Oct 7, 2025 · 12:48 PM UTC

Replying to @pmarca
Even if the number of users were inflated, it was very clear from the start that once a person started using the Internet for daily activities like news, communication, and shopping, they didn’t stop. No one went back to the old ways. Now can the same be said about AI? Perhaps too early to tell.
3
5
Replying to @pmarca
what's adlows?
4
Replying to @pmarca
I wasn’t even born back then, damn
3
Replying to @pmarca
thanks for the flashback Marc, I remember it well 🤣 just like the statement by Copeland of Hayes about copper limitations and their subsequent demise in 94, so many people underestimated tech and its power...
2
Replying to @pmarca
Bad journalism from Peter H. Lewis. He should’ve just called all the “alleged” users to confirm
1
Replying to @pmarca
Reminder that the internet was deployed on the american public and not delivered
1
Replying to @pmarca
Doubts Raised on Amount of Liquidity in the market, Is there really that many cash in the world?
1
Replying to @pmarca
Hey @grok make an image of @pmarca sitting at his computer placing a bet on @Polymarket, but set it all in 1994. And if you can’t do that, just try harder
1
Replying to @pmarca
Ah, visuals can say so much! By the way, have you explored the Geode apps yet? They’re quite nifty for connecting and creating. Check them out!
Replying to @pmarca
gosh. i wasn’t even born yet.
Replying to @pmarca
😂
Replying to @pmarca
haha.
Replying to @pmarca
“By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.” — Paul Krugman, 1998
5
4
3
104
Replying to @pmarca
Same dudes . . . 9 days later, the first flight.
5
22
Replying to @pmarca
Business Day 🐾 $Fartcat Day🐈‍⬛💨
Replying to @pmarca
A picture is not an argument. That’s a picture of an article that casts doubt. It’s not really intended to induce the audience to read what the author wrote. It’s intended to make a point with a picture. But it doesn’t—the picture’s just a snapshot.
1
2
6
Replying to @pmarca
I’m still highly skeptical that there are more than a few dozen humans using this “internet”
9
Replying to @pmarca
so internet was a scam? we will never know
1
6
Replying to @pmarca
Nobody is consistently wrong like the New York Times
5
Replying to @pmarca
such a good time
5
Replying to @pmarca
The internet was a medium, you moron. The Internet was not a product. LLMs are a product, not a medium.
1
4
Replying to @pmarca
AI and the Internet are two vastly different things. One connects people one isolates them to start
3
Replying to @pmarca
I was 6 months old when they ran this headlines. I think they could run it again today.
1
3
Replying to @pmarca
Even in 2000, the internet was still an “unknown unknown.”
3
Replying to @pmarca
One might argue that they thus correctly predicted the dotcom crash just a few years later - more practical on the whole than lamenting their own demise 30 years later.
3
Replying to @pmarca
Perhaps there are more real-time data points this time around
3
Replying to @pmarca
Niche x micro-celebrity idea: post tech newpaper predictions (in the last 100 years) daily. Would liberate more minds than LSD.
1
3
Replying to @pmarca
"...and not even the White House is on the Net." Strange since Al Gore created the Internet from his White House office.
3
Replying to @pmarca
In 1994, the New York Times doubted 30 million internet users. Today, over 5.3 billion people are online. The experts were wrong by a factor of 176x. This pattern repeats with every major technological shift. They're doing it again right now with AI and decentralized networks.
3
Replying to @pmarca
I still feel like AI is overhyped (by the industry). Somehow it’s simultaneously underhyped by laymen.
2
Replying to @pmarca
🤣🤣
2
Replying to @pmarca
And it’s still the hippest place to congregate 30 years later
2
Replying to @pmarca
Please buy TikTok and delete it.
2
Replying to @pmarca
What a time to be alive, it's from 1994. Most of the guys around weren't even born
2