People understood this long before anyone started issuing certificates saying they understood it for $120k. If you think this is wrong you are exactly who this is meant to protect against because you have no ability to build civilization.
There's a lot of talk about "repeal the 19th" lately because of how obvious it has become that giving women the vote has basically murdered every last bit of hope that humanity ever had to advance beyond the cycle of civilization death.
While it is true that giving women the vote was an awful idea and that it contributed massively to snuffing out the light of the future that we all thought was there in the 90s, it is also an unpopular thing to say, so I'm going to put a finer point on it. I will refer people to this thread when they ask from now on.
Blow, see my charts. The complicated one is a simplified map of psychological development. The other one, with the bell curves is a rough estimate of the development of all adults, and men and women separately. Women tend to develop to about one stage lower than men. This thread is not about why that is. This is just the facts.
As long as we are going to have any sort of government that allows people to vote, it does not make any sense whatsoever to allow people below this recommended minimum to have the right to vote. Smack in the middle of level 5.
Look at how few people that is.
Notice that more men than women get to that level. The bell curve chart is not to scale, so it might be a bigger difference than that (but probably not smaller).
You don't want people below level 5 voting. You really don't. You might think you do, but you don't. Because their reasoning is... not reasonable.
A person at level 4 will always just vote for "my thing." It might be Islam, or Republicans, or abortion, or whatever. But at level 4, a person has an idea of "the good thing," and will always fit all information into "that just makes my thing even more good." There simply is no such thing as reason.
Let's say your "thing" is "fried fish." Why not. You vote for more fried fish. Fried fish candidate. Fried fish on the flag.
Someone tells you that fried fish is bad for you and we should try to get away from it.
At level 4, that idea is just wrong. How could they be so STUPID? Fried fish is GOOD. So that means THEY must be bad. Now, you begin to write a story about how bad and stupid this person is so that fried fish can win.
Let's say that the oceans are being overfished to make fried fish, and it's ruining the ecosystem. Someone tells you this, too. Your response? They must just be JEALOUS that fried fish is WINNING. There isn't an "ecosystem!" You made it up because you hate fried fish, which is the only good thing in the world!
I won't get into it, but levels 3 and 2 are even worse than that. In short, someone at level 2 or 3 will just vote for "whoever is like me," even if that person is absurdly unqualified and has a history of brutal, vile crimes.
I hope you can see why it would be bad to let people at these levels vote. And if you can't, that probably means you are AT those lower levels. And so to help you understand why it's bad to let them vote...
Just imagine you're outnumbered.
If you love abortion, just imagine that no-abortion people outnumber you, and they are at level 4. Nothing you ever say or do will make them change their minds.
If you are pro-gun, imagine anti-gun people outnumber you, and they will never listen to a single word you say.
If you are muslim, imagine that anti-muslims outnumber you and they vote to get rid of islam, and they never care at all what you think about it.
You lose! FRIED FISH WINS! HAHAHAHA! That's your reality forever. You wouldn't wanna be stuck like that, would you?
As you can see, most people in the world are at these 4 lower levels. Women are at them more often than men. That means that voting became significantly less rational when we let women do it.
In addition to that, Western (White) countries usually have an average at about level 5 for men, 4 for women. Mass immigration means that you've replaced all those level-5 thinkers with millions and millions of level 3 and 4 thinkers, and some 2.
Explains a lot, doesn't it?
And once again, if that doesn't explain things for you, you probably are just AT one of the lower levels. If you're going to say "women and nonwhites ARE NOT at lower levels," that's just your "fried fish." You're welcome to investigate all of this for yourself. I know what you'll find, and it's exactly what I've depicted.
So if we're going to keep "voting" as "a thing," we must also create a strict requirement of stable, rational thinking, which is going to exclude not only most humans, but also significantly more women than men.
SOME women will be able to pass the test. Just not as many. Which means that letting all women vote made voting less rational and more destructive, and that's a big part of why everything's so unbelievably fucked.
And that's what I mean when I say "we shouldn't have let women vote."
Maybe now you can see why they say "repeal the 19th" for short. No one has the time to say all this (except me).