I've already spotted several deniers who specifically demanded peer-reviewed papers to prove these phenomena. These same people are now saying this exact walk back. So, which is it then? This is nothing more than dogmatic denialism & scientism. That's all. My brother
@behaviOrganisms has always been right about this.
I did wonder how long it would take.
So, let’s look at the checklist:
It’s not about photos, they can be faked or mistaken.
It’s not about footage, that can be faked or mistaken.
It’s not about witnesses, they can be ill, or mistaken.
It’s not about multiple witnesses, that can be group psychosis.
It’s not about documents, they can be faked, or seeded to misinform.
It’s about following scientific rigour.
Mick West: