Interests Sports, Reading & Travel
Caffé du jour
Joined October 2025
- Tweets 721
- Following 51
- Followers 23
- Likes 533
Landers retweeted
Every PCR test in the pandemic ran at 40 cycles, the vast majority were negative. What are you talking about?
Landers retweeted
Bizarre logic, messing around with semantics
Bottom line..he's anti vaccine
Bret Weinstein calls out the scientific impossibility of COVID vaccine “safety.”
“I’m a theoretical biologist. Careful logic is what I do. At the moment they told me they were safe, I knew they were lying.”
“There is no conceivable way they could be safe.”
The logic they don’t want you to hear.
📍Live from the CHD 2025 Moment of Truth Conference in Austin, Texas.
@BretWeinstein
Landers retweeted
Nic shared a German paper he considers a landmark “red-light special 🚨,” claiming that “86% of PCR-positive cases were not real infections.”
I encourage everyone to read the paper carefully and evaluate how the authors reach this conclusion — particularly the assumptions underlying their analysis and whether those assumptions are justified.
The authors essentially offset an estimate of the baseline IgG seropositivity in week 10 of 2020 and then compute a ratio
R = (weekly % IgG seropositivity) / (cumulative sum of weekly PCR positivity rates).
They treat the numerator as the true proportion ever infected and the denominator as the proportion inferred from PCR testing.
They then assume that any R < 1 must be caused entirely by PCR false positives.
Because they find R ≈ 1/7, they infer that 6 / 7 = 86% of positive PCR tests were “not real infections.”
This reasoning is deeply flawed. In real-world data, there is no reason to expect R = 1.0 unless all of the following conditions are simultaneously true:
1. IgG testing is completely random.
2. PCR testing is completely random.
3. PCR testing rates are constant over time.
4. No individual is ever tested twice by PCR.
5. No one is ever reinfected.
6. No one is vaccinated.
7. Every infection leads to detectable IgG antibodies.
8. No one loses antibodies over time (seroreversion).
9. IgG tests are 100% sensitive and specific.
10. PCR tests are 100% sensitive and specific.
Only if all ten conditions held could we expect R = 1.0.
In practice, deviations from any of them will alter R.
Yet the paper essentially ignores points 1–9 and attributes the entire deviation solely to PCR false positives—despite laboratory data showing that PCR false-positive rates are extremely low (nowhere near 86%).
The modeling approach is naïve and built on implausible assumptions, many demonstrably false.
I have no idea how this paper passed peer review; its conclusions are not supported by its analysis, which rests on a fundamentally unsound premise.
The resulting claim that 86% of PCR positives were not true infections is scientifically indefensible.
🚨BREAKING: 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections
New German study finds that during the early pandemic period, only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” were real — proving that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on a fraudulent testing illusion.
PCR technology and testing thresholds were standardized across WHO member states. That means the same distortion likely occurred everywhere — a systemic diagnostic inflation that may be the single greatest fraud in public health history.
These tactics were likely used to amplify fear in order to boost compliance with lockdowns and experimental gene-based “vaccines.”
Accountability is warranted.
Landers retweeted
You attacked my family & children.
Now you’re libeling me & my space.
Maybe you think hiding in echo chambers is the best way to fight vaccine misinformation but that’s what led to the rise of RFK, Jr.
It doesn’t work.
I don’t “platform” anti-vaxxers. I host discussions & change minds.
I get messages weekly from people on the fence thanking me for steering them in the right direction.
One time someone told me I helped stop them from committing suicide.
You can attack me all you want but the real reason we are in this mess is both extreme sides exaggerated the risks of the vaccine and Covid itself.
And I know this because thousands of people have told me this on my space.
I’m cleaning up your mess, “doctor.”
Landers retweeted
The proven fraud and coward libeled me but then deleted it and quote tweeted to engagement farm. 😂
Landers retweeted
Gladly. When are you free? @MilaLRad
Debate us, I dare you.
@NicHulscher @stkirsch
It’s gonna be Data vs. Denial I bet… take a shot over X, let’s see what you got.
@McCulloughFund
Landers retweeted
You mean he doesn't really study EKGs, diagnose STEMIs, treat the patients and present them ready for discharge, all before the ambulance even reaches the hospital?
Landers retweeted
Harry stole my profile picture, zoomed in on my breasts, and tried to instigate a pile-on…all while proving he is scientifically illiterate.
