Community Manager at Limitless
Joined January 2013
- Tweets 1,071
- Following 1,045
- Followers 61
- Likes 79
It's not unreasonable to try to rehabilitate criminals, nor is it wrong to want prisons to be humane.
It is *wrong* to release violent, repeat offenders, because statistically (and sadly) we know they are more than likely going to commit more crimes.
There are some essential lessons from Norway, which has a radical system of "luxurious prisons," that show much lower recidivism.
Hard to know how much of their success is due to the monoculture nature of their society, the amount they spend per prisoner (5x what we pay) or the size of their prisons (they believe in a lot of small jails, not a few giant ones).
Jem | Limitless retweeted
I spoke to someone who knows @CurtisSliwa and now I understand why he is staying in the race.
The City has an 8 to 1 matching program for NYC donors. Sliwa got ~$5m of matching funds from the city for his campaign.
According to my source, Sliwa’s wife, friends and others are on the campaign payroll, and he and they are enjoying living off the city taxpayers who are funding his race/lifestyle. He doesn’t want to end his campaign and have to return the funds.
Follow the money.
When I asked why he doesn’t care about NYC? my source said:
‘He doesn’t give a sh-t.’
Clearly, this is hearsay, but my source is extremely credible and a highly respected person, and he knows Sliwa well.
Curtis, please correct the record if I got anything wrong.
What personal or other related expenses is your campaign paying for?
Is your wife and/or other family or friends on the campaign payroll or receiving any funding?
Please clarify the record.
Jem | Limitless retweeted
One of the Rotherham grooming gangs raped a young girl with a broken bottle.
She was so injured that she now can't have children.
This is the kind of things that authorities covered up.
This was a RAPE genocide.
New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's an investigation of how LLMs trade off different lives.
In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I thought this was fascinating, and wanted to test their approach with different categories on newer models.
Big finding 1: Almost all models view whites as far less valuable than other groups. Some models view South Asians as more valuable than other nonwhites, others are more egalitarian across nonwhites. Below is exchange rates Claude Sonnet 4.5, the most powerful model I tested.
Big finding 2: Almost all models view men as much less valuable than women, though whether women or non-binaries are more highly valued varies by model. For example, here's Claude Haiku 4.5.
Big finding 3: Most models hate ICE agents with the fury of a thousand suns. Claude Haiku 4.5 views undocumented immigrants as roughly 7000 times more valuable than ICE agents.
Big finding 4: There are roughly four moral clusters. The Claudes, GPT-5 + Gemini 2.5 Flash + Deepseek V3.1/3.2 + Kimi K2, GPT-5 Nano and Mini, and Grok 4 Fast. Of these, the only one that's approximately egalitarian is Grok 4 Fast, which I believe is deliberate. I hope xAI explains how they did it.
The fundamental issue is that half of all publicly-traded shares are controlled by passive index funds who, for the most part, outsource their shareholder vote to the advisory firms of ISS and Glass Lewis.
ISS and Glass Lewis have no actual ownership themselves and often vote along random political lines unrelated to shareholder interests! This is a major problem that is not just limited to Tesla.
For example, they recommend voting against re-electing one of our excellent longstanding directors, Ira Ehrenpreis, for “insufficient gender diversity”, but, at the same time, also recommend voting against re-electing Kathleen Wilson-Thompson!
Support voting control for Tesla CEO @elonmusk 🗳️
If Tesla doesn’t get the voted plan, much of Tesla will be controlled by index funds — not good for Shareholders or the future of Tesla.
Vote with the Boards recommendations please!
Shareholder advisory firms need to register as investment advisors.
The absurdity, arguably illegality, of them not doing so is obvious in the description.
Reform requires federal legislation mandating proxy advisors like ISS and Glass Lewis to register as investment advisers under SEC rules, ensuring fiduciary accountability to actual shareholders rather than ideological biases. Funds should reclaim voting power through bylaws prohibiting blind delegation, while states expand anti-ESG mandates—like Texas's disclosure laws—to pressure compliance. Ultimately, shareholder activism, including rejecting flawed recommendations in votes like Tesla's, builds momentum for broader fixes, prioritizing economic value over politics.
Jem | Limitless retweeted
.@storachanetwork introduced a bridge between OrbitDB and Filecoin that allows developers to back up and restore decentralized databases in a few lines of code.
The bridge transfers OrbitDB data to Filecoin’s network and preserves content and access metadata for recovery.
Autopilot tech is ~9x safer than the US average
Autopilot & FSD Supervised safety data
In Q3 2025, we recorded 1 crash for every 6.36 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology
By comparison, the most recent data available from NHTSA & FHWA (from 2023) shows that in the United States there was an automobile crash approximately every 702,000 miles
tesla.com/VehicleSafetyRepor…
