The BBC tell lies? Panadrama caught telling lies? So they can do that to a president? So what do you think they will do to us minions?
This is my reality. This is what was done to my daughter and to me, and I am no longer softening a single word.
My daughter Paloma was given chemotherapy drugs without consent, without a confirmed diagnosis, and against everything she said, wrote, and legally recorded. She told them she was unsure. She asked questions. She never signed a SACT form. They lied to her face and told her it was “low-dose steroids and saline.” This is in their own notes. Not mine. Theirs.
Paloma had already put the hospital on notice for legal action. They knew it. They carried on anyway.
She disclosed two alleged sexual assaults and had a crime reference number from the police. Panorama knew this. The BBC & the Daily Mail knew this. They all had the documents. They all had the emails she sent herself. They still chose to parade the ex-boyfriend on television as if he were the voice of truth.
That tells you everything about who they serve.
The consultant who admitted in writing, in the High Court, in the coroner’s paperwork, and under oath that Paloma did not give consent, suddenly tried to invent a new story: “I didn’t realise we needed consent.”
She then flew out of the country the same day she gave evidence.
She is not returning. Dubai!
Make of that what you will.
Two NHS Trusts held records showing no consent.
Paloma’s bloods collapsed only after their drugs.
Her oxygen dropped only after their drugs.
Her heart rate spiked only after their drugs.
The decline followed their intervention, not her condition.
When Paloma fainted in July, she was pale, conscious to voice, with a pulse and oxygen saturation. Witnesses saw it. Paramedics were told clearly. Instead of listening, they treated her as a cardiac arrest she was not in, drilled into her leg with an IO gun, injected adrenaline into a 37 kg woman, and she deteriorated after the intervention, not before. Shown on the Life Pak 15 contemporaneous primary evidence printout.
Iatrogenic death Opinions are free the timeline is not.
Then came the coroners.
A “no-quest” dressed up as an inquest.
Witnesses who contradicted the NARRATIVE were not called.
Evidence was removed from the bundle.
Drug charts “missing.”
ECGs “missing.”
Scans not done and “missing.”
Toxicology never done.
Samples not preserved.
Jurisdiction twisted from Sussex to Kent based on claims they later contradicted in their own official letters.
Coroner Catherine Wood claimed Paloma’s “last treatment” was in Kent, then admitted herself that key treatment was in Brighton.
Fiona King and Patricia Harding told the Chief Coroner that most witnesses were from Kent.
Fifteen were from Sussex.
Four were from Kent.
Their own admission contradicts their own justification.
This was not an inquest.
It was containment and protection of the state.
It was a banana-republic performance to block exposure.
The media ran right alongside it.
The BBC.
Panorama.
The Daily Mail.
Every one of them working as the state’s PR department.
They had Paloma’s High Court statement.
They had the records from two Trusts.
They had the coroner contradictions.
They had the evidence of no consent.
They had the crime reference number.
They had the witnesses.
They had the emails.
They ignored it all.
They chose the narrative that protected the institutions.
Not the truth.
Not the evidence.
Not the words of the young woman who lived it.
Then vilified the mother who watched it.
The BBC, Panorama, the Daily Mail and the liars in the press acted like pimps and whores for a tyrannical state. Nothing more. Nothing less. Selling their reputation to the highest bidder, performing and calling it journalism.
My daughter deserved better.
The public deserves better.
This is what they did, how they did it. You are going have access to all of the notes and transcripts soon. I own that 999 call.
The truth is there. Horrific.