Senator Schumer,
Well well well, if it isn't the maestro of manufactured crises! Let's talk about this "Republican-made health care crisis" you're peddling like some two-bit carnival barker trying to sell snake oil to folks who've forgotten what you said just SIX MONTHS AGO.
First off, let me address that chart you're spreading around like gospel truth. You want to talk about premium increases? Let's examine YOUR party's track record, shall we? That fancy little graph conveniently ignores some rather inconvenient facts. Average annual family health insurance premiums jumped from around $6,000 in 2000 to approximately $27,000 projected in 2025. But here's the kicker that would make even a three-card monte dealer blush with shame—the steepest increases happened AFTER the passage of YOUR precious Affordable Care Act in 2010. That red line on the chart marking Obama's presidency? That's when premiums EXPLODED upward faster than a bottle rocket on the Fourth of July.
And let's be crystal clear about federal subsidies, since you're playing fast and loose with the numbers like a riverboat gambler with marked cards. Federal health insurance subsidies per capita skyrocketed from roughly $4,800 in 2000 to over $13,000 projected by 2025. You're asking taxpayers to foot an increasingly obscene bill to prop up an insurance system that YOUR party created, and then you have the unmitigated gall to blame Republicans when YOU refuse to pass a CLEAN continuing resolution?
Now, about that video where you're announcing you're voting NO on reopening the government—let's discuss your rather selective memory regarding clean CRs, shall we? This is LITERALLY THE FIRST TIME EVER you've voted against a clean CR after supporting them 29 CONSECUTIVE TIMES. Twenty-nine times, Chuck! You voted YES twenty-nine out of thirty times since 2017 on clean CRs—including THIRTEEN TIMES under Biden. But suddenly, when it's YOUR party blocking government funding, the dimwit switch flips and clean CRs become "unacceptable"?
Let me refresh that memory of yours, since you seem to be suffering from a convenient case of political amnesia thicker than pea soup fog. In December 2018, you said—and I quote—"The government is shut down because Trump and the Republicans are hellbent on taking health care away from you. And they won't even come to the table to negotiate a bipartisan CR to reopen the government." Wait, what was that Chuck? "Won't even come to the table to negotiate a bipartisan CR"? Sounds like you understood back then that CRs were THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
But here's where your hypocrisy becomes so thick you could cut it with a butter knife and serve it at Sunday dinner. Your party's "ransom note" demands include extending $1.5 TRILLION in temporary COVID relief—that's enough money that if you stacked one-dollar bills, it would reach approximately 102,000 MILES HIGH, which is 408 TIMES TALLER THAN MOUNT EVEREST and would get you almost HALFWAY TO THE MOON. If those dollars were laid end to end, they would wrap around the EARTH'S EQUATOR 5,884 TIMES. That translates to adding $18,750 per taxpayer to our debt!
And let's address the elephant in the room that you're pretending is just a really large dust bunny—you're holding 42 MILLION SNAP recipients hostage, active-duty MILITARY hostage, air traffic CONTROLLERS hostage, and TSA AGENTS hostage until you get YOUR way on ACA subsidy extensions. Remember when YOUR OWN PARTY said that taking hostages was wrong? Barack Obama in 2013: "You don't get to demand a ransom for doing your job—to keep the government running." So when YOUR PARTY demands $1.5 trillion as the price for reopening government, that's NOT ransom? That's some fascinating double-standard gymnastics that would make an Olympic athlete jealous.
Nancy Pelosi, 2018-2019: "We're not hostage to your wall. Reopen the government." Really appreciate that sentiment, Madam Speaker. So when your caucus does THE EXACT SAME THING, that's somehow different? Hakeem Jeffries, 2022: "Republicans are holding the government and the American people hostage to their extreme agenda." Congressman Jeffries called the Republican clean CR "a partisan Republican spending bill" when he KNOWS IT'S A CLEAN CR.
Here's Quinn's Law #22 for you, Senator: "Liberals love democracy unless it doesn't go their way." And Quinn's Law #23: "Liberals love the law unless they don't agree with it. Then they just don't obey it."
Even two of your own colleagues couldn't stomach the rank hypocrisy dripping from your caucus like syrup from a leaky maple tree. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto broke ranks and voted WITH REPUBLICANS, saying: "This was wrong when Republicans did it, and it's the same now." Senator John Fetterman joined her: "It was wrong when Republicans did this. Now it's our party—it's wrong."
@elonmusk
#CleanCRNow #SchumerHypocrisy #EndTheShutdown #DemocratsBlockingGovernment #QuinnsLawsOfLiberalism #ArticleISection8 #CongressControlsThePurse