you can just ask strangers on the internet to be your mentors

A new nature-published research says Language models still blur belief and knowledge, so facts and fiction get mixed. A new KaBLE benchmark with 13,000 questions across 13 tasks tests 24 models and shows big failures on first person false belief. KaBLE checks if a model tracks who knows what, who only believes, and whether a claim is true. On first person false belief, GPT 4o drops from 98.2% to 64.4%, and DeepSeek R1 falls from about 90% to 14.4%. Means models look smart on one view of belief but break on the view that matches real users speaking in first person. For third person false belief, newer models score about 95% and older ones about 79%, but first person scores drop to 62.6% and 52.5%. This gap points to attribution bias, where the model treats the speaker as if they hold the real facts instead of separating belief from reality. The study also tests recursive knowledge, like who knows that someone else knows something, and newer models solve many cases but their steps are inconsistent. These shifting steps look like pattern matching rather than a stable rule for reasoning about belief and knowledge. --- nature .com/articles/s42256-025-01113-8

Hasan Piker just went full mask off at the Zohran election victory party, declares it a tragedy that the USA defeated the Soviet Union in the Cold War. AOC embraced him on camera just two minutes before he said this

David Sacks says the biggest risk of AI was described not by James Cameron in The Terminator but by George Orwell in 1984. “I almost feel like the term ‘woke AI’ is insufficient to explain what’s going on because it somehow trivializes it.” “What we’re really talking about is 'Orwellian AI.' We’re talking about AI that lies to you, that distorts an answer, that rewrites history in real time to serve a current political agenda of the people who are in power.” “To me, this is the biggest risk of AI... It’s not The Terminator, it’s 1984.” @DavidSacks

Researchers have mathematically proven that the universe cannot be a computer simulation. Their paper in the Journal of Holography Applications in Physics shows that reality operates on principles beyond computation. Using Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, they argue that no algorithmic or computational system can fully describe the universe, because some truths, so called "Gödelian truths" require non algorithmic understanding, a form of reasoning that no computer or simulation can reproduce. Since all simulations are inherently algorithmic, and the fundamental nature of reality is non algorithmic, the researchers conclude that the universe cannot be, and could never be a simulation.

Physical abuse causes bruises. Psychological abuse causes psychological trauma. Literally brain damage. And just how abusive parents will say their child “fell down the stairs” etc, to cover up the bruises they caused, psychologically abusive parents will say their child “has an inherent mental disorder” to cover up the abuse trauma they cause. As a society, we really need to be able to identify the effects and patterns of psychological abuse as a red flag of child abuse just the same as seeing bruises all over a child would alarm us 🚩

I think we are all losing our minds. Let me float an idea I haven’t heard. What made us a poweful wealthy and largely decent society was a kind of tasteful hypocrisy if you will. We had regulated markets and trade which we called “Free Markets”. We had somewhat public spirited cronyism which we called “Capitalism”. We had a party-managed republic we called a “Democracy”. We had a Senate while somehow proclaiming “One man, One Vote”. We had a million restrictions on what could be said frictionlessly at scale and who has that privilege, and yet we openly claimed we had “Free Speech”. It’s all sort of mind blowing. It never made complete sense. At least to me. At it’s absolute best, our whole thing was a tasteful managed hypocrisy. And that hypocrisy creaked along and worked for us. But it doesn’t play well on the internet. So now we are trying to go back to an imagined consistent system to resolve that hypocrisy. Which can’t be done. I wish that weren’t true…but I’m afraid it is. If no one else will say it, I will. I think the crazy compromises and checks and balances at least need to be revisited. They were always somewhat comically hypocritical. Granted. But the new search for ideological purity may doom us even more quickly. One man’s opinion.

>learns that syntax can be ambiguous >fails to distinguish semantics from syntax >concludes that programming is linguistics >140K views and 10K likes on YouTube in a day What is wrong with you, you fucking worthless idiots who upvote this absolute dogshit of pseudo-tech content?

BTW, Avi Loeb told us this earlier this year in an article on Medium. He said that the images from all of the big telescopes are piped directly to the intelligence community before the scientists see the them. Confirmed by two sources.

The Vice President of the United States opted out of the wall kissing ritual in Israel, instead choosing to visit the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, and told the world that Israel voting to annex the West Bank was stupid & won’t happen Times are changing

dear algo please only show this tweet to S tier hardware engineers

dear algo please only show this tweet to S tier programmers