The @nwsl is ruining itself. Start sex screening 😡 @ORLPride pays DSD male — same disorder as cheating Olympic boxer Imane Khelif — Banda $2,100,000 for four years on top of a $740,000 transfer fee. That money belongs to females.

The MWSL...Mostly Women's Soccer League

I am posting an open letter to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to help a distressed mother in Oxfordshire- Regarding so-called gender affirming care surgeries. From, Dr. Joseph Chrysostom MBBS, MS(Gen Surg), FRCSEd United Kingdom To, The Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Respected Prime Minister, Subject: Deception and Harm in Gender Surgeries – Urgent Need for Government Action-Please save an English mother from intense grief and distress. I am writing to you as a medical professional with more than 35 years of experience to raise the gravest possible alarm about the continuation of so-called “gender-affirming surgeries” in the United Kingdom. These operations are being performed on otherwise healthy bodies, and they are being described to patients in terms that are false, misleading, and unethical. When money is paid from public purse or privately, this needs investigation for serious fraud by the agencies concerned. Today (6 November 2025), I received a deeply distressing phone call from a mother in Oxfordshire. Her only daughter, aged 18, is scheduled to undergo a bilateral mastectomy next week in a private hospital. The operating surgeons claim that the procedure will “masculinize” her chest and describe it as cosmetic in nature. However, it is biologically impossible to “masculinize” or convert a female chest into a male chest, unless the trillions of cells within the tissues—each carrying XX sex chromosomes—could somehow be transformed into XY chromosomes, which no surgeon can achieve. Therefore, the claim of creating a “male chest” through surgery is scientifically false and misleading. I believe this constitutes a serious deception of patients and families and warrants urgent investigation by the General Medical Council (GMC), the Royal Colleges, and other relevant regulatory bodies. In my professional opinion, this operation cannot be regarded as cosmetic. A truly cosmetic procedure should not destroy a vital physiological function of the human body. In this case, the patient will permanently lose her ability to lactate in the event of a future pregnancy — a natural physiological function. Furthermore, she will lose the sexual sensations inherently present in the normal nipples and areolae, which are essential for normal sexual response. On these grounds, this surgery cannot, under any circumstances, be considered cosmetic. It is important to highlight that, according to the Oxford Handbook of Paediatrics, an 18-year-old is still considered an adolescent. At this stage, the brain is still maturing, which raises medical concerns about the individual’s ability to provide fully informed consent. Moreover, in my view, any consent obtained through misleading claims about chest “masculinization” or presented as a form of cosmetic surgery cannot be regarded as valid. The mother is devastated. This is her only child. She fears that this mastectomy will be followed by cross-sex hormone treatments and, eventually, phalloplasty, leading to irreversible sterility and other serious medical complications. Prime Minister, this mother is one of your citizens, and she is pleading for help. These interventions will destroy her legitimate hope of one day holding her own grandchild in her arms. I earnestly urge you to take immediate action to prevent this operation from going ahead, especially given the strong parliamentary majority your government holds. I am happy to be contacted anytime if you need any details regarding this mother’s situation. Yours Sincerely, Dr. Joseph Chrysostom MS(Gen Surg), FRCSEd. GMC 5199143

The ECHR may be about to help circumvent European bans on polygamy (From the @ECLJ_Official): The European Court of Human Rights will rule on a case brought before the court by Khaled Al-Anesi, a Yemeni polygamist who was granted asylum in the Netherlands. He initially brought his first wife and their eight children to the Netherlands under family reunification rules. He then decided not to request the arrival of his second and third wives, knowing that polygamy is prohibited in the Netherlands, but requested that the five children he had with them be allowed to join him. The Netherlands refused this new request because of the ban on polygamy, arguing that these children did not need to come to the Netherlands because they already enjoyed good living conditions in Turkey, where they were refugees with their two mothers. The authorities had already asked him to choose which of his wives he wanted to bring over, along with their children. Which he did. But he is now suing his host country before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for violating his right to respect for his family life, due to the refusal to accept his five other children. This is the first time that the European Court has agreed to rule on a polygamy case.  It seems clear that the Yemeni man’s intention is to bring his children over and then, in their name, bring over their mothers. If the mothers’ family reunification is requested by their minor children, and not by the husband, it cannot be refused on the grounds of polygamy. The ban would then be circumvented thanks to human rights. He was welcomed and given financial assistance by the Netherlands when he fled Yemen and he and his wife and eight children benefited from the living conditions of Dutch society. Now he is attacking his “benefactor” and undermining one of the cultural foundations of the country: the prohibition of polygamy. “The ECHR has so deconstructed and expanded the concept of family, in the name of individual freedom, that it obviously extends to polygamous families and protects them. Thus, for the Court, states should recognize “unusual family relationships” and accept “the fact that there is not just one way or one choice when it comes to leading one’s family or private life".”

JUST IN: 5th Circuit will allow Texas to enforce law against minors attending drag shows. Majority: Southwick (GWBush), Engelhardt (Trump). Partial dissent: Dennis (Clinton). Doc: documentcloud.org/documents/…