This is a reply to asking why Vercel no longer hires in Spain.
It also explains why "remote" positions are often "remote in Country X" (e.g. US, UK the most frequent ones.)
When a company employs someone remote in Country Y, they need to follow Country Y regulations...
Oct 13, 2025 · 5:58 PM UTC
... and following those regulations can be expensive+time-consuming. File rigid procedures, mandatory processes with lots of paperwork, and so on.
Most US companies are taken aback by these requirements in European countries. So they either exit or...
... or they are big enough to hire a local fulltime site lead to deal with all this
... or they only employ via B2B contract, that is not employment (forget about things like equity, but it can still pay well)
It's the reality of remote employment! Location matters v much
Yes, Cost of Employment hits US companies hard
Eg when they pay someone €100K in France, the gross salary of that person (from which they pay taxes) is €75K. There's a 30-40% "cost of employer" on top of gross salary, invisible to the employee
Yes this is a great read if you're interested in what it takes to employ in different countries as full-remote
It's s LOT of work for the company hiring, which is why few companies do it outside of US + UK!
GitLab publish their internal handbook for how they employee people in different countries around the world, it's fascinating handbook.gitlab.com/handbook…
Rippling and Deel kind of solve for this... at a major overhead cost.
And employees become employees of a local Rippling or Deel company that can add more confusion and clarity
And, again, the cost of doing this surprises US startups I talk to

























