This film of Mridul Wadhwa admitting he obtained his job at a rape crisis centre by deception has just been removed by YouTube for "copyright infringement", so please don't watch or share it.

This smacks of commanding officers taking the rap for something done by lower ranks. Who actually doctored the Trump speech, and how on earth did Panorama let it then be broadcast?

To all who are rushing to excuse the BBC for its years-long drive to impose a social engineering project on the public: let’s remember Edward R. Murrow, who understood - as few did in the McCarthyite era - the essence of real journalism. It requires an independent mind, and above all courage to go against the grain.

Are you please, for the love of god, going to cover the appalling pro gender ideology issue and the silencing of women’s rights campaigners. Because the longer you ignore or pretend it’s a culture war, the more you are part of the problem. (You might want Lewis to sit this out)

What a shame that journalists like yourself have consistently omitted real women's groups from any discussion about the perversion of reality taking place in the wider society and actively promoted by the media - especially the BBC. Gender propaganda - a top down revolution.

Emily, I hear you are talking to 'key players'. Maybe check out how they've been speaking to women over the last 24 hours. How about extending that list to include females affected in the BBC? How about Martine Croxall for instance. How she has been treated is key.

Guessing it’ll be criticism of the BBC is politically motivated by its competitors and Trump; it’s an attack on trans rights by right wing dupes (women). At no point will BBC capitulation to gender ideology be disseminated or the attack on women’s sex based rights discussed.

Maybe—just an idea—take notice of what women have been saying today to @DAaronovitch @JohnSimpsonNews @bbcnickrobinson @davidyelland ? Rather than just confirming your bias against people who recognise that sex is real and matters?

It *is* so much more complicated than ‘DG resigns over mendacious edit’ We suspect your take will be ‘far right cabal takes advantage of editorial slip’ rather than ‘wholesale institutional capture brings down DG while problem journalists remain in role’

Will you be discussing the decade long capture of your organisation by gender identity ideology and the hugely corrosive impact this has had on your journalistic integrity? I am going to go out on a limb here and say ‘no’.

The BBC must not be allowed to sideline the bias & bullying that has been so damaging to women’s rights & children. The actions of LGBTQ groups in the BBC have helped destroy women’s rights & helped in the appalling medical scandal of sterilisation & mutilation of young people.

Hoping we have heard and seen the last of drag queens on the BBC. If not we know precisely which group of people in the BBC is responsible for continuing to destroy it from the inside.

Trans content is the most consistently egregious example of bias within the WHOLE BBC organisation. The whole TRA movement is fundamentally about lies, coerced speech & the supression of dissent & it has only survived so long through enforcement of the above by orgs like the BBC.

What about the years of capitulation to trans activists, treating gender critical women as pariahs, calling male rapists 'she'? No interest in that, Will?

"There are people who would vehemently disagree with you," Fiona Bruce tell one of the leading medical scientists in the land. Did @bbcquestiontime ever do this to a Climate scientist or insist that some people "vehemently" believe the Twin Towers were destroyed by the CIA?

I noticed that BBC radio news bulletins all day failed to mention the 'trans' bias as part of their failings. I expect the LGBTQ+ network didn't let them 😐

While I was at the cinema, Davie resigned and a lot of blokes continued to literally mansplain the important issue of trust in the BBC . To women who have patiently explained why they have lost trust in the BBC. It's almost as if they cannot hear us.

When Mark Damazer (another middle-aged male ex-BBC executive) mentioned on @BBCr4today that a forensic look at ‘trans’ would be welcome, it was the ideal time for the presenter to point out that there had in fact already been one, and it was ignored.

And then they need to be explicit (at the very least) for their reasons for using wrong-sex pronouns at all. Or trying to have us believe a small subset of men are actually a small subset of women, and vice versa. But once more, here we are.