Vince Ebert über Totalitarismus. t.me/Rosenbusch

The World Health Organization, World Economic Forum, and UN are once again pushing the climate-health narrative at COP30, framing climate change as an immediate health crisis demanding urgent global action. Dr. Tedros declared the planet a “patient in intensive care,” warning that a sick planet means sick people. He called for health to be central in every climate decision and for climate finance to be redirected toward protecting lives. Yet, behind this dramatic rhetoric lies a troubling agenda. The WHO and its allies are using the health crisis framing not just to mobilize public concern, but to justify sweeping new policies and centralized control over global health and environmental governance. The Belen Health Action Plan and the ATTACH initiative are presented as solutions, but they are also tools for expanding the reach of global institutions into national health systems and climate policy. The Baku COP Residents Continuity Coalition further institutionalizes health as a permanent fixture in UN climate negotiations, cementing the role of unelected technocrats in shaping public health and environmental priorities. Critics argue that this narrative is less about protecting people and more about consolidating power. The climate-health agenda is being used to bypass democratic debate, marginalize dissenting voices, and justify top-down mandates that could restrict individual freedoms and economic choices. Meanwhile, the actual funding for health-specific climate action remains shockingly low—just 2% of adaptation funding and 0.5% of multilateral climate finance—suggesting that the real priority is not health, but control. The WHO’s call to “put health at the center of every climate decision” sounds noble, but it’s a Trojan horse for global governance. The real question is: who decides what health means, and who benefits from this new world order? As the climate-health narrative grows louder, so too should our skepticism. There can be no healthy people on a sick planet, but there can also be no healthy people under a regime that sacrifices liberty for the sake of climate orthodoxy.