's what it says about itself: that it can be trusted. "The same BBC that forged Trump's words has whitewashed Hamas's war crimes."

i gasped when i saw this

Donald Trump with Muhammad Ali and Rosa Parks—before Trump became “racist.”

I was on the Huntingdon train. I only know of one attacker, he got on the train from Peterborough. He was black mid 20’s. We ran from the back of the train to the end as everyone was screaming to run, explaining there was somebody stabbing everyone and everything. 1/

Sure it is.

They said no.

The look on the right is becoming associated with high class prostitution in America because of the “insta baddie” esthetic. Having that look on Instagram will make anyone assume that person gets solicitations and “vacations.” Any posted pictures abroad and it’s basically a confirmation. The beauty trends are moving back to “natural” and “90s” and Americans are setting this. The rest of the world will follow and after a few years, the Kim Kardashian esthetic will be seen as lower class.